Depth and Quality of Recommendations in Popular Sources About How to Play with Infants: Content Analysis.

AIM: Systematically evaluate the depth and quality of play recommendations provided in popular sources for parents of infants in the first year of life. METHODS: This represents the second stage of a larger analysis of educational content available to parents. Two coders (>90% agreement) extracted and coded play activities from popular websites, applications, and books screened from a systematic online search. Depth of instruction variables were extracted. Activity quality was rated based on opportunities for child-initiated movement, problem-solving with objects, and responsive communication. RESULTS: 4370 play activities from 214 sources were analyzed. Activities were likely to suggest specific ages for infants and that a caregiver be present. Less than half of the activities incorporated toys or provided guidance about how to position or physically support infants. Activity quality was low; most activities did not explicitly encourage parents to provide opportunities for child-initiated movement, problem-solving with objects, or quality communication. CONCLUSIONS: Parents may encounter a large number of play activities in popular sources, but the depth of instruction and quality of those activities could be improved. Provision of higher-quality education to parents may enhance parent-child play interactions to positively impact parent and child outcomes, especially for children at risk for delays.

Information Available to Parents Seeking Education about Infant Play, Milestones, and Development from Popular Sources.

Parents commonly seek information about infant development and play, yet it is unclear what information parents find when looking in popular sources. Play, Milestone, and Development Searches in Google identified 313 sources for content analysis by trained researchers using a standardized coding scheme. Sources included websites, books, and apps created by professional organizations, commercial entities, individuals, the popular press, and government organizations/agencies. The results showed that for popular sources: (1) author information (i.e., qualifications, credentials, education/experience) is not consistently provided, nor is information about the developmental process, parents' role in development, or determining an infant's readiness to play; (2) milestones comprise a majority of the content overall; (3) search terminology impacts the information parents receive; (4) sources from the Milestone and Development Searches emphasized a passive approach of observing developmental milestones rather than suggesting activities to actively facilitate learning and milestone development. These findings highlight the need to discuss parents' online information-gathering process and findings. They also highlight the need for innovative universal parent-education programs that focus on activities to facilitate early development. This type of education has potential to benefit all families, with particular benefits for families with children who have unidentified or untreated developmental delays.

How do parents and early intervention professionals utilize educational resources about infant development and play?

BACKGROUND: Parents utilize online sources to learn about health information, however few studies have examined where parents look for information about development or play for young children. AIMS: Investigate parents' and early intervention (EI) providers' practices and preferences regarding parent education about infant development and play. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey design. SUBJECTS: 112 parents and 138 EI providers participated. OUTCOME MEASURES: One survey probed where parents look for information and preferred methods for receiving information about infant development and play. A second survey identified the parent education sources used and perceived quality of sources available by EI providers. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 112 parents and 138 EI providers participated. A greater proportion of parents sought information about development than play. Overall, parents used internet searches and preferred websites for education about development and play; however, parents of infants at risk for developmental delay preferred receiving developmental information through home visits or classes. Most EI providers have not asked parents where they look for information. A greater proportion of EI providers agreed existing sources about development, rather than about play, are high quality, but identified the need to develop high-quality sources about both topics. CONCLUSIONS: There are a variety of methods that parents access and prefer for education about infant development and play. EI providers and other healthcare professionals should discuss the methods with parents to support parents in their quest for information and ensure parents receive high-quality information.

Development and Initial Evaluation of a Soft Ankle Support for Children With Ankle Impairments.

PURPOSE: Develop and initially evaluate a soft ankle support (SAS) garment for children with ankle impairments. DESCRIPTION OF CASES: Two participants were evaluated at baseline and interviews with their parent(s) to identify wants and needs for the SAS. The SAS was developed and evaluated via participant report and functional measures in barefoot, ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), and SAS conditions. OUTCOMES: Children and parents expressed dissatisfaction with AFOs' dimensions, weight, adjustability, comfort, and ease of use. Gait and gross motor function were similar for SAS and AFOs' conditions; however, participants rated the SAS better for weight and bulk, integration with shoes, adjustability, comfort, cost, and washability. DISCUSSION: The SAS and AFOs performed similarly in this initial testing, yet the SAS also met participants' needs across key metrics not well addressed by AFOs. Ankle support devices that meet users' broad needs may support improved adherence and user satisfaction.

