Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comparative Analysis.

PURPOSE: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe and efficacious procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), though is technically challenging. We present our experience of technical and clinical outcomes of robotic and manual PAE in patients with BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective study of 40 consecutive patients 49-81 years old with moderate or severe grade BPH from May 2014 to July 2015: 20 robotic-assisted PAE (group 1), 20 manual PAE (group 2). Robotic-assisted PAE was performed using the Magellan Robotic System. American Urological Association (AUA-SI) score, cost, technical and clinical success, radiation dose, fluoroscopy, and procedure time were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed within and between each group using paired t test and one-way analysis of variance respectively, at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: No significant baseline differences in age and AUA-SI between groups. Technical success was 100% (group 1) and 95% (group 2). One unsuccessful subject from group 2 returned for a successful embolization using robotic assistance. Fluoroscopy and procedural times were similar between groups, with a non-significant lower patient radiation dose in group 1 (30,632.8 mGy/cm2 vs 35,890.9, p = 0.269). Disposable cost was significantly different between groups with the robotic-assisted PAE incurring a higher cost (group 1 $4530.2; group 2 $1588.5, p < 0.0001). Clinical improvement was significant in both arms at 3 months: group 1 mean change in AUA-SI of 8.3 (p = 0.006), group 2: 9.6 (p < 0.0001). No minor or major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted PAE offers technical success comparable to manual PAE, with similar clinical improvement with an increased cost.

Comparative Analysis of Prostate Volume as a Predictor of Outcome in Prostate Artery Embolization.

PURPOSE: To determine the role of prostate volume as a predictor of outcome after prostatic artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to September 2014, 78 consecutive patients undergoing PAE were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. Analysis was performed comparing prostate volume groups (group 1, < 50 cm3; group 2, 50-80 cm(3); group 3, > 80 cm3) at baseline and follow-up to assess for differences in outcomes of American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS: Mean baseline prostate volumes were 37.5 cm(3) in group 1 (n = 16), 65.7 cm3 in group 2 (n = 26), and 139.4 cm3 in group 3 (n = 36). There were no significant differences in baseline age, AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Bilateral embolization was successful in 75 of 78 patients (96%). Two patients underwent unilateral embolization, and treatment failed in one patient as a result of bilateral atherosclerotic occlusion. A significant reduction in AUA symptom index was achieved within groups from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months (n = 77): in group 1, from 27.2 to 14.0, 12.9, and 15.9, respectively (P = .002); in group 2, from 25.6 to 17.1, 16.3, and 13.5, respectively (P < .0001); and in group 3, from 26.5 to 15.2, 12.5, and 13.6, respectively (P < .0001). There was also a significant improvement in QOL. Comparative analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Two minor complications occurred: groin hematoma and a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: PAE offers similar clinical benefits to patients with differing gland sizes and may offer a reasonable alternative for poor candidates for urologic surgery.