Heterosexual couples' initial role and outcome expectations as predictors of the therapeutic alliance and relationship satisfaction prior to the fourth session.

We sampled routinely collected measures of role and outcome expectations, the expanded therapeutic alliance, and relationship satisfaction completed by 253 heterosexual couples seen by 35 therapists in the Marriage and Family Research Practice Network (Johnson et al., 2017) and investigated these variables as interdependent dyadic processes using the latent congruence model (Cheung, 2009) and the mediated actor-partner interdependence model (Ledermann et al., 2011). Taken together, we found a direct association between a couple's mean role and outcome expectation scores at Session 1 and individual partners' alliance perceptions at Session 3. Further, men rated the alliance more favorably when their outcome expectations were higher and the partners' outcome expectations were less discrepant. In terms of role expectations, both men and women began therapy expecting to be more actively engaged in the process than their partner. Whereas women rated the alliance more favorably when they had high role expectations for their partner as well as themselves, men rated the alliance more favorably when they had high expectations for their female partner's engagement in the therapy. Notably, alliance at Session 3 did not mediate the association between initial expectations and Session 4 relationship satisfaction due to a strong association (r = 0.85) between relationship satisfaction rated prior to Sessions 1 and 4. In other words, although the best predictor of relationship status before the fourth session was how the relationship was perceived before couple therapy began, men's and women's initial role and outcome expectations were important contributors to the early alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Psychotherapist perceptions of engagement-building behaviours with youth clients across developmental levels.

Building a positive therapeutic relationship is a challenging, yet critical, first step in conducting youth psychotherapy. A number of studies in the youth treatment literature have indicated that a positive therapeutic alliance is related to increased treatment attendance, participation, and outcome. Some research has examined therapist behaviours for engaging therapy clients; however, developmental differences in alliance formation have had limited exploration. The current study surveyed clinicians about their use of specific engagement strategies and the developmental stage of their youth clients. It was hypothesised that participants would differentially rate the importance of different aspects of therapeutic engagement based upon a youth client's developmental stage and that these would correspond with differences in specific engagement strategies. A total of 64 clinicians with experience treating youth completed the study. The participants completed a questionnaire administered online that asked them to rate the importance of developmental differences to forming a therapeutic relationship and provide example client behaviours from their clinical experience for each developmental stage. Results showed clinicians felt the relative importance of collaboration, advocacy, and trustworthiness increased with age. These differences were also evidenced in the specific strategies clinicians endorsed in relation to each engagement factor across developmental stages. This program of research will eventually aid in the development of new guidelines for engaging clients in youth psychotherapy. In addition, the results may be used to enhance psychotherapy training for those working with children and adolescents.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician behaviors and characteristics related to alliance building with youth clients.

The literature on developing alliance with youth clients has severely lagged behind that of adults. To date, there has been no meta-analytic review and limited qualitative synthesis of clinician variables which may contribute to the alliance with youth clients. Systematic literature search found a total of 49 relevant citations. Of the identified articles, 13 (27.08%) reported quantitative methods. Results of the qualitative review suggested that the majority of this research has focused on developing an emotional bond and a sense of collaboration. Meta-analysis found significant relations between alliance building and reducing variables and alliance (ralliance building = 0.17; ralliance reducing = -0.24). This analysis revealed specific behaviors particularly facilitative to youth alliance development, including collaborating with the client, finding common ground, exploring subjective experiences, orienting to treatment, providing praise, and enhancing facilitative conditions. In contrast, clinician lapse and pushing the client to talk were most predictive of a worse alliance. These results indicate certain behaviors which may be particularly important for clinicians to facilitate and not impair youth alliance formation. There is a need for greater youth alliance formation research to better determine how alliance formation may differ across stages of development and treatment modalities.

Evaluating Dialectical Behavior Therapy Training With Mental Health Clinicians.

