Clinical Results of a Monofocal Aspheric Bitoric Intraocular Lens with Plate Haptics in Hyperopic Eyes.

Purpose: To assess the refractive and visual outcomes of hyperopic and astigmatic eyes implanted with a monofocal, aspheric, bitoric intraocular lens (IOL) with plate haptics following cataract surgery. Methods: The study evaluated 51 eyes implanted with the AT TORBI 709M IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) during a follow-up of 12-months. Refractive error, rotational stability, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and contrast sensitivity were analyzed at 1-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery. Results: At 12 months, the cumulative CDVA was 20/25 in 94.12% of eyes and 20/32 or better in 98.04%. The UDVA was the same as, or better than, the CDVA in 88.24% of eyes. The mean logMAR UDVA and CDVA values were 0.06 ± 0.11 and 0.00 ± 0.08, respectively. In addition, 92.16% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 98.04% were within ±1.00 D of a spherical equivalent, and 86.27% of eyes had refractive astigmatism ≤0.50D and 100% were ≤1.00D. The mean spherical equivalent was 0.21 ± 0.31D and the mean refractive cylinder 0.34 ± 0.27D. The IOL rotation was 1.18 ± 1.35 degrees and all eyes had a rotation ≤5 degrees. The log contrast sensitivity functions were good and similar for all spatial frequencies during follow-up. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that implantation of the AT TORBI 709M IOL in hyperopic and astigmatic eyes is effective and safe. The visual and refractive outcomes were good, showing excellent rotational stability.

Surgical Efficiency Comparison Between Two Phacoemulsification Systems.

Purpose: To assess the surgical efficiency in cataract surgery comparing two phacoemulsification systems. Methods: Prospective, consecutive-comparative study in a two-site private practice. Three hundred and one eyes undergoing standard or femtosecond laser-assisted (FLACS) cataract surgery with either the R-Evo Smart (BVI, Waltham, USA) and/or the Centurion Vision System (Alcon, Fort Worth, USA). Preoperative eye characteristics (degree of cataract using the lens opacities classification system LOCS III grading) and intraoperative outcomes (total ultrasound time and total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting) were registered in all cases. Results: One hundred and fifty-five eyes undergone cataract surgery with the R-Evo Smart and 146 eyes with the Centurion Vision System phacoemulsification systems. Mean cataract grade was 3.07 ± 0.78 and 2.96 ± 0.85 for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.12). Mean total ultrasound time was 18.99 ± 12.85 and 40.24 ± 21.91 seconds for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Mean total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting was 53.00 ± 14.56 g and 54.33 ± 14.88 cc for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.21). Considering non-FLACS surgery (98 eyes with the R-Evo Smart and 63 eyes with the Centurion Vision System), mean cataract grade was 2.95 ± 0.74 and 2.97 ± 0.91 for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.44). Mean total ultrasound time was 19.96 ± 11.20 and 42.84 ± 28.35 seconds for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Mean total estimated fluid aspirated/drainage bag weighting was 55.95 ± 14.76 g and 55.97 ± 13.62 cc for the R-Evo Smart and Centurion Vision System groups, respectively (p = 0.49). No adverse events were found in the two groups of eyes. Conclusion: The objective measurement of surgical efficiency through total ultrasound time during lens removal and fluid consumption during both lens removal and irrigation/aspiration proved R-Evo Smart to be an efficient phacoemulsification platform, in comparison with the current standard of care Centurion Vision System.

