Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
J Infect Prev ; 24(5): 219-222, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37736125

ABSTRACT

Aim/Objections: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a central line maintenance bundle in preventing catheter-related (implanted venous access devices, port) Candida bloodstream infections. Methods: The study encompassed two distinct time periods, namely, pre-bundle and bundle. The number of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) episodes per catheter days for each timeframe was determined. Findings/Results: Upon implementation of the central line bundle, the rate of CRBSI reduced significantly from 4.27 per 1000 central line days in the pre-bundle period to 1.0 per 1000 central line days in the bundle period (p < .001). Discussion: Using a central line bundle to avoid CRBSIs in pediatric cancer patients with ports led to a significant decrease in Candida species-related CRBSIs.

2.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(10): 4625-4632, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555974

ABSTRACT

Catheter-associated bloodstream infection, also known as CLABSI, is the most serious consequence of central venous access devices. These infections increase the risk of mortality and morbidity. The use of central line bundles in clinical settings is increasing worldwide with the purpose of lowering the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infections. In this study, we investigated the effect of implementing a central line bundle for the prevention of CLABSIs, the distribution of pathogens, and the duration of time it took for CLABSIs to develop in patients who had subclavian-inserted central venous catheters. This research project was a cross-sectional study investigation carried out in a pediatric tertiary teaching hospital. Participants consisted of children who had been admitted to the pediatric critical care unit with subclavian catheters during a period of 13 years. We compared the prebundle period with the bundle period for CLABSI specifically focusing on the time to infection, the number of polymicrobial infections, the proportion of Candida parapsilosis, and the percentage of Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). The "prebundle period" included the period from May 2007 to May 2013, and the "bundle period" included the period from June 2013 to June 2020. Throughout the course of the study, a total of 286 cases of CLABSI were documented. Among these patients, 141 (49.3%) had CLABSIs associated with subclavian catheters. During the prebundle period, 55 CLABSIs were diagnosed in 5235 central line days, with an overall rate of 10.5 CLABSIs per 1000 central line days; after the implementation of central line bundle, 86 CLABSIs were diagnosed in 12,450 CL days, with an overall rate of 3.6 CLABSIs per 1000 CL days. This showed a statistically significantly lower rate in the bundle period (p = 0.0126). In the prebundle period, the mean time to develop CLABSI was 15 days, whereas during the bundle period, the mean time to develop CLABSI was 27.9 days, a significantly longer time to onset (p = 0.001). While the percentage of other microorganisms was not statistically different between the prebundle and bundle periods (p > 0.05), the percentage of C. parapsilosis was significantly higher in the prebundle period (p = 0.001).   Conclusion: The results of this study imply that the use of central line bundles not only reduces the incidence of CLABSI but also delays the time to which CLABSI patients acquire an infection. In addition, as a direct consequence of the CLB, the number of CLABSIs caused by gram-positive cocci did not increase, while the proportion of CLABSIs caused by C. parapsilosis decreased. What is Known: • The most significant negative consequence of central venous access devices is catheter-associated bloodstream infections. • "Care bundles" for CLABSI prevention have been reported to reduce the CLABSI rate. What is New: • Consider what would happen if the "Care bundle" failed to prevent CLABSI. • The findings of this study imply that using central line bundles not only reduces the risk of CLABSI but also extends the time it takes for patients to develop CLABSI. While the number of CLABSIs caused by gram-positive cocci did not increase as a direct result of CLB, the rate of CLABSIs caused by C. parapsilosis, which has recently become a major problem, has decreased.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Sepsis , Humans , Child , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Critical Illness/therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Sepsis/etiology , Hospitals, Teaching , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/etiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control
3.
