Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
1.
J Community Genet ; 11(2): 183-191, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31168696

ABSTRACT

The new Dutch guidelines on hereditary and familial ovarian carcinoma recommend genetic testing of all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). With this study, we aimed to obtain insight into (1) the acceptance and timing of the offer of genetic counseling in women with EOC, (2) reasons for accepting or declining genetic counseling, and (3) psychological differences between women who did and did not have genetic counseling. A multicenter questionnaire survey was performed in patients with EOC in four Dutch oncology centers. The questionnaire addressed whether, how, and when genetic counseling was offered, women's arguments to accept or decline genetic counseling, and included the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A total of 67 women completed the questionnaire, of which 43 had genetic counseling. Despite a wide variability in the timing of the offer of genetic counseling, 89% of the women were satisfied with the timing. No significant differences were found between the CWS and HADS scores for the timing of the offer of genetic counseling and whether or not women had genetic counseling. Taking the small sample size into account, the results tentatively suggest that genetic counseling may have limited impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of women with EOC. Therefore, we assume that implementation of the new guidelines offering genetic counseling to all patients with EOC will not cause considerable additional burden to these patients.

2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 45(4): 560-566, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30621962

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients may transfer of hospital for clinical reasons but this may delay time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to provide insight in the extent of hospital transfer in breast cancer care; which type of patients transfer and what is the impact on time to treatment. METHODS: We included 41,413 breast cancer patients registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2014 and 2016. We investigated transfer of hospital between diagnosis and first treatment being surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Co-variate adjusted characteristics predictive for hospital transfer were determined. To adjust for possible treatment by indication bias we used propensity score matching (PSM). Time to treatment in patients with and without hospital transfer was compared. RESULTS: Among 41,413 patients, 8.5% of all patients transferred to another hospital between diagnosis and first treatment; 4.9% before primary surgery and 24.8% before NAC. Especially young (aged <40 years) patients and those who underwent a mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) were more likely to transfer. The association of mastectomy with IBR with hospital transfer remained when using PSM. Hospital transfer after diagnosis significantly prolonged time to treatment; breast-conserving surgery by 5 days, mastectomy by 7 days, mastectomy with IBR by 9 days and NAC by 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: While almost 5% of Dutch patients treated with primary surgery transfer hospital after diagnosis and up to 25% for patients treated with NAC, our findings suggest that especially those treated with primary surgery are at risk for additional treatment delay by hospital transfer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/statistics & numerical data , Mastectomy, Segmental/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Netherlands , Registries
3.
Clin Genet ; 93(1): 52-59, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589637

ABSTRACT

To establish whether existing mutation prediction models can identify which male breast cancer (MBC) patients should be offered BRCA1 and BRCA2 diagnostic DNA screening, we compared the performance of BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm), BRCAPRO (BRCA probability) and the Myriad prevalence table ("Myriad"). These models were evaluated using the family data of 307 Dutch MBC probands tested for BRCA1/2, 58 (19%) of whom were carriers. We compared the numbers of observed vs predicted carriers and assessed the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) for each model. BOADICEA predicted the total number of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers quite accurately (observed/predicted ratio: 0.94). When a cut-off of 10% and 20% prior probability was used, BRCAPRO showed a non-significant better performance (observed/predicted ratio BOADICEA: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.60-1.09] and 0.79, 95% CI: [0.57-1.09], vs. BRCAPRO: 1.02, 95% CI: [0.75-1.38] and 0.94, 95% CI: [0.68-1.31], respectively). Myriad underestimated the number of carriers in up to 69% of the cases. BRCAPRO showed a non-significant, higher AUC than BOADICEA (0.798 vs 0.776). Myriad showed a significantly lower AUC (0.671). BRCAPRO and BOADICEA can efficiently identify MBC patients as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Besides their general applicability, these tools will be of particular value in countries with limited healthcare resources.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Mutation , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Gene Frequency , Heterozygote , Humans , Male , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , ROC Curve
4.
Breast ; 30: 66-72, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27639031

