Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Schemes.

BACKGROUND: Multiple cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnostic schemes have been published. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the association of different CS diagnostic schemes with adverse outcomes. The diagnostic schemes evaluated were 1993, 2006, and 2017 Japanese criteria and the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria. METHODS: Data were collected from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium, an international registry of CS patients. Outcome events were any of the following: all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device placement, heart transplantation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of outcomes with each CS diagnostic scheme. RESULTS: A total of 587 subjects met the following criteria: 1993 Japanese (n = 310, 52.8%), 2006 Japanese (n = 312, 53.2%), 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (n = 480, 81.8%), and 2017 Japanese (n = 112, 19.1%). Patients who met the 1993 criteria were more likely to experience an event than patients who did not (n = 109 of 310, 35.2% vs n = 59 of 277, 21.3%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38-2.90; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who met the 2006 criteria were more likely to have an event than patients who did not (n = 116 of 312, 37.2% vs n = 52 of 275, 18.9%; OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.74-3.71; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of an event and whether a patient met the 2014 or the 2017 criteria (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.85-2.27; P = 0.18 or OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.97-2.33; P = 0.067, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CS patients who met the 1993 and the 2006 criteria had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to prospectively evaluate existing diagnostic schemes and develop new risk models for this complex disease.

Update on cardiac sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an inflammatory myocardial disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the deposition of non-caseating granulomas that may involve any part of the heart. Cardiac sarcoidosis is often under-diagnosed or recognized partly due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation of the disease. The three most frequent clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis are atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. A definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis can be made with histology findings from an endomyocardial biopsy. However, the diagnosis in the majority of cases is based on findings from the clinical presentation and advanced imaging due to the low sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2014 expert consensus statement and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare criteria are the two most commonly used diagnostic criteria sets. This review article summarizes the available evidence on cardiac sarcoidosis, focusing on the diagnostic criteria and stepwise approach to its management.

Real-world experience with implantable loop recorder monitoring to detect subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke: The value of p wave dispersion in predicting arrhythmia occurrence.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized patients implanted with ILRs for cryptogenic stroke in "real life" clinical practice will show an AF detection rate comparable to prior clinical studies, and that clinical or imaging features may help to identify those at higher risk of AF detection. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who presented with cryptogenic stroke and received an ILR at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2017 with an active inpatient stroke service. The electronic health record and remote monitoring were used to identify occurrence of AF. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients who received ILRs for cryptogenic stroke were included. Overall, after a thorough evaluation for other etiologies of stroke, 35 (19.6%) were found to have AF detected. Mean follow-up was 365 days with a median time to detection of 131 days. Advanced age (p = 0.001), diastolic dysfunction on echo (p = 0.03), as well as ECG findings of premature atrial contractions (PACs) and p wave dispersion (PWD) > 40 ms were found to be predictive of AF detection (p = 0.04, p < 0.001, respectively). On multiple regression analysis, the only independent predictor of AF detection was PWD > 40 ms. CONCLUSION: After a thorough evaluation to exclude other etiologies for stroke, approximately 20% of patients of our cryptogenic stroke population were found to have AF with ILR surveillance. Advanced age, diastolic dysfunction, as well as ECG findings of PACs and increased PWD may help to predict those at higher risk of AF detection, while PWD was the only independent predictor. This has important clinical implications, as better prediction of AF may help identify those at highest risk and might subsequently aid in guiding therapy.

The various manifestations of concealed nodofascicular/nodoventricular bypass tracts.

BACKGROUND: The various arrhythmic manifestations of concealed nodofascicular (NF)/nodoventricular (NV) bypass tracts (BPTs) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to define diagnostic criteria for supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) associated with concealed nodal pathways (NPs). METHODS: We reviewed 11 patients with concealed NPs who underwent electrophysiology study and ablation for symptomatic SVT. RESULTS: Of 11 patients 7 (64% women; mean age 54 ± 16 years), NF/NV BPTs were active bystanders during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (atypical [n = 4]; typical [n =2]) or participants during orthodromic NF/NV reentrant tachycardia (n = 5). The majority (10 of 11 [91%]) had nodal origin in the slow pathway (SP) and 7 of 11 (64%) presented as long RP SVT. Ablation of the SP targeting the right (n = 10) or left (n = 1) inferior extension eliminated concealed NP-associated SVTs in all patients. CONCLUSION: Concealed NF/NV BPTs are active bystanders equally as common as participants during SVT. They typically insert into the SP and often present as long RP SVT. SP ablation eliminates concealed NF/NV BPT-associated SVTs regardless of the mechanism.

Gender Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and In-Hospital Outcome of Patients Admitted With Heart Failure Complicated by Atrial Fibrillation (from the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF] Registry).

Almost 25% of patients with heart failure (HF) have coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF), the latter of which may increase morbidity and mortality. Despite the high prevalence of HF with concomitant AF, this subgroup of patients remains understudied. This study examines gender differences in presentation, treatment and in-hospital outcome of patients with HF and AF. The Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) database enrolled 6,496 patients with HF who presented to Cooper University Hospital from 2005 to 2012. Twenty-four percent (1,561 patients) had concomitant AF. Pearson chi-square tests and the Student T-tests were used to compare patient characteristics by gender. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict in-hospital mortality. Six hundred sixty-nine (42.8%) patients with HF and AF were women. Women were older (p <0.001), had a higher ejection fraction (p <0.001), had systolic hypertension (p <0.001), and were more likely to have health insurance (p <0.001). Despite a higher CHADS2 score in women (p = 0.007), there was no gender difference in percent of anticoagulation medications prescribed before admission. Women were less likely to present with dizziness, lightheadedness, or syncope, and were more likely to be compliant with medications and diet recommendations before admission. Despite differences in presentation, co-morbidities, and therapy, in-hospital mortality was similar between men and women. Decreased appetite or early satiety predicted in-hospital mortality in women, whereas age, chest pain on admission, and decreased appetite or early satiety predicted in-hospital mortality in men. In conclusion, women presenting with HF complicated by AF clinically differ from men, but despite these differences, both groups shared similar symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality rates.