Users' Perceptions About Lower Extremity Orthotic Devices: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review perceptions from adults, children, and caregivers in scientific and open sources to determine how well lower extremity orthotic devices (LEODs) meet users' functional, expressive, aesthetic, and accessibility (FEA2) needs. DATA SOURCES: Scientific source searches were conducted in the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and Web of Science; open source searches were conducted in Google Search Engine in April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were reporting of users' perceptions about a LEOD, experimental or observational study design, including qualitative studies, and full text in English. Studies were excluded if the device only provided compression or perception data could not be extracted. One hundred seventy three scientific sources of 3440 screened were included (total of 1108 perceptions); 36 open sources of 150 screened were included (total of 508 perceptions). DATA EXTRACTION: Users' perceptions were independently coded by 2 trained, reliable coders. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across both source types, there were more perceptions about functional needs, and perceptions were more likely to be positive related to functional than expressive, aesthetic, or accessibility needs. Perceptions about expression, aesthetics, and accessibility were more frequently reported and more negative in open vs scientific sources. Users' perceptions varied depending on users' diagnosis and device type. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant room for improvement in how LEODs meet users' FEA2 needs, even in the area of function, which is often the primary focus when designing rehabilitation devices. Satisfaction with LEODs may be improved by addressing users' unmet needs. Individuals often choose not to use prescribed LEODs even when LEODs improve their function. This systematic review identifies needs for LEODs that are most important to users and highlights how well existing LEODs address those needs. Attention to these needs in the design, prescription, and implementation of LEODs may increase device utilization.

Multicenter Randomized Sham Controlled Study of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization (GAE) compared with a sham procedure in the treatment of knee pain secondary to mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate knee OA symptom reduction after GAE versus sham procedure. Subjects (n = 21) with mild to moderate OA and intractable knee pain were randomized 2:1 to either GAE or a sham procedure. Subjects who were randomized to the sham procedure and did not report clinical improvement in both the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were unblinded and able to crossover to treatment at 1 month. Longitudinal data were collected for 12 months, and subjects were excluded if they required additional analgesics at follow-up. Reductions in the VAS and total WOMAC scores were compared using mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS: All subjects in the sham group failed to show significant improvements at 1 month and crossed over to the treatment arm. There was a statistically significantly greater pain reduction in the treatment group than in the sham group at 1 month (VAS, 50.1 mm; standard error [SE], 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.0, 72.3; P<.01). Disability improvement was also significantly greater in the treatment group (WOMAC, 24.7 points; SE, 10.4; 95% CI, 3.5, 45.9; P=.02). Only minor adverse events were reported. Five subjects were excluded after increased analgesic use. Sensitivity analysis with all excluded patients confirmed significant improvements at 1 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with mild to moderate knee OA, GAE results in symptomatic improvement greater than the sham procedure with clinically significant reduction in pain and disability.

Results from a United States Investigational Device Study of Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization in the Treatment of Shoulder Pain: The Adhesive Capsulitis Embolization Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of arterial embolization to relieve shoulder pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 20 patients (18 females, 2 males; mean age, 51 years) with AC resistant to >30 days of conservative treatment were enrolled in a multicenter prospective study. Adhesive capsulitis embolization was performed with 75-µm or 200-µm spherical particles. Subjects were assessed before and after the procedure with magnetic resonance imaging, visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; 0-100) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES; 0-100) scores. Adverse events were recorded at all follow-up time points. RESULTS: Hypervascularity was identified and embolization was technically successful in all patients, with 83 arteries embolized in 20 patients. Baseline VAS, SANE, and ASES scores before the procedure were 89.2 mm, 27.2, and 30.9, respectively. The 1-month (n = 19), 3-month (n = 18), and 6-month (n = 12) follow-ups demonstrated significant improvements. At the 1-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 31.8 (P = 1.2E-11), SANE score increased by 22.1 (P = 1.8E-8), and ASES score increased by 14.2 (P = 4.3E-5). At the 6-month follow-up, VAS score decreased by 62.1 (P = 7.0E-11), SANE score increased by 55.4 (P = 4.1E-10), and ASES score increased by 44.5 (P = 1.8E-6). Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the study ended early; 6 patients did not complete the 6-month follow-up. No major adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Interim findings suggest that arterial embolization is safe and effective for patients with AC refractory to conservative treatment.