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Women seeking counseling because of familial breast cancer occurrence face difficult decisions, such as whether and when to opt for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in case of BRCA1/2 mutation. Only limited research has been done to identify the psychological factors associated with the decision for RRM. This study investigated which psychological factors are related to the intention to choose for RRM. MATERIALS & METHODS: A cohort of 486 cancer-unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer completed the following questionnaires prior to genetic counseling: the Cancer Worry Scale, Positive And Negative Affect Scale, Perceived Personal Control Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and State Anxiety Scale and questions regarding socio-demographic characteristics, family history, risk perception and RRM intention. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relation between psychological factors and women's intention to choose for RRM. RESULTS: Factors associated with RRM intention were high positive affect (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.12-3.08), high negative affect (OR = 2.52, 95%CI = 1.44-4.43), high cancer worry (OR = 1.65, 95%CI = 1.00-2.72), high perceived personal control (OR = 3.58, 95%CI = 2.18-5.89), high risk-perception (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.15-2.95) and having children (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 1.21-3.50). CONCLUSION: Negative and positive affects play an important role in the intention for RRM. Furthermore, perceived personal control over the situation is associated with an intention for RRM. In addition to focusing on accurate risk communication, counseling should pay attention to the influence of perceived control and emotions to facilitate decision-making.


Subject(s)
Affect , Anxiety/psychology , Choice Behavior , Decision Making , Depression/psychology , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/psychology , Intention , Prophylactic Mastectomy/psychology , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Counseling , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/genetics , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/surgery , Humans , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Participation , Perception , Risk , Risk Reduction Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Public Health Genomics ; 17(1): 16-22, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24216604

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn screening for hemoglobinopathies started in The Netherlands in 2007. Herewith severe conditions, such as sickle cell disease, ß-thalassemia major and hemoglobin H disease are putatively identified. Additionally, at least 1,800 carriers of hemoglobin variants associated with severe conditions in homozygote or compound heterozygote forms are identified yearly. Thus far, approximately 60 patients and 800 healthy sickle cell (HbS) carriers are reported each year among 180,000 newborns. Results are sent to the general practitioner with the recommendation to inform and diagnose both parents of the healthy carriers to exclude genetic risk, while patients and their parents are referred directly to a pediatrician. This study was performed to determine how often parents of identified carriers and affected newborns are seen in genetic centers for counseling. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected anonymized data from 7 of the 8 Dutch clinical genetic centers from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2010. RESULTS: After an initial general increase in total counseling intakes, a decline was noticed in the third year, while the requests for prenatal diagnoses remained relatively stable. In 2007 and 2013, genetic counselors were asked for self-reported knowledge. They found hemoglobinopathy counseling complex, but by 2013, they indicated they had acquired sufficient knowledge on most hemoglobinopathy aspects. CONCLUSION: We could not observe a significant increase in genetic counseling for hemoglobinopathy after its introduction into newborn screening. Although 120 HbS carriers and 60 patients are expected to be born from couples at risk annually, only 33 at risk couples out of 540 families of diagnosed newborns received optimal care and information at a genetics center in 4 years.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Hemoglobinopathies/diagnosis , National Health Programs , Neonatal Screening , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemoglobinopathies/genetics , Hemoglobinopathies/psychology , Heterozygote , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Parents , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Br J Cancer ; 108(8): 1579-86, 2013 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23579217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the most effective strategy (mammography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) for screening women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Dutch, UK and US screening strategies, which involve mammography and MRI at different ages and intervals were evaluated in high-risk women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. METHODS: Into a validated simulation screening model, outcomes and cost parameters were integrated from published and cancer registry data. Main outcomes were life-years gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The simulation was situated in the Netherlands as well as in the United Kingdom, comparing the Dutch, UK and US strategies with the population screening as a reference. A discount rate of 3% was applied to both costs and health benefits. RESULTS: In terms of life-years gained, the strategies from least to most cost-effective were the UK, Dutch and US screening strategy, respectively. However, the differences were small. Applying the US strategy in the Netherlands, the costs were €43 800 and 68 800 for an additional life-year gained for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. At a threshold of €20 000 per life-year gained, implementing the US strategy in the Netherlands has a very low probability of being cost-effective. Stepping back to the less-effective UK strategy would save relatively little in costs and results in life-years lost. When implementing the screening strategies in the United Kingdom, the Dutch, as well as the US screening strategy have a high probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: From a cost-effectiveness perspective, the Dutch screening strategy is preferred for screening high-risk women in the Netherlands as well as in the United Kingdom.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Mutation , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography/economics , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Models, Statistical , Netherlands , United Kingdom , United States
7.
Br J Cancer ; 106(12): 2016-24, 2012 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22669161