J Mycol Med ; 32(3): 101277, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35452910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Candida species are among the most prevalent microorganisms in pediatric critical care units that cause central line-associated bloodstream infections. The goal of this study was to assess the therapeutic benefit of central line bundle for the prevention of Candida species-related bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care units. DESIGN: The study covered the period from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. Pre-bundle and bundle phases were included in the research. The Clinical Microbiology Laboratory's records revealed episodes of Candida-related central line-associated bloodstream infections. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Dr. Behçet Uz Child Disease and Pediatric Surgery Training and Research Hospital's PICU (which has 24 beds and admits 350 patients per year). PATIENTS: This study included pediatric patients in the pediatric intensive care unit with non-tunneled central venous catheters. INTERVENTIONS: In the pediatric intensive care unit, a central line bundle was started. RESULTS: A total of 236 Candida-related central line-associated bloodstream infections were discovered during the study period. Non-albicans Candida accounted for 83.5% (197) of the total, whereas C.albicans accounted for 16.5%(39). During the pre-bundle period, 137 Candida species were isolated from the patients, while 99 Candida species were isolated during the bundle period. Candida-related central line-associated bloodstream infections dropped from 13.68 to 5.93 per 1000 CL-days after the central line bundle was used (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, the central line bundle greatly reduced central line-associated Candida species bloodstream infections. Central line bundles are an effective scientific solution for preventing Candida-related central line-associated bloodstream infections in hospitals with high Candida prevalence.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Candida , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Child , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Sepsis/complications
4.
J Vasc Access ; 23(6): 885-889, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33983076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infection is one of the four primary health-care-associated infections applicable to pediatric intensive care units defined by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to current guidelines, it is essential to flush vascular access devices before each infusion to assess catheter function and prevent catheter-related complications. OBJECTIVE: This prospective trial aimed to assess the potential differences between pre-filled and manually prepared saline syringe use during vascular access device management in a pediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: Volunteered registered pediatric intensive care unit nurses were asked to implement the flushing solution to an extension line of a central venous catheter in vitro. After the randomization process with opaque sealed envelopes, they have started either with manual preparation or used sterile pre-filled saline syringes. Sterile application steps forms were used for monitoring the manual preparation of saline syringes versus the pre-filled saline syringes phase. Each volunteer repeated the steps for 3, 5, and 10 mL syringe volumes with the manually prepared and pre-filled saline syringes. After completing the procedures, failed steps and durations were transferred into a database to be analyzed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS: A total of 41 nurses volunteered and 123 forms for three attempts per one nurse were filled for each group. In the manual preparation group, the number of at least one failure in the necessary steps was 89 (72.3%) and the same number in the pre-filled syringe group was 6 (4.9%), and significantly lower in the pre-filled saline syringe group (p < 0.001). The overall time for preparing to flush was 86.0 ± 22.3 s (ranging from 46 to 173 s) for manual prepared syringes and 35.2 ± 9.4 s (ranging from 18 to 100 s) (p < 0.001) for pre-filled saline syringes. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the risk for breaking the aseptic no-touch technic was higher in the manual preparation group. We have also demonstrated that the flushing time was shorter with pre-filled syringes compared to manually prepared ones, which may contribute to decreasing the workload of the nurses and may increase the quality of care in the intensive care units. The use of pre-filled saline syringes may decrease the central line-associated bloodstream infections incidence and may increase the quality of care by saving extra time in the pediatric intensive care unit.


