ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alcohol misuse is overlooked frequently in hospitalized patients, but is common among patients with pneumonia and acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Investigations in hospitalized patients rely heavily on self-report surveys or chart abstraction, which lack sensitivity. Therefore, our understanding of the prevalence of alcohol misuse before and during the COVID-19 pandemic is limited. RESEARCH QUESTION: In critically ill patients with respiratory failure, did the proportion of patients with alcohol misuse, defined by the direct biomarker phosphatidylethanol, vary over a period including the COVID-19 pandemic? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled prospectively from 2015 through 2019 (before the pandemic) and from 2020 through 2022 (during the pandemic). Alcohol use data, including Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)-C scores, were collected from electronic health records, and phosphatidylethanol presence was assessed at ICU admission. The relationship between clinical variables and phosphatidylethanol values was examined using multivariable ordinal regression. Dichotomized phosphatidylethanol values (≥ 25 ng/mL) defining alcohol misuse were compared with AUDIT-C scores signifying misuse before and during the pandemic, and correlations between log-transformed phosphatidylethanol levels and AUDIT-C scores were evaluated and compared by era. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing phosphatidylethanol data. RESULTS: Compared with patients enrolled before the pandemic (n = 144), patients in the pandemic cohort (n = 92) included a substantially higher proportion with phosphatidylethanol-defined alcohol misuse (38% vs 90%; P < .001). In adjusted models, absence of diabetes, positive results for COVID-19, and enrollment during the pandemic each were associated with higher phosphatidylethanol values. The correlation between health care worker-recorded AUDIT-C score and phosphatidylethanol level was significantly lower during the pandemic. INTERPRETATION: The higher prevalence of phosphatidylethanol-defined alcohol misuse during the pandemic suggests that alcohol consumption increased during this period, identifying alcohol misuse as a potential risk factor for severe COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. Results also suggest that AUDIT-C score may be less useful in characterizing alcohol consumption during high clinical capacity.
ABSTRACT
Background: The evaluation of volume status is essential to clinical decision-making, yet multiple studies have shown that physical exam does not reliably estimate a patient's intravascular volume. Venous excess ultrasound score (VExUS) is an emerging volume assessment tool that utilizes inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and pulse-wave Doppler waveforms of the portal, hepatic and renal veins to evaluate venous congestion. A point-of-care ultrasound exam initially developed by Beaubein-Souligny et al., VExUS represents a reproducible, non-invasive and accurate means of assessing intravascular congestion. VExUS has recently been validated against RHC-the gold-standard of hemodynamic evaluation for volume assessment. While VExUS scores were shown to correlate with elevated cardiac filling pressures (i.e., right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)) at a static point in time, the ability of VExUS to capture dynamic changes in volume status has yet to be elucidated. We hypothesized that paired VExUS examinations performed before and after hemodialysis (HD) would reflect changes in venous congestion in a diverse patient population. Methods: Inpatients with end-stage renal disease undergoing intermittent HD were evaluated with transabdominal VExUS and lung ultrasonography before and following HD. Paired t-tests were conducted to assess differences between pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores, B-line scores and dyspnea scores. Results: Fifty-six patients were screened for inclusion in this study. Ten were excluded due to insufficient image quality or incomplete exams, and forty-six patients (ninety-two paired ultrasound exams) were included in the final analysis. Paired t-test analysis of pre-HD and post-HD VExUS scores revealed a mean VExUS grade change of 0.82 (p<0.001) on a VExUS scale ranging from 0 to 4. The mean difference in B-line score following HD was 0.8 (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in subjective dyspnea score (p=0.41). Conclusions: Large-volume fluid removal with HD was represented by changes in VExUS score, highlighting the utility of the VExUS exam to capture dynamic shifts in intravascular volume status. Future studies should evaluate change in VExUS grade with intravenous fluid or diuretic administration, with the ultimate goal of evaluating the capacity of a standardized bedside ultrasound protocol to guide inpatient volume optimization.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2020, the New Mexico Governor declared a public health emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The New Mexico medical advisory team contacted University of New Mexico (UNM) faculty to form a team to consolidate growing information on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its disease to facilitate New Mexico's pandemic management. Thus, faculty, physicians, staff, graduate students, and medical students created the "UNM Global Health COVID-19 Intelligence Briefing." OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we sought to (1) share how to create an informative briefing to guide public policy and medical practice and manage information overload with rapidly evolving scientific evidence; (2) determine the qualitative usefulness of the briefing to its readers; and (3) determine the qualitative effect this project has had on virtual medical education. METHODS: Microsoft Teams was used for manual and automated capture of COVID-19 articles and composition of briefings. Multilevel triaging saved impactful articles to be reviewed, and priority was placed on randomized controlled studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and information on health care and policy response to COVID-19. The finalized briefing was disseminated by email, a listserv, and posted on the UNM digital repository. A survey was sent to readers to determine briefing usefulness and whether it led to policy or medical practice changes. Medical students, unable to partake in direct patient care, proposed to the School of Medicine that involvement in the briefing should count as course credit, which was approved. The maintenance of medical student involvement in the briefings as well as this publication was led by medical students. RESULTS: An average of 456 articles were assessed daily. The briefings reached approximately 1000 people by email and listserv directly, with an unknown amount of forwarding. Digital repository tracking showed 5047 downloads across 116 countries as of July 5, 2020. The survey found 108 (95%) of 114 participants gained relevant knowledge, 90 (79%) believed it decreased misinformation, 27 (24%) used the briefing as their primary source of information, and 90 (79%) forwarded it to colleagues. Specific and impactful public policy decisions were informed based on the briefing. Medical students reported that the project allowed them to improve on their scientific literature assessment, stay current on the pandemic, and serve their community. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 briefings succeeded in informing and guiding New Mexico policy and clinical practice. The project received positive feedback from the community and was shown to decrease information burden and misinformation. The virtual platforms allowed for the continuation of medical education. Variability in subject matter expertise was addressed with training, standardized article selection criteria, and collaborative editing led by faculty.
