Relapse and Treatment Adherence in Patients with Schizophrenia Switching from Paliperidone Palmitate Once-Monthly to Three-Monthly Formulation: A Retrospective Health Claims Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: Relapse and treatment adherence to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) and three-monthly (PP3M) formulations in patients with schizophrenia were evaluated and compared using health claims data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data (June 2015─June 2018) obtained from the MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid Database were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 claim for schizophrenia diagnosis prior to and/or at index date (i.e., date of first PP3M prescription record for PP3M patients and same month/year as the matched PP3M patients for PP1M patients) and continuous enrollment in the insurance plan for ≥12 months prior to index date (baseline) were included. PP1M cohort included patients who received ≥4 PP1M doses. PP3M patients were matched with PP1M patients (1:3) using propensity score matching and prevalent new user design. Outcome measures were relapse rate, time to relapse, proportion of days covered (PDC), and level of treatment adherence defined by PDC in five levels. Time to relapse was compared by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test with the hazard ratio calculated using Cox proportion hazards model; PDC by t-test, and relapse rate and PDC categories by chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 1564 patients (428 PP3M and 1136 PP1M) were included. Relapse rate was lower in PP3M cohort (10.5%) compared with PP1M cohort (15.7%). Incidence rate of relapse was 8.98/100 person-years (PY) in PP3M cohort and 13.81/100 PY in PP1M cohort. After a mean (SD) follow-up of 456.1 (240.28) days in PP3M cohort and 465.4 (237.95) days in PP1M cohort, PP3M patients had a significantly lower relapse risk (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.90) than PP1M patients. Treatment adherence was significantly (p<0.0001) higher in PP3M versus PP1M cohort. CONCLUSION: Risk of relapse was significantly lower, and treatment adherence was significantly higher in PP3M cohort compared with PP1M cohort. Higher treatment adherence was associated with lower relapse rate.

Development and preliminary validation of an integrated efficacy-tolerability composite measure for the evaluation of analgesics.

The goal of this analysis was to develop and evaluate integrated measures of benefit and tolerability of analgesic drugs in clinical trials. We evaluated an efficacy-tolerability composite (ETC) measure combining different cutoff values for daily pain reduction (≥20%, ≥30%, or ≥50% pain reduction) and adverse events (AEs) (no AE, no or mild AEs, no or mild drug-related AEs). Nine ETC cutoff values (3 × 3) were tested using data from a randomized double-blind trial comparing tapentadol extended release (ER) (n = 310), oxycodone controlled release (CR) (n = 322), and placebo (n = 314) in subjects with chronic low back pain. Efficacy-tolerability composite scores were calculated as the mean number of days a subject met the ETC criterion divided by the number of days the subject was expected to be in study; ETC scores were then averaged in each treatment group. For all 9 ETC measures, validity was demonstrated by significant correlation of ETC scores with patients' Global Impression of change and with change from baseline in pain scores. Tapentadol ER ETC scores were statistically significantly higher than oxycodone CR ETC scores for 4 of the ETC measures. "No/mild drug-related AE and ≥20% pain reduction" demonstrated the best overall validity (correlation with patients' global impression of change) and responsiveness (discrimination between treatment groups), yielding a higher standardized effect size for tapentadol ER compared with placebo (0.19 [95% confidence interval: 0.031-0.346]) and with oxycodone CR (0.23 [95% confidence interval: 0.070-0.383]) than other cutoff values. Thus, we have identified herein a composite measure that seems to be a valid and responsive measure of the overall efficacy and tolerability of analgesics in clinical trials.