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The variable penetrance of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers suggests that other genetic or environmental factors modify breast cancer risk. Two genes of special interest are prohibitin (PHB) and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), both of which are important either directly or indirectly in maintaining genomic integrity. METHODS: To evaluate the potential role of genetic variants within PHB and MTHFR in breast and ovarian cancer risk, 4102 BRCA1 and 2093 BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 6211 BRCA1 and 2902 BRCA2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA) were genotyped for the PHB 1630 C>T (rs6917) polymorphism and the MTHFR 677 C>T (rs1801133) polymorphism, respectively. RESULTS: There was no evidence of association between the PHB 1630 C>T and MTHFR 677 C>T polymorphisms with either disease for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers when breast and ovarian cancer associations were evaluated separately. Analysis that evaluated associations for breast and ovarian cancer simultaneously showed some evidence that BRCA1 mutation carriers who had the rare homozygote genotype (TT) of the PHB 1630 C>T polymorphism were at increased risk of both breast and ovarian cancer (HR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10-2.04 and HR 2.16, 95%CI 1.24-3.76, respectively). However, there was no evidence of association under a multiplicative model for the effect of each minor allele. CONCLUSION: The PHB 1630TT genotype may modify breast and ovarian cancer risks in BRCA1 mutation carriers. This association need to be evaluated in larger series of BRCA1 mutation carriers.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Humans , Mutation , Prohibitins , Risk
8.
Clin Genet ; 81(5): 421-9, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22091929

ABSTRACT

In predictive DNA testing for hereditary cancer, test results should traditionally be disclosed face-to-face. Increasingly, however, counselees ask to receive their test result at home by letter. To compare the quality of genetic counselling in the traditional way to a procedure in which counselees are offered a choice on how to get their test result. Counselees from families with a known BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome mutation were randomised into two groups. The control group was given the DNA test result in a face-to-face consultation. In the intervention group people could choose to learn their test result face-to-face or by letter. The quality of genetic counselling was assessed through questionnaires at three different moments. Data of 198 counselees were analysed. The quality of genetic counselling and psychological functioning were equally good in both groups. The majority of cases chose for disclosure by letter. The counselees with a good test result in the intervention group were the most satisfied. Our results indicate that in predictive DNA testing for BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome, a choice protocol is equally safe and more satisfying. Moreover, it is more efficient for both counsellor and counselee.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/psychology , Disclosure , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Counseling , Adult , Choice Behavior , Female , Genetic Testing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Access to Records , Patient Satisfaction , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Neurology ; 77(1): 62-6, 2011 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21700587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac involvement has been reported in carriers of dystrophin mutations giving rise to Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). The progress of these abnormalities during long-term follow-up is unknown. We describe the long-term follow-up of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in DMD/BMD carriers. METHODS: A long-term follow-up study was performed among Dutch DMD/BMD carriers first analyzed in 1995. A cardiac history was taken, and all carriers were assigned a functional score to assess skeletal muscle involvement. Electrocardiography and M-mode and 2-D echocardiography were performed. DCM was defined as an enlarged left ventricle with a global left ventricle dysfunction or fractional shortening less than 28%. Slow vital capacity of the lung was measured by a hand-held spirometer. RESULTS: Ninety-nine carriers were monitored with a median follow-up of 9 years (range 7.0-10.6 years). Eleven carriers with DCM (10 DMD, 1 BMD) were identified. Nine of them developed DCM in the follow-up period. One of the patients with DCM reported in the 1995 study died of cardiac failure at age 57 years. DCM was more frequently found in carriers who were functionally symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Cardiac abnormalities in DMD/BMD carriers are progressive, as in patients with DMD/BMD.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/etiology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/complications , Adult , Aged , Disease Progression , Echocardiography/methods , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric
10.
Clin Genet ; 79(3): 207-18, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21114486

