High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with regard to image quality and assessment of breast cancer morphology

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality and tumor morphology depiction ability of high resolution (HR) diffusion- weighted imaging (f-DWI) in comparison to conventional DWI (c-DWI) and dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in the primary breast cancer setting. METHODS: The f-DWI, c-DWI, and DCE-MRIs of 160 malignant breast masses were evaluated retrospectively by two independent radiologists. Data on image quality [sharpness, distortion, and perceived signalto- noise ratio (SNR)], apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, lesion size, and tumor morphology (shape, margin, and internal pattern) obtained on f-DWI, c-DWI, and DCE-MRI were compared. Consistency between the readers and imaging methods for morphological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: The ADC values measured on f-DWI were significantly lower than those measured on c-DWI for both readers (P < 0.001 for each), whereas mean lesion size was significantly larger in c-DWI than in f-DWI and DCE-MRI for both readers (P < 0.001 for each). Higher consistency values were obtained for f-DWI compared with c-DWI when correlated with DCE-MRI for each morphological parameter. The least distorted images were obtained using DCE-MRI compared with c-DWI and f-DWI for both readers, whereas the highest distortion scores were obtained using c-DWI. Sharpness and perceived SNR scores were rated as significantly higher for f-DWI and DCE-MRI images compared with c-DWI by both readers (P < 0.001 for all). The concordance between c-DWI and DCE-MRI was fair to slight (κ = 0.15 to 0.41), whereas concordance between f-DWI and DCE-MRI was significantly better (κ = 0.68 to 0.87) for each reader and for all morphological parameters (P < 0.001). The highest concordance between the readers was achieved in margin assessment (κ = 0.87 to 0.89) regardless of the MRI method, followed by shape and internal pattern parameters (κ = 0.63 to 0.79). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that f-DWI produces higher-quality images than c-DWI, enabling the morphological features to be identified in similar detail to that offered by HR DCE-MRI. Accordingly, f-DWI, as a method that highly correlates with DCE in determining the morphological characteristics of breast cancers, seems to have potential in the evaluation of breast tumors in patients for whom the use of contrast media is contraindicated.

A comparison study of dual-energy spectral CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary tumors and lymph nodes of lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether there is a correlation between dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DESCT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters in primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. METHODS: Primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes of 68 patients diagnosed with lung cancer were evaluated retrospectively with 18F-FDG PET/CT and DESCT imaging. The histologic subtypes were adenocarcinoma (n=29), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n=26), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=11), and large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) (n=2). In terms of PET parameters, SUVmax, SUVmean, SULmax, SULmean, SULpeak, and normalized SUL values were obtained for primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In terms of DESCT parameters, maximum and mean iodine content (IC), normalized IC values, iodine enhancement (IE) and normalized IE values were calculated. RESULTS: We found no correlation between DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In addition, no correlation was found in the analysis performed in any of the histologic subgroups. In patients with a primary tumor <3 cm, there was a moderate negative correlation between the parameters SUVmax-ICmax (r= -0.456, p = 0.043), SUVmean-ICmax (r= -0.464, p = 0.039) SULmean-ICmax (r= -0.497, p = 0.026), SUVmax-ICmean (r= -0.527, p = 0.020), SULmean-ICmean (r= -0.499, p = 0.025), and SULpeak-ICmean (r= -0.488, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: We consider that DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT indicate different characteristics of the tumors and should not supersede each other.