Risk Factors Associated with the Development of Hospital-Acquired Infections in Hospitalized Patients with Severe COVID-19.

Recognition of risk factors for hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in patients with COVID-19 is warranted. We aimed to describe factors associated with the development of HAI in patients with severe COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all adult patients admitted with severe COVID-19 between March 2020 and November 2020. The primary outcome was HAI development. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression models were constructed. Among 1540 patients, HAI occurred in 221 (14%). A total of 299 episodes of HAI were registered. The most common HAI were hospital-acquired/ventilation-associated pneumonia (173 episodes) and primary bloodstream infection (66 episodes). Death occurred in 387 (35%) patients and was more frequent in patients with HAI (38% vs. 23%, p < 0.01). Early mechanical ventilation (aOR 18.78, 95% CI 12.56-28.07), chronic kidney disease (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 1.4-8.27), use of corticosteroids (aOR 2.95, 95% CI 1.92-4.53) and tocilizumab (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 1.38-5.22), age ≥ 60 years (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.27-2.88), male sex (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.24), and obesity (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03-2.15) were associated with HAI. In patients with severe COVID-19, mechanical ventilation within the first 24 h upon admission, chronic kidney disease, use of corticosteroids, use of tocilizumab, age ≥ 60 years, male sex, and obesity were associated with a higher risk of HAI.

Trends of Mycobacterium bovis Isolation and First-Line Anti-tuberculosis Drug Susceptibility Profile: A Fifteen-Year Laboratory-Based Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes the majority of tuberculosis (TB) cases in humans; however, in developing countries, human TB caused by M. bovis may be frequent but undetected. Human TB caused by M. bovis is considered a zoonosis; transmission is mainly through consumption of unpasteurized dairy products, and it is less frequently attributed to animal-to-human or human-to-human contact. We describe the trends of M. bovis isolation from human samples and first-line drug susceptibility during a 15-year period in a referral laboratory located in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data on mycobacterial isolates from human clinical samples were retrieved from the laboratory's database for the 2000-2014 period. Susceptibility to first-line drugs: rifampin, isoniazid, streptomycin (STR) and ethambutol was determined. We identified 1,165 isolates, 73.7% were M. tuberculosis and 26.2%, M. bovis. Among pulmonary samples, 16.6% were M. bovis. The proportion of M. bovis isolates significantly increased from 7.8% in 2000 to 28.4% in 2014 (X(2)trend, p<0.001). Primary STR resistance was higher among M. bovis compared with M. tuberculosis isolates (10.9% vs.3.4%, p<0.001). Secondary multidrug resistance (MDR) rates were 38.5% and 34.4% for M. bovis and M. tuberculosis, respectively (p = 0.637). A rising trend of primary STR monoresistance was observed for both species (3.4% in 2000-2004 vs. 7.6% in 2010-2014; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There is a high prevalence and a rising trend of M. bovis isolates in our region. The proportion of pulmonary M. bovis isolates is higher than in previous reports. Additionally, we report high rates of primary anti-tuberculosis resistance and secondary MDR in both M. tuberculosis and M. bovis. This is one of the largest reports on drug susceptibility of M. bovis from human samples and shows a significant proportion of first-line anti-tuberculosis drug resistance.

[Efficacy and impact of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis]. / Eficacia e impacto de la prueba de la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en el diagnóstico de tuberculosis extrapulmonar.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of PCR in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and its impact in the management of patients in a tertiary-care center in Mexico City. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study based on 40 clinical charts of patients to whom nested PCR was performed for the diagnosis of TB from June 1999 to December 2000. We reviewed the medical notes of 10 days before and 10 days after the PCR study to analyze its impact in the management of the patient. Also, we reviewed the rest of the chart to decide if the patient suffered from TB or not (gold standard). The categories of diagnosis were definitive case of TB, probable TB and no TB. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. RESULTS: The PCR was positive in 45% of the cases. The sensitivity of PCR to diagnosis TB was 50%, specificity 59%, and the positive and negative predictive value were 35% and 72%, respectively. If just spinal fluid was included, the sensitivity and the negative predictive value increased to 75% and 63%, respectively. The PCR had an impact in the management of 13% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB has limited efficacy, which improves when the test is done in spinal fluid samples. The impact of the result of PCR in the clinical management of the patients was poor.