Qualitative analysis of the margins of restorations made with different filling resins.

PURPOSE: In this study the comparative results obtained from examinations of two different restorative composites with different cavities filling method are presented. Micro-CT was used for the evaluation of the marginal integrity and quality of composite fillings in connection with microstructural investigations made by both optical and scanning electron microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The examinations of dental tooth filings in bulk-fill technique were based on micro-CT and microscopy observations. Two different restorative composites were selected for the study, namely SonicFill- bulk fill and conventional Filtek Z550. RESULTS: The experiment has shown that micro-CT screening analysis for identification of individual components of tooth and fillings systems gives a high quality of images. Thanks to that it was possible to analyze and identify the porosity in the fillings. But the microscopy analysis has shown more information about the internal structure and quality of bonding between composite and enamel/dentin. The SonicFill gives better quality and bonding to structure of teeth than Filtek. CONCLUSIONS: SonicFill's filling have more homogenous structure than Filtec. It has a greater share of reinforcement in the form of polygonal particles, in Filtek particles have a shape close to spherical. Sonic Fill gives a better adhesion to tooth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The evaluation of clinical relevance in this research is crucial to simplify the transfer of knowledge from research by materials engineering into practice in dentistry.

Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare under in vitro conditions marginal sealing of 4 different bulk-fill materials composite restorations of class II. METHODS: Comparative evaluation concerned 4 composites of a bulk-fill type: SonicFill, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Filtek Bulk Fill, and SDR. The study used 30 third molars without caries. In each tooth 4 cavities of class II were prepared. The prepared tooth samples were placed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h, and after that in each restoration the depth of dye penetration along the side walls was evaluated. RESULTS: The highest rating (score 0, no dye penetration) was achieved by 93.33% of the restorations made of the SDR material, 90% of restorations of SonicFill system, 86.66% of restorations of the composite Filtek Bulk Fill, and 73.33% of restorations of the Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill. CONCLUSION: The performed study showed that bulk-fill flowable or sonic-activated flowable composite restorations have better marginal sealing (lack of discoloration) in comparison with bulk-fill paste-like composite.