Retrospective Medical Record Review to Describe Use of Repository Corticotropin Injection Among Patients with Uveitis in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) has immune-modulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and is approved for multiple indications, including severe and acute chronic allergic and inflammatory processes involving the eye and adnexa. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and physicians' assessments of patients with uveitis treated with RCI. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical record review of US patients. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of uveitis, received RCI in the past 12 months, and had completed or were receiving RCI treatment at the time of data collection. Baseline characteristics and after-treatment clinical data are descriptively reported. RESULTS: The study included 91 patients (mean age 41 years, 62% female, and mean time since diagnosis 3.98 years). Most patients had moderate (n = 48, 53%) to severe (n = 21, 23%) visual impairment, and none was blind before RCI therapy. Patients used an average of 2.5 medications before RCI. Initial RCI dosing regimens, dose adjustments, and treatment durations were different for each patient. Concomitant medication use and dosages were reduced during RCI; 76 patients (84%) improved, 15 patients (16%) stayed the same, and none worsened; 86% of patients had improvements in vision. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians individualized RCI therapy among patients who suffered uveitis for several years and when previous therapies were inadequate. Most patients improved after initiating RCI, most commonly in vision. The findings support use of RCI for uveitis and provide a better understanding of patient characteristics and practice patterns to guide appropriate use.

Using educational games to promote the seeking of a pharmacist and to teach key medication use messages: results from an inner city health party.

BACKGROUND: Low health literacy affects 80-90 million Americans with low-income, minority populations being more vulnerable to this condition. One method of addressing limited literacy that may be particularly well accepted within vulnerable populations is the use of educational board games in order to emphasize seeking health information from reliable sources such as pharmacists. OBJECTIVE: The research objective was to determine if the use of educational board games could impact community pharmacy patron intentions to seek pharmacist advice in an urban, minority, economically-disadvantaged population. METHODS: Four medication-related educational games were played at an urban community pharmacy under the leadership of pharmacy students in the setting of a health party. Game messages, design, and evaluation processes were uniquely guided by community members' input. A verbally administered questionnaire measured game impact via knowledge and perception questions with responses compared between a non-randomly allocated intervention group and a control group. RESULTS: Ninety-nine adults were included in the intervention (or game) group and 94 adults were in the control group. Game participants were significantly more likely than the control group to indicate they would seek pharmacist medication advice in the future. CONCLUSION: Educational board games played in the setting of a health party can be a fun and effective way to convey selected health messages within an urban, minority, economically disadvantaged population. Community input into game development and layering multiple strategies for overcoming health literacy barriers were essential components of this initiative.