Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 2024 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39365365

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Real-world evidence on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) management in Spain is limited. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in this population. METHODS/PATIENTS: This retrospective observational study included all adults with a first diagnosis/record of la/mUC (index date) from January 2015 to June 2020 at nine university hospitals in Spain. Data were collected up to December 31, 2020 (end of study), death, or loss to follow-up. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from index date (Kaplan-Meier estimates), and disease-specific HCRU were described. RESULTS: Among 829 patients, median age at diagnosis was 71 years; 70.2% had ≥ 1 comorbidity, and 52.5% were eligible for cisplatin. Median follow-up was 12.7 months. Most (84.7%) patients received first-line systemic treatment; of these, 46.9% (n = 329) received second-line and 16.6% (n = 116) received third-line therapy. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment in all lines of therapy, followed by programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors. Median (95% confidence interval) OS and PFS were 18.8 (17.5-21.5) and 9.9 (8.9-10.5) months, respectively. Most patients required ≥ 1 outpatient visit (71.8%), inpatient admission (56.6%), or emergency department visit (56.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic patterns were consistent with Spanish guideline recommendations. Chemotherapy had a role in first-line treatment of la/mUC in Spain during the study period. However, the disease burden remains high, and new first-line treatments recommended in the latest European guidelines should be made available to patients in Spain.

2.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1222-1231, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39258976

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Evaluate existing oncology value frameworks in terms of their methodology, structure, characteristics, and functionality using the example of enfortumab vedotin, an approved therapy for urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: A search of PubMed, grey literature, and official websites of relevant international organizations was performed from January 2022 to March 2023. RESULTS: Six frameworks were identified and analyzed, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology's assessment framework, European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Evidence Blocks, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's DrugAbacus, Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's assessment framework, and the Drug Assessment Framework. Comparisons across frameworks were challenging, owing to differing approaches, objectives, perspectives, methodology, and criteria. Based on the results of the EV-301 study (NCT03474107), the European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale assigned a score of 4 out of 5 to enfortumab vedotin administered after chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Evidence Blocks enabled assessment of enfortumab vedotin compared with other treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, resulting in the positioning of enfortumab vedotin as a preferred regimen after chemotherapy and immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Application of value frameworks in oncology can contribute to informed value-based decision-making. However, comparisons across frameworks should be made with caution and limited to the same lines of treatment. Enfortumab vedotin may contribute to optimizing outcomes in patients previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 76(1): 98-106, 28 feb. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-217472

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the economic impact associated with overactive bladder (OAB) patients, treated with mirabegron or antimuscarinics (AM) in Spain, over a 12-month period. Methods: A probabilistic model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) was used in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients with OAB and a time horizon of 12 months. The use of resources was obtained from the retrospective observational study MIRACAT that included 3330 patients with OAB. The analysis was carried out from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) including that of society with the indirect cost of abseenteism in a sensitivity analysis. Unit costs were obtained from Spanish public healthcare prices (€ 2021) and from previously published Spanish studies. Results: The annual average savings for the NHS for each patient with OAB treated with mirabegron would be € 1135 (95%confidence interval (CI) € 390; 2421) compared with a patient treated with AM. Annual average savings were maintained in all the sensitivity analyses carried out, ranging from a minimum of € 299 to a maximum of € 3381 per patient. The substitution of 25% of the AM treatments (for 81534 patients) to mirabegron would generate, within 1 year, savings for the NHS of € 92 million (95% CI € 31; 197 million). Conclusions: According to the present model, the treatment of OAB with mirabegron would generate savings compared with treatment with AM in all scenarios and sensitivity analysis performed, and for the NHS and for society perspectives (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/economics , Muscarinic Antagonists/economics , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Retrospective Studies , Spain
4.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 72(3): 252-258, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29330166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are large inequalities in levels of physical activity in the UK, and this is an important determinant of health inequalities. Little is known about the effectiveness of community-wide interventions to increase physical activity and whether effects differ by socioeconomic group. METHODS: We conducted interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analyses using local administrative data and a large national survey to investigate the impact of an intervention providing universal free access to leisure facilities alongside outreach and marketing activities in a deprived local authority area in the northwest of England. Outcomes included attendances at swimming and gym sessions, self-reported participation in gym and swim activity and any physical activity. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a 64% increase in attendances at swimming and gym sessions (relative risk 1.64, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.89, P<0.001), an additional 3.9% of the population participating in at least 30 min of moderate-intensity gym or swim sessions during the previous four weeks (95% CI 3.6 to 4.1) and an additional 1.9% of the population participating in any sport or active recreation of at least moderate intensity for at least 30 min on at least 12 days out of the last four weeks (95% CI 1.7 to 2.1). The effect on gym and swim activity and overall levels of participation in physical activity was significantly greater for the more disadvantaged socioeconomic group. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that removing user charges from leisure facilities in combination with outreach and marketing activities can increase overall population levels of physical activity while reducing inequalities.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Health Promotion/methods , Health Status Disparities , Leisure Activities , Adolescent , Adult , Community-Institutional Relations , England , Female , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
5.
Scott J Polit Econ ; 59(1): 47-70, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22329057

ABSTRACT

Using a sequence of questions from the 1996 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we explore the implications of interpersonal differences in parent's attitudes towards risk for the academic test scores of their children focusing on information drawn from the 1997 Child Development Supplement of the PSID. In addition, we explore whether parental risk preference influences whether the child subsequently attends college. Our findings suggest that a parent's degree of risk aversion is inversely related to the academic test scores of their children as well as being inversely related to the probability of attending college post high school.


Subject(s)
Child Welfare , Education , Parents , Risk-Taking , Socioeconomic Factors , Test Taking Skills , Child , Child Development , Child Welfare/economics , Child Welfare/ethnology , Child Welfare/history , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Welfare/psychology , Child, Preschool , Education/economics , Education/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Income/history , Parents/education , Parents/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors/history , Test Taking Skills/economics , Test Taking Skills/history , Test Taking Skills/psychology , United States/ethnology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL