Pathological gambling in eating disorders: prevalence and clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE: Pathological gambling (PG) and eating disorders (ED) rarely co-occur. We explored the prevalence of lifetime PG in ED, compared severity of ED symptoms, personality traits, and psychopathological profiles across individuals with ED and PG (ED+PG) and without PG (ED-PG). Finally, we assessed the incremental predictive value of gender on the presentation of a comorbid PG. METHOD: A total sample of 1681 consecutively admitted ED patients (1576 females and 105 males), participated in the current study (25 ED+PG and 1656 ED-PG). All participants were diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Assessment measures included the Symptom Checklist and the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised, as well as other clinical and psychopathological indices. RESULTS: The observed lifetime prevalence of PG was 1.49%. ED subtype was associated with lifetime PG (p=.003), with PG being more frequent in binge eating disorder (5.7%). ED+PG was more prevalent in males than in females (16% vs. 1.26%, respectively). Additionally, ED+PG patients exhibited more impulsive behaviours, lower impulse regulation and higher novelty seeking. Best predictors of ED+PG were novelty seeking (OR 1.030, p=.035), sex (OR 3.295, p=.048) and BMI (OR 1.081, p=.005). CONCLUSIONS: Some personality traits (novelty seeking), being male and higher BMI are strongly related to the presence of lifetime PG in specific ED subtypes (namely binge eating disorder).

Gambling on the stock market: an unexplored issue.

OBJECTIVE: Stock market investment (SMI) is one of the most socially acceptable types of gambling, which, however, can turn into a gambling problem. Because it is barely examined, we compared a series of clinical, psychopathologic, and personality variables in SMI gambling patients (both as primary and secondary problem) with a group of traditional pathologic gamblers (PGs). METHOD: A total sample of 1470 PGs (1376 patients without SMIs [PG-SMI], 76 patients with SMI as a secondary gambling problem [PG+SMI], and 18 patients with SMI as a primary gambling problem [SMI+PG]) participated in this study. All participants were diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. The following instruments were used: the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the Symptom Check List-90 Items-Revised, the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised, and other clinical and psychopathologic indices. RESULTS: The 3 patient groups' profiles were statistically similar in psychometrical measures. The risk of having SMI increased for patients with higher education, and the presence of SMI as a primary problem in PGs increased with university study level and higher scores on the personality trait of cooperativeness. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate comparability of SMI gamblers with PGs in their general clinical profile and in psychopathology and personality.