Indications and outcome after lung transplantation in children under 12 years of age: A 16-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Paediatric lung transplantation poses unique management challenges. Experience regarding indications and outcome is scarce, especially in younger children. The primary aim of this study was to investigate outcome after first lung transplantation in children <12 years of age in comparison to adolescents (12-17 years old). METHODS: Records of patients <18 years who underwent first lung transplantation between 01/2005 and 01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and compared between children <12 years old and adolescents. Median (IQR) follow-up was 51 (23-91) months. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients underwent first lung transplantation at our institution, of whom 42 (35.8%) patients were <12 years and 75 (64.2%) ≥12 years old. Compared to adolescents, children were more often transplanted for interstitial lung disease (33.3% vs 12%, p = 0.005) and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (28.6% vs 12%, p = 0.025), and required more often intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (31% vs 14.7%, p = 0.036) and postoperative ECMO support (47.6% vs 13.3%, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, children required longer ventilation times (78 vs 18 hours, p = 0.009) and longer ICU stay (9.5 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) compared to their older counterparts. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (9.5% vs 9.3%, p = 0.999), in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 6.7%, p = 0.418), graft survival (80% vs 62%, p = 0.479) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (76% vs 59%, p = 0.41) at 8-year follow-up did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation in children under 12 years is challenging due to underlying medical conditions and operative complexity. Nevertheless, outcomes are comparable to those in older children.

Long-term outcomes after intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has replaced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation at our institution. In this study, we present our experience using intraoperative ECMO in isolated lung transplantation and evaluate its impact on long-term graft function and survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated lung transplantation with or without ECMO support between January 2010 and June 2019 were evaluated. Patients transplanted using CPB were excluded. Peri-operative and follow-up results from our database and patient charts were analyzed. Follow-up continued until September 1, 2019 (median, 3.34 years). RESULTS: In total, 311 of 1,161 lung transplant recipients (27%) received intraoperative ECMO, with 24 (2%) patients further requiring CPB. None of the remaining 826 (71%) patients required intraoperative cardiopulmonary support. ECMO patients exhibited higher pre-transplant surgical risk profiles and endured more complicated early post-operative courses than those without ECMO (in-hospital mortality, 10.9% vs 2.3%; p < 0.001). Inevitably, this resulted in poorer overall graft survival among ECMO recipients (p = 0.0025). However, correcting for patients surviving to hospital discharge, no difference in survival between groups was observed (5-year survival, 71% vs 72%; p = 0.56). Similarly, freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, biopsy-confirmed cellular rejection, or need for pulsed-steroid therapy did not differ between the groups (p = 0.99, p = 0.78, and p = 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients not requiring cardiopulmonary support, ECMO recipients endured a more complicated peri-operative and early post-operative course. However, among those surviving to hospital discharge, no differences in long-term complications or outcomes were observed.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation may not impact overall mortality risk after transplantation: results from a 7-year single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has an important role in bridging patients to lung transplantation. In this study, we present our experience with pretransplant ECMO during the last 7 years and investigate its impact on graft outcomes. METHODS: Records of all lung-transplanted patients at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Graft survival was compared between patients who required pretransplant ECMO (pre-Tx ECMO+) and patients who did not (pre-Tx ECMO-). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality and graft survival were identified using a binary logistic regression and the Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 917 patients transplanted during the study period, 68 (7%) required ECMO as a bridge to transplantation [awake strategy, n = 57 (84%) patients]. Median bridging time was 9 days. Among pre-Tx ECMO+ patients, the need for haemodialysis at any point during bridging emerged as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 7.79, 95% confidence interval 1.21-50.24; P = 0.031). Although in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in pre-Tx ECMO+ versus pre-Tx ECMO- patients (15% vs 5%, P = 0.003), overall graft survival did not differ between groups (79% vs 90% and 61% vs 68% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, P = 0.13). Pretransplant ECMO did not emerge as a risk factor for graft survival in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: If applied in selected patients in a high-volume centre, pretransplant ECMO as a bridge to transplantation results in impaired, but still high in-hospital, survival and does not impact graft survival.

Pressure level required during prolonged cerebral perfusion time has no impact on neurological outcome: a propensity score analysis of 800 patients undergoing selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.