Non-diffractive, toric, extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in eyes with low corneal astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: To assess clinical outcomes after implanting toric, extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (IOLs) to correct low corneal astigmatism in eyes with cataracts. METHODS: 47 eyes were implanted with the AcrySof IQ Vivity Toric DFT215 IOL. Main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA/CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate (UIVA/DCIVA), and uncorrected near and distance-corrected near (UNVA/DCNVA) visual acuities, monocular defocus curve, rotational stability, and IOLSAT and QUVID questionnaires. Patients were assessed at 3 months postsurgery. RESULTS: All eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ± 0.50 D and 97.87% (n = 46) had a refractive cylinder ≤ 0.50 D. The mean SE and refractive cylinder were - 0.10 ± 0.17 D and - 0.16 ± 0.24 D, respectively. The CDVA was ≥ 20/25 and ≥ 20/32 in 95.74% (n = 45) and 97.87% (n = 46) of eyes, respectively. The DCIVA was ≥ 20/32 in 85.11% (n = 40) of eyes and the DCNVA was ≥ 20/40 in 74.47% (n = 35). The mean values of CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were - 0.02 ± 0.08, 0.14 ± 0.09, and 0.23 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively. The defocus curve revealed good visual acuity at far and intermediate distances with a depth-of-focus of about 1.75 D. IOL rotation was 0.74 ± 1.13 degrees and all eyes had a rotation of less than 5 degrees. Patients reported either good or very good postoperative vision without eyeglasses under bright-light-conditions at distance (87.80%, 36/41) and intermediate distance (92.68%, 38/41). Between about 63.83%-72.34% (30-34) of patients reported no starburst, halos, or glare, or if experienced, were not bothersome. CONCLUSIONS: The Vivity toric IOL implanted in eyes with low-astigmatism provides accurate refractive outcomes, good visual acuity at different distances and excellent rotational stability. Trial Registration The study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00030579).

Clinical Performance of a New Trifocal IOL with a 7.0 mm Optical Zone.

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a 7.0 mm optical zone. Methods: A total of 23 patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Triva-aXAY IOL were analyzed at 6 months post-surgery. The main outcome measures were refractive error, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and corrected-distance intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CDIVA) at 60 cm, uncorrected and corrected-distance near visual acuity (UNVA, CDNVA) at 40 cm, and binocular defocus curve. Patients also completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Results: All eyes were within ±1.00D, and 91.30% of eyes within ±0.50D, with a mean postoperative spherical equivalent of -0.14±0.29D. Similarly, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UDVA ≥20/25, compared to 100% for CDVA, and the mean binocular UDVA and CDVA were 0.02±0.06 and 0.00±0.05 logMAR, respectively. At intermediate vision, 65.22% of patients showed a binocular UIVA ≥20/25, compared to 86.96% for CDIVA, and the mean binocular UIVA and CDIVA were 0.07±0.06 and 0.06±0.06 logMAR, respectively. At near, 95.65% of patients showed a binocular UNVA and CDNVA ≥20/25, with a mean binocular UDNVA and CDNVA of 0.04±0.07 and 0.02±0.05 logMAR, respectively. Finally, 95.65% of patients reported being quite satisfied to very satisfied with their vision and about 74% did not report any difficulty with their vision in their everyday life. Between 65.22% and 100% of patients reported no difficulty performing different tasks. Conclusion: Our study shows good visual and refractive outcomes with high satisfaction in patients implanted with the Triva-aXAY IOL with a 7.0 mm optical zone.

Agreement of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the IOLMaster 700 Optical Biometers in Myopic Eyes.

Purpose: To assess the agreement in automated corneal diameter (CD) and anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) distances measurements between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 optical biometers in myopic eyes. Methods: One hundred and sixteen eyes of 116 myopic patients aged between 21 to 60 years were included in this study. Measurements of CD and ACD distances were taken with each biometer for all patients in the same session. A t-test and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant when the measurements were compared. The agreement between biometers was studied by applying a Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean CD values obtained using the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers were 12.26±0.35 mm and 12.13±0.34 mm, respectively. The mean ACD distance values were 3.61±0.29 mm and 3.62±0.31, for the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two devices only for CD measurements (p<0.001), but not for ACD measurements (p=0.26). The limits of agreement obtained were wide in both types of measurements, being 0.422 mm for the CD distance and 0.389 mm for the ACD distance. Conclusion: There were statistically significant differences between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers regarding CD but not in ACD measurements in healthy myopic eyes. These differences could be clinically significant in some cases. According to these results, medical judgement should be used to assess whether the two devices could be used interchangeably for CD and ACD measurements during the clinical practice.

