ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The significance of HER-2/neu results obtained by immunohistochemical analyses (IHC) which are neither negative nor strongly positive is controversial. The incidence of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) positivity in these tumors is small and the implication is that these borderline results represent laboratory misclassification. We analyzed the tumor characteristics of these HER-2/neu borderline tumors to determine if they represent a unique tumor type. METHODS: HER-2/neu status was determined by image analysis (IA) of IHC sections in 669 cases of invasive breast cancer. Borderline cases were reflexed to FISH to determine gene status. HER-2/neu results were compared to tumor morphology and other tumor markers. RESULTS: HER-2/neu was negative, borderline and positive in 69.5, 15.8, and 14.6% of cases, respectively. HER-2/neu amplification was present in 17.3% of borderline cases. The borderline group is significantly different from the HER-2/neu positive group for all parameters studied except Ki-67. Compared to the HER-2/neu negative group, the borderline group showed a significantly higher HER-2/neu gene copy number and a trend towards lower progesterone receptor expression (p=0.058). Compared to the HER-2/neu negative group, the HER-2/neu borderline/FISH-negative group showed significantly lower PR expression. Compared to the HER-2/neu positive group, the HER-2/neu borderline/FISH positive group showed significant differences with multiple parameters. CONCLUSION: Borderline HER-2/neu tumors are a unique tumor type and do not represent laboratory imprecision. Hormone receptor alterations are associated with early changes in HER-2/neu expression. While IA is capable of detecting these changes, current FISH methodology is not.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/metabolism , Carcinoma/pathology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Receptor, ErbB-2/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnoses were correlated with results of a Co(II)-albumin binding assay in 167 patients treated at an emergency department of a health maintenance organization. METHODS: Patients were evaluated as being nonischemic or potentially ischemic through standard coronary disease indicators [creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, cardiac troponin I, and electrocardiographic findings] and were tested by a Co(II)-albumin binding assay. Samples were tested anonymously, and the study was double-blinded. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay for the detection of ischemia were evaluated by ROC curve analysis. Known Co(II) binding sites on albumin were analyzed by N-terminal amino acid sequencing. RESULTS: The mean absorbance units (ABSU) +/- 2 SD for non-myocardial ischemic and myocardial ischemic individuals measured at 470 nm were 0.43 +/- 0.10 and 0.63 +/- 0.25, respectively (P <0.0001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92-0.99], and at a cutoff value of 0.50 ABSU, sensitivity and specificity were 88% (78-94%) and 94% (86-98%), respectively, suggesting a high distinction between the two groups. When we compared non-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and AMI ischemic individuals, the area under the ROC curve was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.79) and was considered a poor discriminator between these two groups. N-Terminal amino acid sequencing data for purified albumin showed normal amino acid residues for six of seven high-ABSU (> or =0.70) individuals and one nonischemic individual tested. However, only one individual with a high ABSU (0.80) had two missing amino acid residues (DA) from the N-terminal region. Clinical diagnosis for this patient did not reveal an ischemic event. CONCLUSIONS: The Co(II)-albumin binding test may serve as a useful diagnostic tool in emergency facilities for the assessment of myocardial ischemia. High and low ABSU were associated with myocardial ischemic individuals and non-myocardial ischemic individuals, respectively. However, the Co(II)-albumin binding was a poor discriminator between ischemic individuals with and without MI.