ABSTRACT

Previous studies on the counsellees' perception of DNA test results did not clarify whether counsellees were asked about their recollections or interpretations, and focused only on patients' own risks and not on the likelihood that cancer is heritable in the family. We tested differences and correlations of four perception aspects: recollections and interpretations of both cancer risks and heredity likelihood. In a retrospective study, women tested for BRCA1/2 on average, 5 years ago, completed questionnaires about their perception. Participants had received an unclassified variant (n = 76), uninformative (n = 76) or pathogenic mutation (n = 51) result in BRCA1/2. Analyses included t-tests, correlations and structural equation modelling. The counsellees' perception showed to consist of four distinctive phenomena: recollections and interpretations of cancer risks and of heredity likelihood. This distinctiveness was suggested by significant differences between these perception variables. Moderate to strong correlations were found between these variables, suggesting that these differences between variables were consistent. The relationships between these variables were not influenced by actually communicated DNA test results, sociodemographics, medical and pedigree information, or framing of cancer risk questions. The largest differences between recollections and interpretations were found in the unclassified variant group and the smallest in uninformatives. Cancer risks and heredity likelihood correlated least in the pathogenic mutation group. Communication of ambiguous genetic information enlarged the differences. To understand the counsellees' perception of genetic counselling, researchers should study recollections and interpretations of cancer risks and heredity likelihood. Genetic counsellors should explicitly address the counsellees' recollections and interpretations, and be aware of possible inaccuracies.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Mental Recall , Ovarian Neoplasms , Perception , Risk , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Maturitas ; 66(3): 310-4, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20409655

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Women with a BRCA1/2 mutation or members of a hereditary breast ovarian cancer family (HBOC) have an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. The only effective strategy to reduce this risk is a risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term surgical outcome and safety of a RRSO. PATIENT AND METHODS: Included were all consecutive women with a BRCA1/2 mutation or members of a HBOC family who visited our Family Cancer Clinic between September 1995 and March 2006, and choose for RRSO. RESULTS: 159 women were included, of which 97 (61.0%) BRCA1 and 32 (20.1%) BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 30 women of a HBOC family (18.9%). The median age at RRSO was 42.9 years (30.3-61.1) in the BRCA1 group, 48.4 years (33.5-66.9) in the BRCA 2 group and 46.4 (32.8-68.7) years in the HBOC group (p=0.02). The median body mass index (BMI) was 24.9 kg/m(2), 30.1% were overweighed (BMI 25-30) and 18.7% were obese (BMI>30). The RRSO was performed by primary laparoscopy (n=154) or laparotomy (n=5). Intraoperatively, one (0.6%) major complication occurred and laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy. In one patient (0.6%) a minor complication occurred. Post-operatively five minor complications (3.1%) were observed. Median hospital stay was 1 day (0-13 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RRSO in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers seems to be a safe procedure with a low intraoperative and post-operative complication rate (1.3% and 3.1% respectively), a low conversion rate (0.6%) and a short median hospital stay (1.0 day).


Subject(s)
Fallopian Tubes/surgery , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Ovariectomy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Ovariectomy/adverse effects , Ovariectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Treatment Outcome
12.
Placenta ; 28(1): 1-5, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16620961

ABSTRACT

Trafficking of cells between the fetus and its mother provides indirect clues to the underlying pathophysiology of pregnancy. Georg Schmorl first documented the presence of fetal cells in the maternal body and emphasized the importance of the placenta in eclampsia. Although his classic paper, written in 1893, is widely cited today, few investigators have actually read the paper, as it was published in German [Schmorl G., Pathologisch-anatomische Untersuchungen über Puerperal-Eklampsie. Verlag FCW Vogel, Leipzig; 1893]. Our goal was to translate the paper into English and critically re-evaluate its conclusions from a 21st century perspective. Schmorl was remarkably astute in his assessment of the pathologic changes that were seen in the 17 women on whom he performed complete autopsies. He found similar severe changes in all of the women, implying a common pathogenesis. This was in direct contrast to the then current doctrine. He was the first to observe the presence of thrombi containing multinucleated syncytial giant cells in the lungs of the women and speculated that they were of placental origin. To support his hypothesis he performed animal experiments. He also recognized that feto-maternal trafficking occurred in normal gestations but was increased in pregnancies affected by eclampsia. Using sophisticated molecular techniques we can now precisely confirm what Schmorl so elegantly described.