Subject(s)
Central Venous Catheters , Syringes , Child , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Prospective Studies , Saline Solution
5.
Turk J Pediatr ; 63(2): 200-205, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its resistance to multiple antibiotics has become a serious challenge since the early 2000s. Especially, community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections that appear mainly as skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) tend to increase worldwide. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the trends in the frequency of SSTIs due to community-acquired S. aureus among children. METHODS: All children with SSTIs caused by culture positive community-acquired S. aureus during the period from 2013 to 2018 were included in this study. Data of the outpatients were collected from medical records. Annual alteration in frequencies of CA-MRSA and community-acquired methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (CAMSSA) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 112 cases was evaluated. Of these, 35 (31.25%) were CA-MRSA. The rates of CA-MRSA had emerged from an increasing annual frequency of 9.5 cases per 10,000 SSTIs as of 2014 to 96.8 cases per 10,000 SSTIs in 2018. The ratio of cases with CA-MRSA to cases with CA-MSSA was 0 - 0.09 in two years of the study period and increased to a maximum ratio of 0.6 - 0.72 in the last two years. Consequently, the frequency of S. aureus in cases with SSTIs was significantly higher in 2016 - 2018 compared to the initial study period within the years of 2013-2015 [p < 0.001, relative risk increase: 7 (2.6-28.7) for CA-MRSA and p=0.002, relative risk increase: 2.1 (1.2-3.5)]. Cases with CA-MRSA increased approximately eight-fold during the six-year-study period. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of CA-MRSA in SSTIs among children increased significantly compared to CA-MSSA. The clinical impact of this increase should be evaluated, especially in patients with SSTI who are unresponsive to empirical treatment.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Soft Tissue Infections , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcal Skin Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 336, 2020 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line bundle programs were found to be effective in decreasing central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in pediatric cancer patients with ports. However, cost-effectiveness studies of central line bundle programs in pediatric cancer patients are limited, and most available data are from intensive care unit or adult studies. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study spanning 6 years, comprehensive assessment of total health care costs attributable to CLABSI's associated with ports between two periods. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the pediatric hematology-oncology ward of Dr. Behçet Uz Children's Hospital from 1 August November 2011 to 31 July 2017. The CLABSI rates decreased significantly from 8.31 CLABSIs to 3.04 per 1000 central line days (p < 0.001). In the pre-bundle period, total attributable costs spent for of patients with CLABSI were $130,661, and in the bundle period, total attributable costs spent for patients with CLABSI were $116,579. Within bundle implantation, 71 potential CLABSI were prevented, which saved an additional $208,977. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that central line bundles decreases not only the CLABSI rate but also decreases attributable costs due to CLABSI. Expenses spent for bundle elements, were covered by savings by preventing CLABSI with higher costs.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Syringes , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Resources , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Neoplasms
8.
J Vasc Access ; 20(6): 604-607, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The optimal scrubbing time for the disinfection of the surface of needleless connectors has not been determined. The evidence for successful needleless connector decontamination with 70% isopropyl alcohol ranges from 5 to 60 s. The aim of this prospective study was to identify colonization on the external surface of needleless connectors on central venous catheters and measure the efficiency of 15 s of scrubbing with 70% alcohol. METHOD: A total of 31 patients were included. Samples were collected adhering to aseptic no-touch technique policies. Two samples were collected from the injectable surface of the needleless connector with sterile sodium chloride 0.9% moistened and a dry swab from the same site. Then the surface was scrubbed with alcohol 70% for 15 s for disinfection and second couples of samples for the cultures were taken after disinfection. FINDINGS: A total of 420 swabs were obtained. The number of colonization (equal or higher than 15 CFU/plate) was present on 21 of the needleless connectors (20.0%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci was responsible for all the colonization. After disinfection for 15 s, no isolation exceeding 1 CFU/plate was present. CONCLUSION: Scrubbing for 15 s with 70% alcohol was found to be successful at elimination of colonization of the surface of needleless connector even in high microorganism counts.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Disinfectants , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination , Staphylococcus/growth & development , Bacterial Load , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Surface Properties , Time Factors
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(4): 387-390, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infection is the most common infection associated with healthcare in preterm infants. The purpose of this 18-month cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bundle applications in the prevention of umbilical venous catheter (UVC)-associated bloodstream infections. METHODS: This study included patients in whom UVCs were inserted and who were diagnosed with central line-associated bloodstream infection between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. During the second 9-month period of the study (April 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017), bundles were implemented. RESULTS: In the prebundle period, 589 patients were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 6,769 hospitalization days and 485 UVC days were recorded. Similarly, during the bundle period, 508 patients were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 7,789 hospitalization days and 508 UVC days were recorded. The UVC-associated bloodstream infection rate was 12.4 per 1,000 catheter days in the prebundle period and decreased to 3.9 per 1,000 catheter days in the bundle period. Thus, after introducing bundle applications, the rate of infection decreased by 68% (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bundle application effectively reduced UVC-associated bloodstream infection.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Sepsis/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Treatment Outcome
10.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ; 10(1): e2018055, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections results in increased health care costs and mortality. There are limited studies concerning the distribution of the etiologic agents and the resistance patterns of the microorganisms causing healthcare-associated urinary tract infections (HA-UTI) in pediatric settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of pathogens causing HA-UTI in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Isolates from 138 children with UTI who were hospitalized in pediatric, neonatal and pediatric surgery intensive care units were reviewed. RESULTS: Most common isolated organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.1%) and Escherichia coli (26.8%). Among the Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Meropenem and imipenem resistance rates were 46.2% and 38.5%. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production was present in 48 Klebsiella species (82.8%). Among ESBL positive Klebsiella species, the rate of meropenem and imipenem resistance was 18.8%, and ertapenem resistance was 45.9%. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase production was present in 27 (72.9%) Escherichia coli species. Among ESBL positive E. coli, the rate of meropenem and imipenem resistance was 7.4%, and ertapenem resistance was 14.8. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging meropenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, higher rates of ertapenem resistance in ESBL positive ones in E. coli and Klebsiella species in pediatric nosocomial UTI are important notifying signs for superbug infections.

