ABSTRACT
METHODS: The authors studied vaginal delivery with and without episiotomy, during the period 1993-1994. The aim of this study was to examine 100 puerperal women and a group of gynecologists and midwives, to evaluate the benefits and risks of routinely used medical procedures, and to understand the rational of the procedure and put in evidence the indications on which decisions were based. RESULTS: This study does not indicate that episiotomy offers a clear benefit to primipara in terms of decreased numbers of risk factors, while it is indicated in laborious vaginal delivery. The opinion of sanitary operators about this procedure is favourable especially for primiparas, but however this does not necessarily mean that more routine episiotomy can be justified.
Subject(s)
Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data , Gynecology , Nurse Midwives , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Postpartum Period , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Nurse Midwives/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , WorkforceABSTRACT
The authors studied about planned abortion performed by girls under 19 years of age, during the period 1991-1994. The aim of this study was to evaluate the entity of planned abortion also concerning the number of adolescent pregnancy. Our study show the percentage of pregnancy was progressively diminished, while regarding the planned abortion even if reduced along the time, the percentage remain steady in the course of years examined.