Subject(s)
Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Pre-Eclampsia/blood , Trophoblasts/physiology , Female , History, 19th Century , Humans , Obstetrics/history , Pregnancy
13.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 102(3): 357-63, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17051427

ABSTRACT

In the MRISC study, women with an inherited risk for breast cancer were screened by a 6-month clinical breast examination (CBE) and yearly MRI and mammography. We found that the MRISC screening scheme could facilitate early breast cancer diagnosis and that MRI was a more sensitive screening method than mammography, but less specific. In the current study we investigated the contribution of MRI in the early detection of breast cancer in relation to tumor characteristics. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 women were included and 50 breast cancers were detected, of which 45 were evaluable and included in the current study. We compared the characteristics of tumors detected by MRI-only with those of all other (non-palpable) screen-detected tumors. Further, we compared the sensitivity of mammography and MRI within subgroups according to different tumor characteristics. Twenty-two (49%) of the 45 breast cancers were detected by MRI and not visible at mammography, of which 20 (44%) were also not palpable (MRI-only detected tumors). MRI-only detected tumors were more often node-negative than other screen-detected cancers (94 vs. 59%; P=0.02) and tended to be more often

Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mass Screening/methods , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Early Diagnosis , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Sensitivity and Specificity
14.
Br J Cancer ; 95(6): 757-62, 2006 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16909138

ABSTRACT

To establish an efficient, reliable and easy to apply risk assessment tool to select families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients for BRCA mutation testing, using available probability models. In a retrospective study of 263 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the utility of the Frank (Myriad), Gilpin (family history assessment tool) and Evans (Manchester) model was analysed, to select 49 BRCA mutation-positive families. For various cutoff levels and combinations, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared. The best combinations were subsequently validated in additional sets of families. Comparable sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the Gilpin and Evans models. They appeared to be complementary to the Frank model. To obtain an optimal sensitivity, five 'additional criteria' were introduced that are specific for the selection of small or uninformative families. The optimal selection is made by the combination 'Frank >or=16% or Evans2 >or=12 or one of five additional criteria'. The efficiency of the selection of families for mutation testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 can be optimised by using a combination of available easy to apply risk assessment models.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Models, Statistical , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Selection , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cohort Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Pedigree , Predictive Value of Tests , Probability , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
Clin Genet ; 67(6): 517-25, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15857419

ABSTRACT

Benign familial infantile convulsions (BFIC) is an autosomal dominantly inherited partial epilepsy syndrome of early childhood with remission before the age of 3 years. The syndrome has been linked to loci on chromosomes 1q23, 2q24, 16p12-q12, and 19q in various families. The aim of this study was to identify the responsible locus in four unrelated Dutch families with BFIC. Two of the tested families had pure BFIC; in one family, affected individuals had BFIC followed by paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesias at later age, and in one family, BFIC was accompanied by later-onset focal epilepsy in older generations. Linkage analysis was performed for the known loci on chromosomes 1q23, 2q24, 16p12-q12, and 19q. The two families with pure BFIC were linked to chromosome 16p12-q12. Using recombinants from these and other published families, the chromosome 16-candidate gene region was reduced from 21.4 Mb (4.3 cm) to 2.7 Mb (0.0 cm). For the other two families, linkage to any of the known loci was unlikely. In conclusion, we confirm the linkage of pure BFIC to chromosome 16p12-q12, with further refinement of the locus. Furthermore, the lack of involvement of the known loci in two of the families indicates further genetic heterogeneity for BFIC.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16 , Epilepsy, Benign Neonatal/genetics , Chromosome Mapping , Genetic Linkage , Genetic Markers , Genotype , Haplotypes , Humans , Lod Score , Pedigree
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(16): 3293-301, 2004 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15310772