11.
J Vasc Access ; 19(4): 358-365, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926785

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The clinical impact of central line bundle programs for central line-associated bloodstream infections has been well demonstrated in intensive care units. However, the experience of central line bundle programs in totally implantable venous access devices (ports) in pediatric-hematology patients was limited. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to compare and evaluate the clinical impact of implementing a central line bundle for a 2-year 5-month period, including 10 months of prebundle period, 11 months of central line bundle (that includes needleless split-septum devices), and finally 8 months of central line bundle period in which single-use prefilled flushing devices were added to the previous central line bundle. RESULTS: During the prebundle period, the rate of 14.5 central line-associated bloodstream infections per 1000 CL-days had decreased to 5.49 CLABSIs per 1000 CL-days in the first bundle period. The incidence rate ratio with these two groups was 0.379, indicating a relative risk reduction of 62% ( p = 0.005). By the addition of single-use prefilled flushing devices to the first bundle program, the central line-associated bloodstream infection rate decreased to 2.63 per 1000 CL-days. Port removal rate due to central line-associated bloodstream infections was 0.46 per 1000 catheter days in the bundle period, which was significantly lower than in the prebundle period in which port removal rate was 4.5 per 1000 catheter days ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Central line bundle programs were found to be effective in decreasing central line-associated bloodstream infection rates, improving patients' quality of life by preventing ports removal due in pediatric cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Central Venous Catheters , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Patient Care Bundles , Administration, Intravenous , Age Factors , Catheter-Related Infections/blood , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Device Removal , Equipment Design , Humans , Incidence , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(8): e125-8, 2016 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are among the most frequent health care-associated infections. Central line bundle (CLB) programs are useful for reducing CLABSIs. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to compare 2 periods: the prebundle and bundle periods. We evaluated the impact of a CLB including implementation of split-septum (SS) devices and single-use prefilled flushing (SUF) devices in critically ill children. RESULTS: During the prebundle period, the overall rate was 24.5 CLABSIs per 1,000 central line (CL) days, whereas after the initiation of the CLB, the CLABSIs per 1,000 CL days dropped to 14.29. In the prebundle period, the daily cost per patient with CL and CLABSI were $232.13 and $254.83 consecutively. In the bundle period, the daily cost per patient with CL and CLABSI were $226.62 and $194.28 consecutively. Compared with the period with no CLB, the CLB period, which included SUF and SS devices, resulted in more costs saving by lowering the daily total costs of patients and indirectly lowering total drug costs by decreasing antibacterial and more significantly antifungal drugs. CONCLUSIONS: CLB programs including SS and SUF devices were found to be effective in decreasing the CLABSI rate and decreasing the daily hospital costs and antimicrobial drug expenditures in children.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Patient Care Bundles/economics , Patient Care Bundles/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/economics , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/economics
13.
Turk J Pediatr ; 57(2): 161-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690597

ABSTRACT

VRE species are an increasingly important and universal problem in intensive care units and hematology-oncology departments due to the spread of glycopeptide resistance. Rapid and accurate identification of VRE is therefore crucial. The intent of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a real-time PCR test, the BD GeneOhm VanR assay (GeneXpert vanA/ vanB, Cepheid, USA), with conventional cultures for screening hospitalized immunocompromised hematology-oncology patients for VRE. Three hundred and six duplicate rectal swab specimens were obtained from 120 pediatric hematology-oncology patients. PCR and conventional culture-based studies were performed. One hundred and twenty patients, 46 female and 74 male, participated in the study. The mean age of the patients was 7.5±4.7 years. A total of 51 specimens from 306 samples were found to be positive for vanA or vanB. Mean turnaround time for PCR was 0.5±0.2 days. Compared to the culture method, the RT-PCR assay had an overall sensitivity of 91.8% (34/37) and a specificity of 93.6%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 66.6% and 98.8%, respectively. This study demonstrates that RT-PCR is a suitable alternative to culture-based procedures for rapid and accurate identification of VRE in hematology-oncology patients, as the overall performance of PCR is comparable to that of a chromogenic agar-based culture method for VRE screening, especially for detection of VRE-negative patients.


