Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform ; 27(1): 75-91, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11248942

ABSTRACT

The present research examines semantic priming from attended and unattended parafoveal words. Participants made a lexical decision in response to a single central target. The target was preceded by two parafoveal prime words, with one of them (the attended prime) being precued by a peripheral cue. The main variables manipulated across experiments were cue informativeness (valid vs. neutral cues) and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between prime and probe (200, 300, 600, or 1,000 ms). The results showed (a) reliable semantic priming from both attended and ignored prime words and (b) that the ignored priming effects were either negative or positive, depending on both the prime-probe SOA and cue informativeness. The present findings are discussed in relation to inhibitory versus episodic retrieval models of negative priming.


Subject(s)
Cues , Decision Making , Semantics , Vocabulary , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Random Allocation , Reaction Time
2.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 84(3): 213-29, 1993 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8128904

ABSTRACT

In this study we used a modified Stroop word-color task in which the target was a centrally fixated color frame and the distractor was an incompatible, compatible or non-color word. In Experiment 1 distractors were located either within (the inside condition) or outside the frame, at distances of 1.3 deg (near-outside condition) or 2 deg (far-outside condition). In Experiment 2 only the inside and the far conditions were used. The stimuli were on the screen for 150 msec (Experiment 1) or 50 msec (Experiment 2). A non-distractor condition was also included. In Experiment 1, incompatible distractors interfered with naming target colors, and this effect disappeared when the distractor was located far from the target. However, facilitation from compatible distractors was reliable in the farther location. These results were replicated in Experiment 2. The data suggest that (1) unattended items are processed semantically; (2) that facilitation and interference from words in color naming tasks can be caused by different mechanisms; and (3) that distractors are processed differently according to whether they are near or far from fixation.


Subject(s)
Attention , Color Perception , Reading , Semantics , Visual Fields , Adolescent , Adult , Discrimination Learning , Female , Humans , Male , Orientation , Reaction Time
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...