Reframing Clinical Paradigms: Strategies for Improving Patient Care Relationships.

This article presents strategies for reframing clinical paradigms to build better therapeutic relationships with patients and the members of their support network from the unique and important lens of a parent and disability researcher. First, a brief history of the evolution of models of care is presented, and implementation of the current biopsychosocial model is discussed. Then, evidence-based practice and the role of the patient perspective is considered. Next, specific examples, tools, techniques, guidelines, and resources to foster the demonstration of patient-informed respect and patient-centered communication in clinical practice are provided. Examples and resources are presented that can be accessed and implemented immediately, without cost to the practitioner and with the vast potential to improve care, therapeutic relationships, and patient outcomes. It is important for health care providers and researchers in all practice areas and across all experience levels to regularly evaluate their psychosocial skills. It is critical that the voices of patients and the members of their support network are central in this process. This can enable health care providers to acknowledge areas for growth and to implement changes effectively and efficiently at the individual level to facilitate changes across the broader spectrum of health care practice.

Genicular Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of embolization of hyperemic synovial tissue for the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with radiographic knee OA and moderate-to-severe pain refractory to conservative therapy were enrolled in a prospective, 2-site pilot study. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) was performed with 75- or 100-µm spherical particles. Patients were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and at 1 month and with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Adverse events were recorded at all timepoints. RESULTS: Embolization of at least 1 genicular artery was achieved in 20/20 (100%) patients. Mean VAS improved from 76 mm ± 14 at baseline to 29 mm ± 27 at 6-month follow-up (P < .01). Mean WOMAC score improved from 61 ± 12 at baseline to 29 ± 27 at 6-month follow-up (P < .01). Self-limiting skin discoloration occurred in 13/20 (65%) patients. Two of 20 (10%) patients developed plantar sensory paresthesia that resolved within 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: GAE to treat knee pain secondary to OA can be performed safely and demonstrates potential efficacy. Further randomized comparative studies are needed to determine true treatment effect versus placebo effect.

Physical activity in non-ambulatory toddlers with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy are less likely to be physically active than their peers, however there is limited evidence regarding self-initiated physical activity in toddlers who are not able, or who may never be able, to walk. AIMS: The aim of this study was to measure self-initiated physical activity and its relationship to gross motor function and participation in non-ambulatory toddlers with cerebral palsy. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Participants were between the ages of 1-3 years. Physical activity during independent floor-play at home was recorded using a wearable tri-axial accelerometer worn on the child's thigh. The Gross Motor Function Measure-66 and the Child Engagement in Daily Life, a parent-reported questionnaire of participation, were administered. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Data were analyzed from the twenty participants who recorded at least 90 min of floor-play (mean: 229 min), resulting in 4598 total floor-play minutes. The relationship between physical activity and gross motor function was not statistically significant (r = 0.20; p = 0.39), nor were the relationships between physical activity and participation (r = 0.05-0.09; p = 0.71-0.84). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest physical activity during floor-play is not related to gross motor function or participation in non-ambulatory toddlers with cerebral palsy. Clinicians and researchers should independently measure physical activity, gross motor function, and participation.