Long-term safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an open-label, dose-titration, 1-year study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety of OROS methylphenidate in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, dose-titration, flexible dose study enrolled adults with ADHD for 6 or 12 months of treatment with OROS methylphenidate. Dosing began at 36 mg/d, with titration in 18-mg increments every 7 days until a predefined outcome (efficacy threshold, maximum dosage of 108 mg/d, or limiting adverse event). Dose reduction occurred for prespecified reasons, and the subjects discontinued if unable to tolerate 36 mg/d. Assessments included ADHD symptoms, adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory results. RESULTS: A total of 550 subjects received treatment (52% were men; mean age, 39 years; range, 18-65 years), and 57% (146/258) and 44% (129/292) completed their 6 or 12 months of treatment with mean durations of 128 and 213 days, respectively. The final prescribed dosages were 36 mg/d (22.4%), 54 mg/d (25.1%), 72 mg/d (22.0%), 90 mg/d (17.1%), and 108 mg/d (13.5%). Modest increases from baseline to final visit were observed in mean systolic (2.6 mm Hg) and diastolic (1.9 mm Hg) blood pressure and pulse (4.1 beats per minute). The mean weight decreased by 2.3 kg. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values or electrocardiogram parameters were observed other than increased heart rate. Most common adverse events included decreased appetite (26.7%), headache (24.0%), and insomnia (20.7%). No serious adverse event was considered related to study medication. Several measures of efficacy indicated improvement during the study. CONCLUSIONS: OROS methylphenidate, in the flexible dosage range from 36 to 108 mg/d, was well tolerated for up to 1 year in adults with ADHD.

Efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate (Concerta; McNeil Pediatrics Division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Titusville, NJ) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. METHODS: A randomized, 7-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, parallel-group study of OROS methylphenidate 36, 54, 72, 90, or 108 mg/d versus placebo was conducted in adults with ADHD. The primary end point was the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale. Other assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, a post hoc responder analysis, adverse events, and vital signs. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six subjects (56.2% male; mean age, 39.0 years; range, 18-65 years) were included in the intention-to-treat population (110 subjects on OROS methylphenidate; 116 subjects on placebo). OROS methylphenidate resulted in greater ADHD symptom improvement than placebo as demonstrated by a statistically significantly lower least squares mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale total score at the final visit (last observation carried forward [LOCF]; P = 0.012). Subjects on OROS methylphenidate also had a significantly lower least squares mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score at the final visit (LOCF; P = 0.008). A significantly greater proportion of subjects on OROS methylphenidate (36.9%, 38/103 subjects) were responders at the final visit (LOCF) compared with placebo (20.9%, 24/115 subjects; P = 0.009). OROS methylphenidate was well tolerated. Adverse events were reported by 93 (84.5%) of the 110 OROS methylphenidate-treated subjects versus 74 (63.8%) of the 116 placebo-treated subjects. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events and no deaths were reported. Similar mean changes from baseline to final visit (LOCF) for systolic and diastolic blood pressures for the OROS methylphenidate and placebo groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a dose escalation ranging from 36 to 108 mg/d, OROS methylphenidate is effective and well tolerated in the management of ADHD in adults.

Efficacy and safety of extended-release oxybutynin in combination with tamsulosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release oxybutynin in combination with the alpha1-blocker tamsulosin in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind trial performed between March 29, 2004, and June 22, 2005, 420 men aged 45 years or older with a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 13 or more and IPSS for storage of 8 or more were randomized to receive tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d) with either extended-release oxybutynin (10 mg/d) or placebo for 12 weeks. Eligibility requirements included a maximum flow rate of 8 mL/s or more with voided volume of 125 mL or more and a postvoid residual volume of 150 mL or less on 2 occasions. Postvoid residual volume and peak flow rates at weeks 4, 8, and 12 were measured. The primary end point was change from baseline in total IPSS after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included change in IPSSs for storage and quality of life. RESULTS: Tamsulosin combined with extended-release oxybutynin resulted in significantly greater improvement in total IPSS compared with tamsulosin and placebo after 8 (P=.03) and 12 (P=.006) weeks of treatment, and improved IPSS for storage and quality of life at all assessment points (P<.01). The incidence of postvoid residual volume higher than 300 mL was 2.9% (6/209) in patients receiving combination therapy compared with 0.5% (1/209) in patients receiving tamsulosin alone (P=.12). Occurrence of peak flow rates below 5 mL/s was 3.8% (8/209) for combination therapy and 5.7% (12/209) for tamsulosin alone (P=.49). CONCLUSION: In men with substantial storage symptoms, combination therapy with tamsulosin and extended-release oxybutynin demonstrated greater efficacy than and comparable safety and tolerability to tamsulosin monotherapy.