Effects of structured hospital-based care compared with standard care for Type 2 diabetes-The Asker and Baerum Cardiovascular Diabetes Study, a randomized trial.

AIMS: Few studies have compared structured vs. standard care on the effects of modifying several cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Because of the complexity of the disease, we hypothesized that structured care with a multi-interventional approach is necessary to effectively reach treatment goals and to reduce CV risk. METHODS: An open 2-year parallel-group study in 120 patients (age 59 +/- 10 years, 31 females) with Type 2 diabetes (median duration 4 years) was conducted. The patients were randomized to standard care (follow-up by their general practitioner) or to structured care at a hospital outpatient clinic consisting of an initial 6 months' lifestyle programme followed by targeted intensified pharmacological treatment to reach prespecified goals for glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure (BP) control. The primary outcome was change in the estimated 10-year absolute risk for fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). RESULTS: One hundred and six patients completed the study. Improvements were greater among patients receiving structured rather than standard care for systolic BP, triglycerides, glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) (P < 0.05), as well as for the estimated 10-year CHD-risk (17.9% to 14.5% vs. 18.3% to 19.6%) and the prevalence of a CHD risk >or= 20% (38% to 22% vs. 39% to 45%). Most of the reduction in estimated CHD risk (77%) in the structured care group was obtained during the period (6-24 months) with intensified pharmacological treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 2 years of structured care combining lifestyle and pharmacological interventions improved several CV risk factors and reduced the estimated 10-year absolute risk for CHD in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Inflammation and coronary angiography in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and because it is often asymptomatic and extensive in comparison with CAD in subjects without diabetes, it represents a diagnostic challenge. The objective of the study was to investigate the prevalence of CAD in asymptomatic T2DM patients utilizing angiography and to investigate its association with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, the metabolic syndrome and markers of inflammation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with T2DM without symptoms of CAD, and with >or=1 CV risk factor (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, premature familial CAD, smoking or microalbuminuria) underwent a diagnostic stress test and coronary angiography irrespective of stress test results. Stenosis detected in the main coronary arteries >or=50% of lumen diameter was categorized as one-, two- or three-vessel disease. Inflammatory markers were analysed in fasting samples. RESULTS: Fifteen men and two women had significant CAD (21%) (1-vessel disease, n=10; 2- or 3-vessel disease, n=7). Patients with 2- or 3-vessel disease were significantly older and had a longer duration of diabetes, but the prevalence of other traditional CV risk factors or the metabolic syndrome was similar among those with 1-vessel and those with 2- or 3-vessel disease. Sensitivity for CAD of the stress test was low (0.35). The mean level of the pro-inflammatory marker interleukin-6 was elevated in patients with 2- to 3-vessel CAD as compared to patients with no or 1-vessel CAD (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant CAD was found in 21% of asymptomatic patients with T2DM with >or=1 CV risk factor. Inflammatory markers may be helpful in identifying patients that are likely to have significant CAD, but larger studies are warranted.