A substantial body of research supports dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) as an evidence-based treatment for those with borderline personality disorder (BPD); however, there remains a lack of mental health clinicians trained in this modality, resulting in limited clinician competencies and skills. Furthermore, the effectiveness of DBT trainings with mental health clinicians remains understudied. The present study evaluated a comprehensive 5-day DBT-Linehan Board of Certification training program. Informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study assessed changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control (PBC), intentions, and behaviors relevant to DBT at baseline, posttraining, and 6-month follow-up. Results showed large, significant pre-to-post training improvements in clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, PBC, and intentions related to DBT implementation. Large improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and PBC were sustained at follow-up. A significant improvement in actual behaviors was also found at follow-up. Implications of the present study and directions for future research are discussed.

Family therapy for maltreated youth: Can a strengthening therapeutic alliance empower change?

We tested the process of change in Alliance Empowerment Family Therapy (AEFT; Escudero, 2013), a systemic, team-based approach for treating child welfare involved families. Since building and balancing strong personal and within-family therapeutic alliances are crucial for motivating and sustaining change in these multistressed, overburdened families, we assessed alliance perceptions over time in relation to two indices of therapy outcome, youth functioning, and family-specific goal attainment. Specifically, we administered the self-report version of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (Friedlander et al., 2006) following Sessions 3, 6, and 9 to 156 Spanish families seen by 20 therapists in six agencies whose mission is to serve child welfare referred maltreated youth. Results showed that AEFT delivered in M = 11.04 sessions (SD = 3.29) was effective in attaining family-specific goals and improving child functioning, d = 1.16, as rated by the therapist team in coordination with the referring caseworker. A unique aspect of the study was the modeling, at each time point, of the shared therapeutic system alliance, a latent variable consisting of the therapist's rating of the alliance as well as the alliance ratings of the youth and primary caregiver. As we hypothesized, shared alliance perceptions strengthened with time and positively predicted posttreatment outcomes. Moreover, a comparison of linear growth models with and without the therapist's perspective showed that inclusion of the therapist ratings in the shared alliance variables improved the predictability of child and family outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Illustrating systemic change in family therapy: How therapists' and clients' alliance perceptions codevelop over time.

Research showing that caregivers', adolescents' and therapists' perceptions of the therapeutic alliance become more similar over time has not examined conceptual models, like emotional contagion and interdependence, that are theorized to account for this convergence. Objective: We modeled codevelopment in systemic family therapy to examine mutual influence and shared environment processes among the alliance perceptions of youth, caregivers, and therapists. Method: The self-report version of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s) was administered after sessions 3, 6 and 9-156 Spanish maltreating families and 20 therapists. Results: Using a triadic version of the repeated measures actor-partner interdependence analysis, a random intercepts cross-lagged panel model, we found significant effects of the shared environment and mutual influence in caregivers' and therapists' alliance scores over time, reflecting emotional contagion. Additionally, (i) therapists' alliance scores at session 6 significantly predicted youth alliance scores at session 9, and (ii) therapist alliance at session 6 significantly mediated the relationship between caregiver alliance at session 3 and youth alliance at session 9, suggesting that therapists bridge the caregiver's and youth's perceptions of the alliance. In successful (compared to unsuccessful) cases, therapists' alliance perceptions at session 6 positively influenced caregivers' alliance perceptions at session 9. Conclusion: Therapist's perceptions of the alliance can bridge differences in alliance perceptions of caregivers and adolescents resulting in greater similarity in alliance perceptions over time.

Mapping the progress of the process: Codevelopment of the therapeutic alliance with maltreated adolescents.

We used a longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model to examine the codeveloping alliance in alliance empowerment therapy (AET; Escudero, 2013), a manualized team-based approach developed in Spain specifically for child welfare-involved youth. In this first evaluation of AET, we sampled 102 adolescents, 83% of whom had been removed from their homes due to abuse or neglect, and 40% of whom were in crisis at the time of referral. Before each session, clients rated their improvement-so-far; after each session, both clients and therapists completed a brief alliance measure, an adaptation of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s; Friedlander et al., 2006) for individual therapy. In terms of outcome, clients' improvement ratings were significantly associated with posttreatment changes in overall functioning and personal goal attainment. With respect to the change process, growth was observed in both clients' and therapists' ratings of the alliance over 12 sessions, and an increased similarity in alliance ratings was due to more rapid growth in the therapists' ratings than the clients' ratings. Dynamic structural equation modeling indicated that at higher levels of adolescent goal attainment, a stronger association was observed between increased therapist-rated alliance and goal attainment. In other words, in the most effective cases, therapists were more responsive to how the adolescents seemed to have experienced the alliance in the previous session. The cocreated alliance perceptions were due to therapist (rather than client) responsiveness, as well as to unspecified aspects of sharing a therapy environment over time, such as familiarity with the process, regular meetings, and so on. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Couple and family therapists' experiences with Telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a phenomenological analysis.

