Sleep-related breathing disorders in young orthodontic patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to find out the frequency of sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) in young orthodontic patients in Israel. SRBD is characterized by prolonged upper airway obstruction during sleep. METHODS: The study group consisted of 309 children aged 6-17 years who attended the Orthodontic Clinic at Hadassah Medical Center. Parents were asked to complete a translated validated Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the examined children, 10% were at high risk for SRBD. Boys were at higher risk for SRBD and were at high risk at a younger age than girls. Girls had a low risk of SRBD after adenotonsillectomy, whereas 50% of the boys that underwent adenotonsillectomy were at high risk for SRBD. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose that 10% of the children aged 6-17 years, who were seeking orthodontic consultation at our medical center, were at high risk for SRBD. Boys were significantly at a higher risk for SRBD than girls and were at high risk at a younger age. It is important to screen young orthodontic patients for SRBD and to refer high-risk patients to their physicians for further evaluation and treatment.

Evaluation of oral mucosal diseases: inter- and intra-observer analyses.

BACKGROUND: Essential to the diagnosis and management of oral mucosal diseases are visual evaluation and monitoring of the oral cavity. Digital photography has recently become an important clinical tool. The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate inter- and intra-observer differences between oral medicine and other dental specialists when assessing changes in oral mucosal pathology and (ii) assess the influence of calibration labels incorporated into the clinical images on the reliability and consistency of evaluation. METHODS: Ten oral medicine specialists (OM) and 10 other dental specialists (DS) participated in the study. Pairs of images captured with an intraoral camera at two time points from 17 cases of mucosal diseases were presented to the participants. Each pair of photographs was presented with a calibration label (showing length and white to black hues) and again without one. The participants were asked to respond to a questionnaire evaluating changes in size, color, location, and severity for each image pair. RESULTS: Oral medicine specialists had better absolute agreement and consistency than DS when evaluating the changes in the images; however, these parameters did not exceed 52% in either group. The incorporation of a calibration label in the images increased agreement and consistency of evaluations in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up evaluations of oral mucosal lesions are performed better by oral medicine practitioners compared to other dental specialists. The incorporation of a calibration label in the clinical images seems to enhance evaluation.