OBJECTIVES: Operating on the aortic arch is a surgical challenge involving various periods of circulatory arrest. Deep hypothermia is used to protect the brain. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) is employed to protect the brain and enable cerebral ischaemia time to be prolonged. However, there is no standardized SACP protocol. Our centre has performed flow- and pressure-controlled bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion since 1999. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential relationship between perfusion pressure and neurological outcome, and to examine whether the selective application of higher cerebral perfusion pressure results in better neurological outcomes. METHODS: Prospectively recorded data of 800 patients undergoing selective cerebral perfusion during aortic surgery were collected. Using stratification, patients were clustered into three subgroups according to the postoperative neurological complication severity to assess any differences in antegrade cerebral perfusion pressure or flow. Furthermore, using the cluster analysis, a total of 50 patients were selected for a high cerebral perfusion group and another 51 patients for a low cerebral perfusion group. A propensity score was used to 're-randomize' the two groups to evaluate comparability. Finally, statistical analyses of the postoperative neurological outcome were performed. RESULTS: Flow-managed, pressure-controlled cerebral perfusion provided sufficient cerebral tissue perfusion. We observed no association between antegrade cerebral perfusion conditions and the rate of neurological complications after stratifying all patients in the three subgroups. There was no difference in the rate of neurological complication between the groups with high (mean: 79.61 ± 14.97 mmHg) versus low (mean: 53.64 ± 12.09 mmHg) selective cerebral perfusion pressure, either. CONCLUSIONS: We hereby present SACP data as a real-time curve, based on a large patient cohort containing a total of 800 patients. Our perfusion strategy employing a lower selective cerebral perfusion pressure (∼50 vs ∼80 mmHg) is not associated with a higher rate of neurological complications during aortic surgery. This finding demonstrates that this perfusion strategy is a safe protocol in a clinical setting for a large cohort.

Five-year experience with intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: Indications and midterm results.

BACKGROUND: Since April 2010, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has replaced cardiopulmonary bypass for intraoperative support during lung transplantation at our institution. The aim of this study was to present our 5-year experience with this technique. METHODS: Records of patients who underwent transplantation between April 2010 and January 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent transplantation without ECMO formed Group A. Patients in whom the indication for ECMO support was set a priori before the beginning of the operation formed Group B. The remaining patients in whom the indication for ECMO support was set during transplantation formed Group C. RESULTS: Among 595 patients, 425 (71%) patients (Group A) did not require intraoperative ECMO; the remaining 170 (29%) patients did. Among these patients, 95 (56%) patients formed Group B, and the remaining 75 (44%) patients comprised Group C. Pulmonary fibrosis and pre-operative dilated or hypertrophied right ventricle emerged as risk factors for the indication of non-a priori intraoperative ECMO. Patients in Groups B and C showed a higher pre-operative risk profile and higher prevalence of post-operative complications than patients in Group A. Overall survival at 1 year was 93%, 83%, and 82% and at 4 years was 73%, 68%, and 69% in Groups A, B, and C (p = 0.11). The intraoperative use of ECMO did not emerge as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality or mortality after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ECMO filled the gap between pre-operative and post-operative ECMO in lung transplantation. Although complications and in-hospital mortality were higher in patients who received ECMO, survival was similar among patients who underwent transplantation with or without ECMO.

Veno-veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure with severe haemodynamic impairment: technique and early outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with respiratory failure may benefit from veno-venous and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. We report on our initial experience of veno-veno-arterial (v-v-a) ECMO in patients with respiratory failure. METHODS: Between January 2012 and February 2014, 406 patients required ECMO support at our institution. Here, we retrospectively analysed the characteristics and outcomes of patients commenced on either veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO due to respiratory failure, and then switched to v-v-a ECMO. RESULTS: Ten (2%) patients proceeded to v-v-a ECMO. The underlying conditions were acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 3), end-stage pulmonary fibrosis (n = 5) and respiratory failure after major thoracic surgery (n = 1) and Caesarean section (n = 1). In all of these patients, ECMO was initially started as veno-venous (n = 9) or veno-arterial (n = 1) ECMO but was switched to a veno-veno-arterial (v-v-a) approach after a mean of 2 (range, 0-7) days. Reasons for switching were: haemodynamic instability (right heart failure, n = 5; pericardial tamponade, n = 1; severe mitral valve regurgitation, n = 1; haemodynamic instability following cardiopulmonary resuscitation, n = 1 and evidence of previously unknown atrial septal defect with pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger syndrome, n = 1) and upper-body hypoxaemia (n = 1). ECMO-related complications were bleeding (n = 3) and leg ischaemia (n = 2). Seven patients were successfully taken off ECMO with 4 being bridged to recovery and a further 3 to lung transplantation after a mean of 11 (range, 9-18) days. Five patients survived until hospital discharge and all of them were alive at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Veno-veno-arterial ECMO is a technically feasible rescue strategy in treating patients presenting with combined respiratory and haemodynamic failure.