ABSTRACT
Introduction Orthognathic surgical procedures include a series of surgical operations in which interventions are applied to the maxilla, mandible, or both for occlusal or aesthetic concerns due to facial skeletal development deformities. Double-jaw surgeries have the highest pain scores, in which both maxilla and mandible bones are intervened. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of individual applications of paracetamol and tenoxicam with their combined application on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery. Methods In this randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients undergoing double-jaw surgery were allocated into three groups, with each having 20 patients: the paracetamol group, the tenoxicam group, and the paracetamol-tenoxicam combination group. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at intervals of 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and again at the 24th postoperative hour. Additionally, the consumption of opioids and other rescue analgesics was documented over the 24-hour postoperative period. Results The VAS values at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 24 hours were lower in the paracetamol-tenoxicam group compared to the other groups (p<0.001). The need for a rescue analgesic drug in the first 24 hours was not observed in the tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam groups. Conclusion It was concluded that both tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam combinations, especially the tenoxicam-paracetamol combination, were good options for postoperative analgesia in patients with double-jaw surgery.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is generally preferred for maxillofacial surgery to provide a more suitable and wide surgery area for the surgeons. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether using a nasal airway just before the NTI may facilitate NTI or not. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, and controlled study was performed on patients who were admitted to our hospital for maxillofacial surgery. In group 1, a nasal airway was used just before the NTI during mask ventilation, and patients in the group were ventilated without nasal airway. Airway group was the primary predictor of the study. The NTI duration was the primary outcome variable, and the number of attempts was the secondary outcome variable. Difficulty of ventilation and complications were the other variables that were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in the study and divided into 2 groups. There was no statistically significant relationship between the duration of NTI and other variables, but the significance value for sternomental distance, ventilation difficulty, and epistaxis was P < .10. The NTI duration (the primary outcome variable) and the number of attempts (the secondary outcome variable) are statistically lower in the nasal airway group (group 1) than the control group (group 2). Ventilation difficulty was significantly higher in group 2 when compared with group 1 (P = .04). The model and regression coefficients for both variables are statistically significant in terms of duration of NTI and number of attempt values that they were lower in nasal airway group than the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of complications (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study has shown that inserting a nasal airway into the nostril just before the NTI may facilitate the intubation process by preparing the nasal passage.