Characteristics and early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing totally subcutaneous vs. transvenous single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.

Aims: In 2012, the first totally Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (S-ICD) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. A possible benefit of this device is that it does not involve placing leads 'in' or 'on' the heart, potentially reducing complications. Methods amd results: Ninety-one S-ICD and 182 single chamber TV-ICD implants were performed between 10/22/2012 and 9/22/2015. During this period of time, 91 patients with S-ICD were matched to TV-ICD patients using single centre NCDR ICD Registry Data based on dialysis status, gender, and age. Intra- and post-operative complications and deaths were examined within the first 180 days following implantation. Patients with S-ICDs had higher creatinine (2.3 ± 2.5 vs. 1.1 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and were more likely to be on chronic dialysis (20.9% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001) than TV-ICD patients. Patients in the S-ICD group were more likely to have had prior device infections (14.3% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.021) as well as prior TIA/CVA (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.049) compared to patients in the TV-ICD group. Seven patients experienced 7 complications or death in TV-ICD group and 5 patients experienced 7 complications or death in SQ-ICD group, P = 0.774. Conclusion: In this retrospective matched single centre cohort study, there was no significant difference in implantation complications or death in patients receiving single chamber TV-ICDs compared to S-ICDs within 6 months following implantation. This occurred despite more severe preexisting illness in the S-ICD group. Further investigation is needed to determine outcomes after longer-term follow-up.

Outcomes of patients with definite and suspected isolated cardiac sarcoidosis treated with an implantable cardiac defibrillator.

PURPOSE: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) patients are at increased risk for sudden death. Isolated CS is rare and can be difficult to diagnose. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective review, patients with CS and an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) were identified. RESULTS: Of 235 patients with CS and ICD, 13 (5.5 %) had isolated CS, including 7 (3.0 %) with definite isolated CS (biopsy or necropsy-proven) and 6 (2.6 %) with suspected isolated CS based on a constellation of clinical, ECG, and imaging findings. Among 13 patients with isolated CS, 10 (76.9 %) were male, mean age was 53.8 ± 7.6 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38.3 ± 16.5. Diagnosis was made by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (n = 2), biopsy (n = 3), CMR and biopsy (n = 2), CMR and positron emission tomography (PET) (n = 2), PET (n = 1), late enhanced cardiac CT (n = 1), pathology at heart transplant (n = 1), and autopsy (n = 1). Eight of 13 (61.5 %) patients with isolated CS had a secondary prevention indication (VT in 6 and VF in 2) vs. 80 of 222 (36.0 %) with sarcoidosis in other organs (p = 0.04). Over a mean of 4.2 years, 9 of 13 (69.2 %) patients with isolated CS received appropriate ICD therapy, including anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or shock, compared with 75 of 222 (33.8 %) patients with cardiac and extracardiac sarcoidosis (p = 0.0150). Six of 7 (85.7 %) patients with definite isolated CS received appropriate ICD intervention, compared with 78 of 228 patients (34.2 %) without definite isolated CS (p = 0.0192.) CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients with isolated CS had very high rates of appropriate ICD therapy. Prospective, long-term follow-up of consecutive patients with isolated CS is needed to determine the true natural history and rates of ventricular arrhythmias in this rare and difficult-to-diagnose disease.

Double, double...What's the trouble?

Parasystole can be subtle, making the diagnosis difficult to recognize.

Efficacy and safety of implantable cardiac defibrillators for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

AIMS: Implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation is a class IIA recommendation for patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of ICDs in this population. The goal of this multicentre retrospective data review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICDs in patients with CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrophysiologists at academic medical centres were asked to identify consecutive patients with CS and an ICD. Clinical information, ICD therapy history, and device complications were collected for each patient. Data were collected on 235 patients from 13 institutions, 64.7% male with mean age 55.6 ± 11.1. Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 4.0 years, 85 of 234 (36.2%) patients received an appropriate ICD therapy (shocks and/or anti-tachycardia pacing) and 67 of 226 (29.7%) received an appropriate shock. Fifty-seven of 235 patients (24.3%) received a total of 222 inappropriate shocks. Forty-six adverse events occurred in 41 of 235 patients (17.4%). Patients who received appropriate ICD therapies were more likely to be male (73.8 vs. 59.6%, P = 0.0330), have a history of syncope (40.5 vs. 22.5%, P = 0.0044), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (38.1 ± 15.2 vs. 48.8 ± 14.7%, P ≤ 0.0001), ventricular pacing on baseline electrocardiogram (16.1 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.0002), and a secondary prevention indication (60.7 vs. 24.5%, P < 0.0001) compared with those who did not receive appropriate ICD therapies. CONCLUSION: Patients with CS and ICDs are at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. This population also has high rates of inappropriate shocks and device complications.

Is the device working properly?

Normal pacemaker and defibrillator function can occasionally mimic device malfunction. A thorough understanding of timing cycles and familiarity with company-specific pacing algorithms can often avoid unnecessary confusion.