Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging alter the surgical plan in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury?

BACKGROUND: Whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adds value to surgical planning for patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (ATCSCI) remains controversial. In this study, we compared surgeons' operative planning decisions with and without preoperative MRI. We had two hypotheses: (1) the surgical plan for ATCSCI would not change substantially after the MRI and (2) intersurgeon agreement on the surgical plan would also not change substantially after the MRI. METHODS: We performed a vignette-based survey study that included a retrospective review of all adult trauma patients who presented to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center from 2010 to 2019 with signs of acute quadriplegia and underwent computed tomography (CT), MRI, and subsequent cervical spine surgery within 48 hours of admission. We abstracted patient demographics, admission physiology, and injury details. Patient clinical scenarios were presented to three spine surgeons, first with only the CT and then, a minimum of 2 weeks later, with both the CT and MRI. At each presentation, the surgeons identified their surgical plan, which included timing (none, <8, <24, >24 hours), approach (anterior, posterior, circumferential), and targeted vertebral levels. The outcomes were change in surgical plan and intersurgeon agreement. We used Fleiss' kappa (κ) to measure intersurgeon agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met the criteria and were included. Ninety-three percent of the surgical plans were changed after the MRI. Intersurgeon agreement was "slight" to "fair" both before the MRI (timing, κ = 0.22; approach, κ = 0.35; levels, κ = 0.13) and after the MRI (timing, κ = 0.06; approach, κ = 0.27; levels, κ = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Surgical plans for ATCSCI changed substantially when the MRI was presented in addition to the CT; however, intersurgeon agreement regarding the surgical plan was low and not improved by the addition of the MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level II.

Microsurgical Removal of Microcatheter in the Middle Cerebral Artery During Resection of an Arteriovenous Malformation Resection.

Surgical resection is the current standard of therapy for the treatment of arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Endovascular embolization is commonly used as an adjunct prior to surgical resection because it is believed to reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding. Embolization has been associated with other complications including visual deficits, vessel perforation, and catheter adhesion. Catheter adhesion in which retained segments are contained within the embolization cast are not necessarily cause for concern, but retention of larger portions may confer an increased risk of thrombus formation. Such cases warrant the removal of the retained segments or the patient may suffer serious complications including death related to cerebrovascular events. In this case report, we describe a unique case of catheter adhesion in which the extension of the feeding catheter and the length of the introducer was left in its entirety down to the entry portion at the level of the groin and later retrieved in its entirety by craniotomy.

Comparing Radiation Dose from Conventional Fluoroscopy to Intraoperative Cone Beam CT (O-arm) during Percutaneous Lesioning Procedures of the Gasserian Ganglion.

INTRODUCTION: The use of intraoperative CT-guidance during the percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia has become increasingly popular due to the greater ease of foramen ovale cannulation and decreased procedure times. Concerns regarding radiation dose to the patient, however, remain unaddressed. We sought to compare the emitted radiation dose from fluoroscopy with intraoperative CT for these procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of percutaneous lesioning procedures for trigeminal neuralgia performed between 2010 until 2012 at our institution was conducted and radiation doses to the patient were recorded. We subsequently simulated four separate percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomies using the O-arm intraoperative CT (Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to cannulate the foramen ovale bilaterally in two formalin-fixed cadaver heads. RESULTS: Seventeen successful percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia were performed during the study period. Eleven procedures containing complete records were included in the final analysis. For procedures using fluoroscopy, the mean dosage was 15.2 mGys (range: 1.15 - 47.95, 95% CI 7.34 - 22.99). Radiation dosage from the O-arm imaging system was 16.55 mGy for all four cases. An unequal variance t-test did not reach statistical significance (p=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a significant difference in radiation dose delivered to subjects when comparing CT-guided foramen ovale cannulation relative to fluoroscopy for percutaneous lesioning of the Gasserian ganglion. Additional study is required under operational settings.