ABSTRACT
Recent studies on diverse taxa suggest that natural selection caused by shifts in ecology or invasions of novel habitats plays an important role in adaptive divergence and speciation. Exciting new studies integrating approaches from both the field and the laboratory suggest that ecological shifts can result in extremely rapid rates of evolutionary divergence. Although experimental approaches that link rapid ecological divergence to reproductive isolation and speciation are in their infancy, recent research indicates those approaches that will be most useful.
ABSTRACT
Control rats rapidly learned to avoid drinking either a sucrose solution (Experiment 1) or a NaCl solution (Experiment 2) when the taste was paired with illness. These rats also produced aversive reactivity to each of these solutions in a taste reactivity test. Rats that lacked gustatory cortex (GC) learned to avoid drinking sucrose and NaCl, albeit at a slower rate than control rats. GC rats failed to display aversive reactivity to these tastes. The GC rats did show normal aversive reactivity to a strong quinine HCl solution during additional tests. It is suggested that the avoidance developed by GC rats did not entail a palatability shift of the conditional stimulus as it did in control rats. This altered learning strategy may account for the consistent learning deficits found in GC rats trained to avoid tastes.
Subject(s)
Association Learning/physiology , Avoidance Learning/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Conditioning, Classical/physiology , Taste/physiology , Animals , Brain Mapping , Chlorides/toxicity , Drinking/physiology , Habituation, Psychophysiologic/physiology , Lithium/toxicity , Lithium Chloride , Male , Mental Recall/physiology , RatsABSTRACT
The orofacial responses of rats following infusion of taste solutions were examined in two experiments. In the first experiment, naive rats were presented with a 6% alcohol solution and three sucrose mixtures (sucrose combined with quinine hydrochloride, hydrochloric acid, and sodium chloride, respectively) on separate trials and the resulting taste reactivity was examined. The only difference among the solutions was that alcohol elicited a significantly larger number of aversive responses (e.g., gapes, passive drips) than the sucrose mixtures. In the second experiment, naive rats were trained to avoid 6% alcohol using standard conditioned aversion procedures; rats were then tested for reactivity to the three sucrose mixtures and the alcohol solution. With the alcohol solution, trained rats displayed significantly fewer ingestive responses and significantly more aversive responses than control rats. The response of trained rats to the sucrose + quinine solution was similar to that of alcohol: fewer ingestive responses and more aversive responses than control rats. The number of aversive responses to the alcohol and the sucrose + quinine mixture by the trained rats did not differ significantly. Reactivity to the sucrose + hydrochloric acid and sucrose + sodium chloride solutions did not differ between trained rats and control rats. The results suggest that a sucrose + quinine solution has a perceived taste (as revealed by elicited orofacial reflexes) similar to alcohol and that the sucrose mixture is avoided by rats with alcohol aversions because it is unpalatable.