Cost Analysis of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to TURP; however, there are limited cost comparisons reported. The purpose of this study was to compare in-hospital direct costs of elective PAE and TURP in a hospital setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing PAE and TURP from January to December 2014. Inclusion criteria included male patients greater than 40 years of age who presented for ambulatory TURP or PAE with no history of prior surgical intervention for BPH. Direct costs were categorized into the following categories: nursing and operating room or interventional room staffing, operating room or interventional supply costs, anesthesia supplies, anesthesia staffing, hospital room cost, radiology, and laboratory costs. Additionally, length of stay was evaluated for both groups. RESULTS: The mean patient age for the TURP (n = 86) and PAE (n = 70) cohorts was 71.3 and 64.4 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). Intra-procedural supplies for PAE were significantly more costly than TURP ($1472.77 vs $1080.84, p < 0.0001). When including anesthesia supplies and nursing/staffing, costs were significantly more expensive for TURP than PAE ($2153.64 vs $1667.10 p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the TURP group was longer at 1.38 versus 0.125 days for the PAE group. Total in-hospital costs for the TURP group ($5338.31, SD $3521.17) were significantly higher than for PAE ($1678.14, SD $442.0, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to TURP, PAE was associated with significantly lower direct in-hospital costs and shorter hospital stay.

Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comparative Analysis.

PURPOSE: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe and efficacious procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), though is technically challenging. We present our experience of technical and clinical outcomes of robotic and manual PAE in patients with BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective study of 40 consecutive patients 49-81 years old with moderate or severe grade BPH from May 2014 to July 2015: 20 robotic-assisted PAE (group 1), 20 manual PAE (group 2). Robotic-assisted PAE was performed using the Magellan Robotic System. American Urological Association (AUA-SI) score, cost, technical and clinical success, radiation dose, fluoroscopy, and procedure time were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed within and between each group using paired t test and one-way analysis of variance respectively, at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: No significant baseline differences in age and AUA-SI between groups. Technical success was 100% (group 1) and 95% (group 2). One unsuccessful subject from group 2 returned for a successful embolization using robotic assistance. Fluoroscopy and procedural times were similar between groups, with a non-significant lower patient radiation dose in group 1 (30,632.8 mGy/cm2 vs 35,890.9, p = 0.269). Disposable cost was significantly different between groups with the robotic-assisted PAE incurring a higher cost (group 1 $4530.2; group 2 $1588.5, p < 0.0001). Clinical improvement was significant in both arms at 3 months: group 1 mean change in AUA-SI of 8.3 (p = 0.006), group 2: 9.6 (p < 0.0001). No minor or major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted PAE offers technical success comparable to manual PAE, with similar clinical improvement with an increased cost.

Comparative Analysis of Prostate Volume as a Predictor of Outcome in Prostate Artery Embolization.

PURPOSE: To determine the role of prostate volume as a predictor of outcome after prostatic artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to September 2014, 78 consecutive patients undergoing PAE were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. Analysis was performed comparing prostate volume groups (group 1, < 50 cm3; group 2, 50-80 cm(3); group 3, > 80 cm3) at baseline and follow-up to assess for differences in outcomes of American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS: Mean baseline prostate volumes were 37.5 cm(3) in group 1 (n = 16), 65.7 cm3 in group 2 (n = 26), and 139.4 cm3 in group 3 (n = 36). There were no significant differences in baseline age, AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Bilateral embolization was successful in 75 of 78 patients (96%). Two patients underwent unilateral embolization, and treatment failed in one patient as a result of bilateral atherosclerotic occlusion. A significant reduction in AUA symptom index was achieved within groups from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months (n = 77): in group 1, from 27.2 to 14.0, 12.9, and 15.9, respectively (P = .002); in group 2, from 25.6 to 17.1, 16.3, and 13.5, respectively (P < .0001); and in group 3, from 26.5 to 15.2, 12.5, and 13.6, respectively (P < .0001). There was also a significant improvement in QOL. Comparative analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Two minor complications occurred: groin hematoma and a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: PAE offers similar clinical benefits to patients with differing gland sizes and may offer a reasonable alternative for poor candidates for urologic surgery.