Subject(s)
Rectum/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Agar , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hematology , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infant , Male , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity
14.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 19(1): 58-61, Jan-Feb/2015. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-741233

ABSTRACT

Background: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization has been reported to increase the risk of developing infections, including bloodstream infections. Aim: In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections following gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in pediatric population during a period of 18 months. Method: A retrospective cohort of children admitted to a 400-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Izmir, Turkey whose vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was newly detected during routine surveillances for gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization during the period of January 2009 and December 2012 were included in this study. All vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates found within 18 months after initial detection were evaluated for evidence of infection. Findings: Two hundred and sixteen patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were included in the study. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was detected in 136 patients (62.3%) while they were hospitalized at intensive care units; while the remaining majority (33.0%) were hospitalized at hematology-oncology department. Vancomycinresistant enterococci bacteremia was present only in three (1.55%) patients. All these patients were immunosuppressed due to human immunodeficiency virus (one patient) and intensive chemotherapy (two patients). Conclusion: In conclusion, our study found that 1.55% of vancomycin-resistant enterococcicolonized children had developed vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infection among the pediatric intensive care unit and hematology/oncology patients; according to our findings, we suggest that immunosupression is the key point for developing vancomycinresistant enterococci bloodstream infections. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/immunology , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/immunology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/immunology , Immunocompromised Host , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
15.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 19(1): 58-61, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25529366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization has been reported to increase the risk of developing infections, including bloodstream infections. AIM: In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections following gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in pediatric population during a period of 18 months. METHOD: A retrospective cohort of children admitted to a 400-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Izmir, Turkey whose vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was newly detected during routine surveillances for gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization during the period of January 2009 and December 2012 were included in this study. All vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates found within 18 months after initial detection were evaluated for evidence of infection. FINDINGS: Two hundred and sixteen patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were included in the study. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was detected in 136 patients (62.3%) while they were hospitalized at intensive care units; while the remaining majority (33.0%) were hospitalized at hematology-oncology department. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bacteremia was present only in three (1.55%) patients. All these patients were immunosuppressed due to human immunodeficiency virus (one patient) and intensive chemotherapy (two patients). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study found that 1.55% of vancomycin-resistant enterococci-colonized children had developed vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infection among the pediatric intensive care unit and hematology/oncology patients; according to our findings, we suggest that immunosupression is the key point for developing vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Adolescent , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/immunology , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
16.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 33(7): 775-7, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24618933

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of secondary bacteremia in children with rotavirus gastroenteritis and persistence or reemergence of fever. We identified 376 children with a mean of age of 14.2 ± 10.1 months. A significant pathogen was isolated from blood cultures in 5 patients [Enterococcus faecium (n = 1), Klebsiella spp (n = 1), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1), Raoultella planticola (n = 1), Candida albicans (n = 1); 1.3%]. The frequency of secondary bacteremia in children with rotavirus gastroenteritis is low, but it should be considered when there is fever lasting >48 hours or reemergence of fever.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/pathology , Fungemia/epidemiology , Fungemia/pathology , Gastroenteritis/complications , Rotavirus Infections/complications , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood/microbiology , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Child, Preschool , Female , Fungemia/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies
17.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 19(6): 371-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23171206

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Epidemic adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis can spread rapidly among preterm infants who frequently undergo ophthalmological examination. Here we present our experience on a nosocomial outbreak that affected 8 nursery staff members and 26 premature infants. We focus on the presentation and progress of the outbreak, the diagnosis of the disease and the measures taken for its control. METHODS: Data were collected from patients' files and records of the infection control team. Conjunctival swabs were collected to perform direct fluorescent assay (DFA) and viral culture. Diagnosis was made according to clinical evidence and/or detection of the virus. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 statistical software. RESULTS: Infection was introduced to our unit after a laser photocoagulation procedure of a 28-week gestational infant and circulated rapidly within the unit due to direct transmission through contaminated medical equipment, fomites and hands of nursery staff members. Neither the patients, nor the nursery staff members developed systemic symptoms. While DFA tests were positive in seven infants, culture positivity could be demonstrated in only three infants. Contact and droplet precautions were implemented with the recommendation of the infection control team. No recurrence occurred after definition of the last case on the 32nd day. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologic procedures continue to be a potential source of adenovirus outbreaks. However, negligence of contact measures during routine daily nursing care seems to be a more important contributing factor for rapid spread. Strict adherence to appropriate aseptic procedures is required to prevent this potentially hazardous infection in preterm infants.


Subject(s)
Adenovirus Infections, Human/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Keratoconjunctivitis/epidemiology , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adenovirus Infections, Human/virology , Adenoviruses, Human/isolation & purification , Adult , Birth Weight , Conjunctiva/virology , Cross Infection/virology , Female , Gestational Age , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Keratoconjunctivitis/diagnosis , Keratoconjunctivitis/prevention & control , Keratoconjunctivitis/virology , Laser Coagulation/adverse effects , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , Turkey/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...