A Survey of Residents/Fellows, Program Directors, and Faculty About Telepsychiatry: Clinical Experience, Interest, and Views/Concerns.

The effectiveness of telepsychiatry video for clinical care is well established, and clinician and psychiatry resident interest in it is growing-particularly in light of the COVID-19 impact. Still, few residency programs in the United States have core curricula, rotations/electives available, and competencies, and many faculty have no experience. A survey was sent via national organization listserves for residents, fellows, faculty, and program directors to complete. The survey queried demographics, clinical experience and interest, and views/concerns, using Likert-like and yes/no questions. Descriptive statistics and other analyses compared the groups to assess impact of clinical experience on interest and views/concerns. Respondents (N = 270) have limited clinical experience with telepsychiatry (46% none), with trainees having less than others, and yet, most were very interested or interested in it (68%). Trainees (N = 123) have concerns about being prepared for future practice. Clinical experience with video in the range of 6-20 h appears to dramatically increase interest and reduce concerns, though less time has a positive effect. Respondents have concerns about connectivity, medico-legal issues, and clinical effectiveness (e.g., diverse populations, psychosis, and emergencies) with telepsychiatry. More research is needed to assess current clinical and curricular experience, interest, and concerns. Additional curricular interventions during residency and fellowship training could build skills and confidence, if this is feasible, and the benefits outweigh the costs.

A Survey Comparing Adult and Child Psychiatry Trainees, Faculty, and Program Directors' Perspectives About Telepsychiatry: Implications for Clinical Care and Training.

Telepsychiatry's effectiveness is well established, and interest in it is growing, despite few residency/fellowship core curricula and rotations. A link to a cross-sectional survey was sent via national organization listservs for psychiatry residents, fellows, faculty, and program directors to complete. The survey queried demographics, clinical experience, and views/concerns about telepsychiatry. Descriptive statistics and other analyses compared groups to assess the impact of amount clinical experience and psychiatric specialty (general vs. child and adolescent psychiatry), on interest, and views/concerns about the practice of telepsychiatry. All respondents (N = 270; child psychiatry N = 89) have limited clinical experience with telepsychiatry (46% overall; 49% of non-child had none versus 40% child). Trainees (N = 123; child N = 43) expressed less interest than others. All respondents expressed worry about ability to do a physical exam, connectivity, medico-legal issues, and fit for diverse populations. Child respondents expressed less concern than others, but they reported more worry about loss of nonverbal cues. Clinical experience with telepsychiatry in the range of 6-20 h appears to build interest and allay concerns, though 1-5 h also may have a positive impact. More research is needed to assess clinical experience, interest, and concerns for adult and child psychiatry trainees and clinicians. Replicable, curricular interventions appear to be indicated.

Distinctive emotional responses of clinicians to suicide-attempting patients--a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Clinician responses to patients have been recognized as an important factor in treatment outcome. Clinician responses to suicidal patients have received little attention in the literature however, and no quantitative studies have been published. Further, although patients with high versus low lethality suicidal behaviors have been speculated to represent two distinct populations, clinicians' emotional responses to them have not been examined. METHODS: Clinicians' responses to their patients when last seeing them prior to patients' suicide attempt or death were assessed retrospectively with the Therapist Response/Countertransference Questionnaire, administered anonymously via an Internet survey service. Scores on individual items and subscale scores were compared between groups, and linear discriminant analysis was applied to determine the combination of items that best discriminated between groups. RESULTS: Clinicians reported on patients who completed suicide, made high-lethality attempts, low-lethality attempts, or died unexpected non-suicidal deaths in a total of 82 cases. We found that clinicians treating imminently suicidal patients had less positive feelings towards these patients than for non-suicidal patients, but had higher hopes for their treatment, while finding themselves notably more overwhelmed, distressed by, and to some degree avoidant of them. Further, we found that the specific paradoxical combination of hopefulness and distress/avoidance was a significant discriminator between suicidal patients and those who died unexpected non-suicidal deaths with 90% sensitivity and 56% specificity. In addition, we identified one questionnaire item that discriminated significantly between high- and low-lethality suicide patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' emotional responses to patients at risk versus not at risk for imminent suicide attempt may be distinct in ways consistent with responses theorized by Maltsberger and Buie in 1974. Prospective replication is needed to confirm these results, however. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using quantitative self-report methodologies for investigation of the relationship between clinicians' emotional responses to suicidal patients and suicide risk.