Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 11(12)2021 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599810

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila genome contains approximately 14,000 protein-coding genes encoding all the necessary information to sustain cellular physiology, tissue organization, organism development, and behavior. In this manuscript, we describe in some detail the phenotypes in the adult fly wing generated after knockdown of approximately 80% of Drosophila genes. We combined this phenotypic description with a comprehensive molecular classification of the Drosophila proteins into classes that summarize the main expected or known biochemical/functional aspect of each protein. This information, combined with mRNA expression levels and in situ expression patterns, provides a simplified atlas of the Drosophila genome, from housekeeping proteins to the components of the signaling pathways directing wing development, that might help to further understand the contribution of each gene group to wing formation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Phenotype , RNA Interference , Wings, Animal/metabolism
2.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 11(12)2021 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599819

ABSTRACT

We have screened a collection of UAS-RNAi lines targeting 10,920 Drosophila protein-coding genes for phenotypes in the adult wing. We identified 3653 genes (33%) whose knockdown causes either larval/pupal lethality or a mutant phenotype affecting the formation of a normal wing. The most frequent phenotypes consist of changes in wing size, vein differentiation, and patterning, defects in the wing margin and in the apposition of the dorsal and ventral wing surfaces. We also defined 16 functional categories encompassing the most relevant aspect of each protein function and assigned each Drosophila gene to one of these functional groups. This allowed us to identify which mutant phenotypes are enriched within each functional group. Finally, we used previously published gene expression datasets to determine which genes are or are not expressed in the wing disc. Integrating expression, phenotypic and molecular information offers considerable precision to identify the relevant genes affecting wing formation and the biological processes regulated by them.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Phenotype , RNA Interference , Wings, Animal/metabolism
3.
Dev Biol ; 461(2): 172-183, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061885

ABSTRACT

Ras1 (Ras85D) and Ras2 (Ras64B) are the Drosophila orthologs of human H-Ras/N-Ras/K-Ras and R-Ras1-3 genes, respectively. The function of Ras1 has been thoroughly characterised during Drosophila embryonic and imaginal development, and it is associated with coupling activated trans-membrane receptors with tyrosine kinase activity to their downstream effectors. In this capacity, Ras1 binds and is required for the activation of Raf. Ras1 can also interact with PI3K, and it is needed to achieve maximal levels of PI3K signalling in specific cellular settings. In contrast, the function of the unique Drosophila R-Ras member (Ras2/Ras64B), which is more closely related to vertebrate R-Ras2/TC21, has been only studied through the use of constitutively activated forms of the protein. This pioneering work identified a variety of phenotypes that were related to those displayed by Ras1, suggesting that Ras1 and Ras2 might have overlapping activities. Here we find that Ras2 can interact with PI3K and Raf and activate their downstream effectors Akt and Erk. However, and in contrast to mutants in Ras1, which are lethal, null alleles of Ras2 are viable in homozygosis and only show a phenotype of reduced wing size and extended life span that might be related to reduced Insulin receptor signalling.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Insulin/physiology , Membrane Proteins/physiology , ras Proteins/physiology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , ErbB Receptors , Female , Gene Editing , Genetic Association Studies , Longevity/genetics , Male , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Protein Interaction Mapping , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/physiology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/physiology , Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Signal Transduction/physiology , Wings, Animal/growth & development , Wings, Animal/ultrastructure , ras Proteins/genetics
4.
Transcription ; 7(1): 32-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26735242

ABSTRACT

The core of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) is formed by transcription factors (TF) and cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) present in their downstream genes. GRNs have a modular structure in which complex circuitries link TFs to CRMs to generate specific transcriptional outputs. (1) Of particular interest are those GRNs including cell fate-determining genes, as they constitute developmental switches which activity is necessary and sufficient to promote particular cellular fates. Most of the genetic analysis of developmental processes deals with the composition and structure of GRNs acting upstream of cell fate-determining genes, as they are best suited for genetic analysis and molecular deconstruction. More recently, the application of a variety of in vivo, computational and genome-wide approaches is allowing the identification and functional analysis of GRNs acting downstream of cell fate-determining genes. In this review we discuss several examples of GRNs acting upstream and downstream of cell fate-determining genes, including other TFs which activity pervade across both regulatory networks.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Regulatory Networks , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
5.
PLoS Genet ; 11(8): e1005370, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26241320

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila genes spalt major (salm) and spalt-related (salr) encode Zn-finger transcription factors regulated by the Decapentaplegic (Dpp) signalling pathway in the wing imaginal disc. The function of these genes is required for cell survival and proliferation in the central region of the wing disc, and also for vein patterning in the lateral regions. The identification of direct Salm and Salr target genes, and the analysis of their functions, are critical steps towards understanding the genetic control of growth and patterning of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc by the Dpp pathway. To identify candidate Salm/Salr target genes, we have compared the expression profile of salm/salr knockdown wing discs with control discs in microarray experiments. We studied by in situ hybridization the expression pattern of the genes whose mRNA levels varied significantly, and uncovered a complex transcription landscape regulated by the Spalt proteins in the wing disc. Interestingly, candidate Salm/Salr targets include genes which expression is turned off and genes which expression is positively regulated by Salm/Salr. Furthermore, loss-of-function phenotypic analysis of these genes indicates, for a fraction of them, a requirement for wing growth and patterning. The identification and analysis of candidate Salm/Salr target genes opens a new avenue to reconstruct the genetic structure of the wing, linking the activity of the Dpp pathway to the development of this epithelial tissue.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/physiology , Repressor Proteins/physiology , Transcription Factors/physiology , Transcriptome , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Gene Ontology , Imaginal Discs/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Signal Transduction
6.
Biol Open ; 2(1): 37-48, 2013 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23336075

ABSTRACT

The expression of the spalt genes is regulated by the Decapentaplegic signalling pathway in the Drosophila wing. These genes participate in the patterning of the longitudinal wing veins by regulating the expression of vein-specific genes, and in the establishment of cellular affinities in the central region of the wing blade epithelium. The Spalt proteins act as transcription factors, most likely regulating gene expression by repression, but the identity of their target genes in the wing is still unknown. As a preliminary step to unravel the genetic hierarchy controlled by the Spalt proteins, we have analysed their requirements during wing development, and addressed to what extent they mediate all the functions of the Decapentaplegic pathway in this developmental system. We identify additional functions for Spalt in cell division, survival, and maintenance of epithelial integrity. Thus, Spalt activity is required to promote cell proliferation, acting in the G2/M transition of the cell cycle. The contribution of Spalt to cell division is limited to the central region of the wing blade, as they do not mediate the extra growth triggered by Decapentaplegic signalling in the peripheral regions of the wing disc. In addition, Spalt function is required to maintain cell viability in cells exposed to high levels of Decapentaplegic signalling. This aspect of Spalt function is related to the repression of JNK signalling in the spalt domain of expression. Finally, we further characterise the requirements of Spalt to maintain epithelial integrity by regulating cellular affinities between cells located in the central wing region. Our results indicate that Spalt function mediates most of the requirements identified for Decapentaplegic signalling, contributing to establish the cellular qualities that differentiate central versus peripheral territories in the wing blade.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...