ABSTRACT
AIM: IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common glomerulopathy worldwide and in Uruguay, raised treatment controversies. The study aimed to analyze long-term IgAN outcomes and treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a Uruguayan IgAN cohort, enrolled between 1985 and 2009 and followed up until 2020, was performed. The Ethics Committee approved the study. The inclusion criteria were (a) biopsy-proven IgAN; (b) age ≥12 years; and (c) available clinical, histologic, and treatment data. The patients were divided into two groups, with immunosuppressive (IS) or without (NoIS) treatment. Outcomes (end-stage kidney disease/kidney replacement therapy [ESKD/KRT] or all-cause death) were obtained from mandatory national registries. RESULTS: The study population included 241 patients (64.7% men), median age 32 (19.5) years, baseline blood pressure <130/80 mmHg in 37%, and microhematuria in 67.5% of patients. Baseline proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and a higher crescent percentage were significantly more frequent in the IS group. Proteinuria improved in both groups. Renal survival at 20 years was 74.6% without difference between groups. In the overall population and in the NoIS group, bivariate Cox regression analysis showed that baseline proteinuria, endocapillary hypercellularity, tubule interstitial damage, and crescents were associated with a higher risk of ESKD/KRT or death, but in the IS group, proteinuria and endocapillary hypercellularity were not. In the multivariate Cox analysis, proteinuria in the NoIS group, crescents in the IS group and tubule interstitial damage in both groups were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: The IS group had more severe risk factors than the NoIS group but attained a similar outcome.
Subject(s)
Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Male , Humans , Adult , Child , Female , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Risk Factors , Proteinuria/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Humans , Peritonitis/etiology , Peritonitis/epidemiology , Peritoneal Dialysis , Epidemiological Monitoring , UruguayABSTRACT
La peritonitis es una complicación grave de la diálisis peritoneal (DP), por lo que interesa conocer la incidencia y sensibilidad antibiótica de los gérmenes causantes. En Uruguay, desde el 1° de enero de 2004, se realiza un registro nacional de las peritonitis en DP, gérmenes, sensibilidad y evolución. Método: se analizaron los registros desde el 1° de enero de 2004 al 31 de diciembre de 2013. El registro fue aprobado por comités de ética institucionales. Resultados: en el período se registraron 850 peritonitis, con una incidencia que descendió de 0,49/paciente-año (2004-2005) a 0,37/paciente-año (2013). La incidencia de Staphylococcus aureus y Staphylococcus coagulasa negativo (SCoN) fue menor en 2009-2013 vs 2004-2005 (0,2 vs 0,12 peritonitis/paciente-año, test Poisson p<0,05). En 2009-2013: 14/54 S. aureus y 26/71 SCoN fueron meticilinorresistente, similar al período previo. El 98% de los gérmenes gramnegativos fueron sensibles a amikacina. En 145/467 (31%) episodios no se identificó germen. Se logró cura primaria en 71% de las peritonitis por grampositivos y en 45% por gramnegativos (chi2 p<0,05). En 2013 se observó mayor incidencia de peritonitis en los centros en los que no se controló el estado de portador nasal. Comentarios y conclusiones: se justifica implementar el control de portador de Staphylococcus aureus. La incidencia de peritonitis por S. aureus y SCoN meticilinorresistentes, la incidencia sostenida de gérmenes gramnegativos (con peor evolución), y el elevado porcentaje de cultivos sin desarrollo justifica mantener el protocolo antibiótico empírico inicial con vancomicina y amikacina. El descenso de la incidencia de S. aureus + SCoN podría ser atribuido a una mejor educación de los pacientes en DP.
Abstract Peritonitis is a severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), so it is important to learn about the incidence and antibiotic sensitivity of the germs that cause it. In Uruguay, since January 1, 2004, a national record is kept for peritonitis in PD, germs, sensitivity and evolution. Method: the records from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2013 were analyzed. The registry was approved by institutional ethical committes. Results: during the above mentioned period, 850 cases of peritonitis were recorded, and incidence dropped from 0.49/patient-year (2004-2005) to 0.37/patient-year (2013). Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCoN) was lower in 2009-2013 vs 2004-2005 (0.2 vs 0.12 peritonitis/patient-year, test Poisson p<0.05). In 2009-2013: 14/54 S. aureus and 26/71 SCoN were methicillin-resistant, similar to the previous period. 98% of Gram-negative were sensitive to amikacin. No germ was identified in 145/467 (31%) of episodes. Primary cure was achieved in 71% of peritonitis for Gram-positive and 45% for Gram-negative bacteria (chi2 p<0.05). In 2013 a greater incidence of peritonitis was observed in those centers where the nasal carriage was not controlled. Comments and conclusions: controlling Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriages is worth doing. The incidence of peritonitis by methicillin-resistant S. aureus y SCoN, the sustained incidence of Gram-negative germs (with a worse evolution), and the high percentage of cultures with no development justify keeping the initial empirical antibiotic protocol with vancomycin and amikacin. Reduction in the incidence of S. aureus + SCoN could be explained by a greater education in PD patients.
Resumo A peritonite é uma complicação grave da diálise peritoneal (DP), sendo, portanto, importante conhecer a incidência e a sensibilidade antibiótica dos gérmens causadores. No Uruguai, desde 1 de janeiro de 2004, realiza-se um registro nacional das peritonites em DP, com dados sobre gérmens, sensibilidade e evolução. Método: foram analisados os registros do período 1 de janeiro de 2004 - 31 de dezembro de 2013. O registro foi aprovado pelos comitês de ética das instituições envolvidas. Resultados: foram registradas 850 peritonites no período estudado; a incidência diminuiu de 0,49/paciente-ano no período 2004-2005 a 0,37/paciente-ano em 2013. A incidência de Staphylococcus aureus e Staphylococcus coagulase negativo (SCoN) foi menor no período 2009-2013 comparada com 2004-2005 (0,2 vs 0,12 peritonite/paciente-ano, teste de Poisson p<0,05). No período 2009-2013: 14/54 S. aureus e 26/71 SCoN foram resistentes à meticilina, similar ao período prévio. 98% dos gérmens gramnegativos eram sensíveis a amicacina. Não se pode identificar o gérmen em 145/467 (31%) episódios. Em 71% das peritonites por grampositivos e em 5% por gramnegativos (chi2 p<0,05) foi possível obter cura primária. Em 2013 foi observada uma maior incidência de peritonite nos centros em que não se realizava controle de portador nasal. Comentários e conclusões: justifica-se a realização de controle de portador de Staphylococcus aureus. A incidência de peritonite por S. aureus e SCoN resistentes à meticilina, a incidência constante de gérmens gramnegativos (com pior evolução), e a alta porcentagem de cultivos sem crescimento justificam manter o protocolo antibiótico empírico inicial com vancomicina e amicacina. A redução da incidência de S. aureus + SCoN poderia ser atribuída a melhor educação dos pacientes em DP.
Subject(s)
Humans , Peritonitis/etiology , Peritonitis/epidemiology , Uruguay/epidemiology , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Uruguay is a South American country (3241003 inhabitants) where renal replacement treatment is universally available. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and outcome of peritonitis, and the causative organisms and their sensitivity, in order to recommend an empiric initial antibiotic treatment. A retrospective descriptive study of all peritonitis during the period 2004-2005 was performed (144 peritonitis, 44% due to gram-positive bacteria). We conclude that the high prevalence of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci justifies the use of vancomycin in the national empiric initial antibiotic protocols.
