Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 15(4): 1161-8, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18196343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreas is a possible site of metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of this study was to define the role of surgery in their treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 36 patients with pancreatic metastasis from RCC observed between January 1998 and February 2006. Patients were categorized into three risk groups according to the modified Memorial Sloan-Kettering prognostic factors model. RESULTS: Resective surgery was performed in 23 patients, as follows: 11 distal pancreatectomy, 5 enucleation, 4 pancreatoduodenectomy, 2 total pancreatectomy, and 1 middle pancreatectomy. No perioperative mortality was observed; the morbidity rate was 47.8%. All patients who underwent resection belonged to the favorable risk group. Surgical resection was excluded in 13 cases because of locally advanced disease (2 cases) or extrapancreatic disease (11 cases); 5 of these patients were at favorable, 7 at intermediate, and 1 at poor risk. In patients undergoing surgery, the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 88%, and median disease-free survival was 44 months. Patients who did not undergo surgery had a 5-year survival rate of 47%, with a median survival time of 27 months (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pancreatic metastases from RCC belonging to a favorable risk group are candidates for resection, even in the presence of another metastatic site or multifocal pancreatic disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/secondary , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 49(4): 427-32, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16456637

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the efficacy of two different "chemical sphincterotomies" for chronic anal fissure. METHODS: From January to December 2001, 30 consecutive patients (17 males; mean age, 41.8 years) with chronic posterior anal fissure were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.2 percent glycerine trinitrate ointment applied three times daily at the anal margin for eight weeks (Group A) or 20 units Botulinum toxin A injection into the internal anal sphincter on each side of the anterior midline (Group B). The patients were reviewed at 15 days, 1, 3, 6, 12, and every other 12 months. Follow-up ranged between 36 and 46 months. Patients in either group who failed to improve were referred for surgical treatment. RESULTS: Twelve patients in Group A and 11 in Group B had improvement or relief from symptoms at the first visit. The fissure was healed in ten patients in Group A and in eight in Group B within three months (66.7 and 57.1 percent). Recurrence of the fissure occurred in five patients in each group during the follow-up. The healing rate at three years was 40 and 33.3 percent for Group A and B, respectively. No patients in either group reported serious adverse effects; however, three patients in Group A (20 percent) had transient headache. None had fecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Both treatments may be considered as first-line treatment even if less effective than surgery.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Fissure in Ano/drug therapy , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Nitroglycerin/therapeutic use , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...