In designing this study, we aimed to obtain a rich, phenomenological understanding of the experiences of couple and family therapists who transitioned their practice to telehealth due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Twelve experienced therapists from the U.S., Spain and Australia were interviewed in depth about their experiences of this transition, particularly how they developed and maintained therapeutic alliances in a virtual context with couples and families suffering pandemic-related hardships. The qualitative analysis identified 40 themes reflecting participants' initial impressions of telehealth and their positive and negative reactions and adjustments to practicing remotely. Upon overcoming some initial wariness about providing services virtually, many participants described advantages to this way of working with families. Indeed, participants were creative in adjusting to this novel therapy modality, finding new ways to connect emotionally with their clients, to work meaningfully with children, to assess in-session dynamics, and to ensure their clients' privacy and safety. Notably, several participants commented on the relatively slower development of alliances with new cases and the challenge of repairing split alliances between family members. Many of these difficulties were described as due to having minimal access to their clients' raw emotions and the inability to use typical systemic interventions, such as moving family members around physically. Participants also reflected on being a "participant observer" to the upheaval caused by the pandemic, a distressing experience they shared with the families in their care.

Toward a broader understanding of split alliances in family therapy: Adding the therapist to the mix.

To broaden our understanding of a split alliance in family therapy, we investigated the frequencies and correlates of sessions in which therapists, youth, and caregivers reported markedly different perceptions of the alliance. The sample consisted of 156 Spanish families who received Alliance Empowerment Family Therapy (Escudero, Adolescentes y familias en conflicto, 2013) for child maltreatment. Family members and therapists rated the alliance on the SOFTA-s (Friedlander et al., Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53, 214) after sessions 3, 6, and 9; family members rated their perceptions of treatment progress before sessions 4, 7, and 10. A cluster analysis differentiated sessions with a split adult-youth alliance (27.7%) from a split family-therapist alliance (44.1%), and a balanced alliance (similar ratings across the three perspectives; 28.2%). Client-rated treatment progress was differentially associated with the type of alliance split and the average alliance rating, whereas better posttreatment outcomes (child functioning and family goal attainment) were associated with fewer sessions having either type of split alliance.

Con el fin de ampliar nuestros conocimientos de una alianza dividida en la terapia familiar, investigamos las frecuencias y las correlaciones de las sesiones en las cuales los terapeutas, los jóvenes y los cuidadores informaron percepciones marcadamente diferentes de la alianza. La muestra estuvo formada por 156 familias españolas que recibieron terapia familiar de empoderamiento y alianza (Escudero, 2013) para el maltrato infantil. Los miembros de la familia y los terapeutas calificaron la alianza en el SOATIF-s (Friedlander et al., 2006) después de las sesiones 3, 6 y 9; los familiares calificaron sus percepciones del avance del tratamiento antes de las sesiones 4, 7 y 10. Un análisis de agrupamiento diferenció las sesiones con una alianza dividida entre los adultos y los jóvenes (27.7 %) de una alianza dividida entre la familia y el terapeuta (44.1 %) y una alianza equilibrada (calificaciones similares entre las tres perspectivas; 28.2 %). El avance del tratamiento calificado por el paciente estuvo asociado diferencialmente con el tipo de alianza dividida y la calificación promedio de la alianza, mientras que los mejores resultados posteriores al tratamiento (el funcionamiento del niño y el logro de objetivos familiares) estuvieron asociados con menos sesiones que tenían cualquiera de los tipos de alianza dividida.