ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the prevalence and disparity of chronic opioid usage in surgical patients and the potential risk factors associated with chronic opioid usage. BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid usage is common in surgical patients; however, the characteristics of opioid usage in surgical patients is unclear. In this study, we hypothesize that the prevalence of chronic opioid usage in surgical patients is high, and that significant disparities may exist among different surgical populations. METHODS: Data of opioid usage in outpatients among different surgical services were extracted from the electronic medical record database. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of sex, age, race, body mass index (BMI), specialty visited, duration of opioid use, and opioid type were collected. Chronic opioid users were defined as patients who had been recorded as taking opioids for at least 90 days determined by the first and last visit dates under opioid usage during the investigation. RESULTS: There were 79,123 patients included in this study. The average prevalence is 9.2%, ranging from 4.4% to 23.8% among various specialties. The prevalence in orthopedics (23.8%), neurosurgery (18.7%), and gastrointestinal surgery (14.4%) ranked in the top three subspecialties. Major factors influencing chronic opioid use include age, Ethnicitiy, Subspecialtiy, and multiple specialty visits. Approximately 75% of chronic users took opioids that belong to the category II Drug Enforcement Administration classification. CONCLUSIONS: Overall prevalence of chronic opioid usage in surgical patients is high with widespread disparity among different sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, and subspecialty groups. Information obtained from this study provides clues to reduce chronic opioid usage in surgical patients.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
This article provides a snap shot of the current position and recent developments in chaplaincy in health care settings particularly in England, Scotland, the United States of America and Australia in order to guide the emerging modernization agenda in the Australian context, and to assist the acceleration of the local adoption of best practice in pastoral care. Over all, the picture is one of change. As hospitals develop to meet new performance expectations services that work within the hospital system, such as chaplaincy and pastoral care, must also adapt. Rather than chaplaincy being discarded as marginal during these changes, recent research evidence supports the inclusion of pastoral care in holistic health care. Demographic changes also mean that pastoral care needs to have an emphasis on spiritual support if it is to respond to patients of other faith traditions or with secular beliefs.