Visual and Refractive Outcomes of a Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Implanted in Eyes With High Corneal Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To analyze the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with high degrees of corneal astigmatism. METHODS: A total of 29 eyes from 21 patients who underwent implantation of a trifocal toric IOL (FineVision PODFT; PhysIOL) were evaluated in this study. Phacoemulsification with femto-second laser and intraoperative aberrometry were performed in all cases. All IOLs used exhibited a cylinder power of 3.75 diopters (D) or greater. The main outcome measures were refractive error and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) values. Eyes were evaluated during a follow-up period of 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 96.30%, 100%, 95.83%, and 89.47% of eyes were within ±1.00 D at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postoperatively, respectively. Furthermore, 92.31%, 86.36%, 82.61%, and 84.21% of eyes showed a refractive cylinder value of ±1.00 D at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postoperatively, respectively. During the entire follow-up period, between 81.48% and 91.30% of eyes showed a CDVA of 20/25 or better. The mean monocular Snellen decimal CDVA values were 0.90 ± 0.12, 0.90 ± 0.11, 0.91 ± 0.11, and 0.90 ± 0.12 at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years postoperatively, respectively. No significant rotation was reported in any eye during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that use of this trifocal toric IOL in eyes with high amounts of corneal astigmatism provides accurate refractive outcomes with good distance visual acuity. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(4):229-234.].

Contrast Sensitivity and Patient Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Bi-Aspheric Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.

Purpose: To assess contrast sensitivity and patient reported outcomes after uncomplicated cataract surgery with a new bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent bilateral implantation with the Asqelio Trifocal TFLIO130C IOL (AST Products Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) were analyzed at 6 months post-surgery. Binocular contrast sensitivity with and without glare was measured under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) and mesopic conditions (3 cd/m2). Patients were asked to complete the Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire and a visual symptoms questionnaire. Results: Photopic contrast sensitivity values were either within or above normal levels without glare; when glare was induced, the mean sensitivity values dropped just below normal range. Mesopic contrast sensitivity values were above or within normal range both with and without glare, except for 12 cpd with glare, where the mean fell just below the normal range. Differences in binocular contrast sensitivity threshold values with and without glare were significant for all spatial frequencies tested under both photopic and mesopic conditions (p<0.05). The Catquest-9SF questionnaire outcomes showed that 88% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their sight after the surgery, and in all cases, the results indicated no difficulty in performing different daily activities. The visual symptoms questionnaire indicated no relevant visual symptoms regarding frequency, intensity, or bothersomeness after implantation of the trifocal IOL. Conclusion: This novel bi-aspheric diffractive trifocal IOL provides good contrast sensitivity outcomes under bright and dim lighting conditions. Patients were satisfied with the surgery, with no relevant visual symptoms.

Trifocal toric intraocular lenses in eyes with low amount of corneal astigmatism.

AIM: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with low degrees of corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes of 22 patients who underwent implantation a trifocal toric IOL (FineVision PODFT, PhysIOL s.a., Liege, Belgium) were enrolled. Phacoemulsification with femtosecond laser, capsular tension ring insertion and intraoperative aberrometry were performed in all cases. All IOLs used showed a cylinder power of 1.00 D. Main outcome measures were refractive error and corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) values. Eyes were evaluated at 4mo post-surgery. RESULTS: Totally 50% of eyes showed a spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.13 D and all of them within ±0.50 D. The mean SE and refractive cylinder were -0.02±0.23 and -0.16±0.22 D, respectively. Vector analysis revealed that 100% of eyes were within ±0.50 D for the SE and cylindrical components (J0 and J45). Refractive changes were not correlated with keratometric changes (P>0.05) showing that the reduction in astigmatism comes from the trifocal toric IOL. Of 81% and 96% of eyes showed UDVA and CDVA of 20/20, respectively. The postoperative mean values of monocular distance Snellen decimal UDVA and CDVA were 0.97±0.05 and 0.99±0.02 (about 20/20), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the use of this trifocal toric IOL in patients with low amount of astigmatism provides accurate refractive outcomes and enables them to achieve excellent visual acuity.

Alport Syndrome and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery.

We report the surgical management of a patient with bilateral anterior lenticonus due to Alport syndrome using femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) system. A 38-year-old man with Alport syndrome presented to our department with visual loss due to anterior lenticonus in both eyes. Adjustments during bilateral FLACS were performed with the software's calipers to manually delineate the anterior capsulotomy. Multifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) were selected and placed in the posterior chamber with the aid of intraoperative aberrometry. The intended postoperative positioning parameters for the IOL as well as the planned visual acuity and refraction were achieved. The implementation of FLACS and intraoperative wavefront aberrometry is a safe and useful surgical approach for the management of cataract in challenging cases such as patients with anterior lenticonus due to Alport syndrome.