ABSTRACT
Diabetic foot ulcers represent the most frequently recognized and highest risk factor among patients affected by diabetes mellitus. The associated recurrent rate is high, and amputation of the foot or lower limb is often required due to infection. Analysis of infrared thermograms covering the entire plantar aspect of both feet is considered an emerging area of research focused on identifying at an early stage the underlying conditions that sustain skin and tissue damage prior to the onset of superficial wounds. The identification of foot disorders at an early stage using thermography requires establishing a subset of relevant features to reduce decision variability and data misinterpretation and provide a better overall cost-performance for classification. The lack of standardization among thermograms as well as the unbalanced datasets towards diabetic cases hinder the establishment of this suitable subset of features. To date, most studies published are mainly based on the exploitation of the publicly available INAOE dataset, which is composed of thermogram images of healthy and diabetic subjects. However, a recently released dataset, STANDUP, provided data for extending the current state of the art. In this work, an extended and more generalized dataset was employed. A comparison was performed between the more relevant and robust features, previously extracted from the INAOE dataset, with the features extracted from the extended dataset. These features were obtained through state-of-the-art methodologies, including two classical approaches, lasso and random forest, and two variational deep learning-based methods. The extracted features were used as an input to a support vector machine classifier to distinguish between diabetic and healthy subjects. The performance metrics employed confirmed the effectiveness of both the methodology and the state-of-the-art features subsequently extracted. Most importantly, their performance was also demonstrated when considering the generalization achieved through the integration of input datasets. Notably, features associated with the MCA and LPA angiosomes seemed the most relevant.
ABSTRACT
Biometric identification uses person recognition techniques based on the extraction of some of their physical or biological properties, which make it possible to characterize and differentiate one person from another and provide irreplaceable and critical information that is suitable for application in security systems. The extraction of information from the electrical biosignal of the human brain has received a great deal of attention in recent years. Analysis of EEG signals has been widely used over the last century in medicine and as a basis for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). In addition, the application of EEG signals for biometric recognition has recently been demonstrated. In this context, EEG-based biometric systems are often considered in two different applications: identification (one-to-many classification) and authentication (one-to-one or true/false classification). In this article, we establish a methodology for selecting and reducing the minimum number of EEG sensors necessary to carry out effective biometric identification of individuals. Two methodologies were applied, one based on principal component analysis and the other on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test in order to reduce the number of electrodes. This allowed us to identify, according to the methodology used, the areas of the cerebral cortex that would allow selection of the minimum number of electrodes necessary for the identification of individuals. The methodologies were applied to two databases, one with 13 people with self-collected recordings using low-cost EEG equipment, EMOTIV EPOC+, and another publicly available database with recordings from 109 people provided by the PhysioNet BCI.