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate a shared decision-making intervention (SDMI) for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who have to make a choice between screening and prophylactic surgery for breasts and/or ovaries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SDMI consisted of two value assessment sessions, using the time trade-off method, followed by individualized treatment information based on (quality-adjusted) life expectancy. After the baseline assessment (2 weeks after a positive DNA test result), women were randomly assigned to the SDMI group (n = 44), receiving the SDMI 2 months after the test result, or to the control group (n = 44). The short- and long-term effects, 3 and 9 months after the test result, were assessed using questionnaires. Data were collected on well-being, treatment choice, and decision-related outcomes. RESULTS: In the short term, the SDMI had no effect. In the long term, with respect to well-being, patients in the SDMI group had less intrusive thoughts (P =.05) and better general health (P =.01) and tended to be less depressed (P =.07). With respect to decision-related outcomes for the breasts, the SDMI group held stronger preferences (P =.02) and agreed more strongly to having weighed the pros and cons (P =.01). No effect was found on treatment choice. In the long term, interaction effects between the SDMI and cancer history were found. The SDMI showed an overall beneficial effect for unaffected women, whereas affected women tended to experience detrimental effects. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the SDMI improved decision making in unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Supporting decision making in a systematic way using trade-offs is beneficial for these women.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Participation , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Humans , Life Expectancy , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life
18.
Am J Med Genet A ; 124A(4): 346-55, 2004 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14735581

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the impact of BRCA1/2 testing and disclosure of a positive test result on women affected and unaffected with cancer. Longitudinal cohort study including women affected and unaffected with breast or ovarian cancer testing for a BRCA1/2 mutation. Data on well-being (anxiety, depression, cancer related distress, general health), treatment choice, and decision making about cancer prevention were collected at baseline (1 week after blood sampling; affected n = 192, unaffected n = 176) and at follow-up (2 weeks after disclosure of a positive test result; affected n = 23, unaffected n = 66). Women affected and unaffected with breast or ovarian cancer were compared using univariate statistics. Change over time was examined using repeated measures analysis of variance. With respect to well-being, affected women scored worse at baseline. At follow-up, both affected and unaffected women experienced a decline in well-being, which tended to be stronger in affected women. Women diagnosed with cancer less than 1 year previously tended to report a worse well-being than those diagnosed longer ago. With respect to treatment choice, more affected women intended to obtain prophylactic surgery and valued it higher at both time points. With respect to decision making, affected women had a lower preference for participation in decision making at baseline; no differences were found at follow-up. At follow-up, both affected and unaffected women showed an increase in strength of treatment preference and a decrease in decision uncertainty. Disclosure of a positive test result had a negative impact on well-being. Affected women, especially those who have been recently diagnosed with cancer, experienced the worst well-being and could benefit from psychosocial support.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Testing , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome
19.
Br J Cancer ; 90(2): 333-42, 2004 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14735173

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a decision aid (DA) and its timing in women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation. Women with and without a previous history of cancer were included after blood sampling for genetic testing. The DA consisted of a brochure and video providing information on screening and prophylactic surgery. To evaluate the impact of the DA, women were randomised to the DA group (n=184), receiving the DA 2 weeks after blood sampling, or to the control group (n=184). To evaluate the impact of timing, mutation carriers who had received the DA before the test result (n=47) were compared to mutation carriers who received the DA after the test result (n=42). Data were collected on well-being, treatment choice, decision and information related outcomes. The impact of the DA was measured 4 weeks after blood sampling. The impact of timing was measured 2 weeks after a positive test result. The DA had no impact on well-being. Regarding decision related outcomes, the DA group more frequently considered prophylactic surgery (P=0.02) corroborated with higher valuations (P=0.04). No differences were found for the other decision related outcomes. Regarding information related outcomes, the DA group felt better informed (P=0.00), was more satisfied with the information (P=0.00), and showed more accurate risk perceptions. Timing of the DA had no effect on any of the outcomes. No interactions were found between the DA and history of cancer. In conclusion, women being tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation benefit from the DA on information related outcomes. Because timing had no effect, the DA is considered useful either before or after the test result.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Decision Making , Decision Support Techniques , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Patient Education as Topic , Adult , Attitude to Health , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Pamphlets , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...