Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arthritis Rheum ; 58(5): 1299-309, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18438830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: RANKL is essential for osteoclast development, activation, and survival. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG2 antibody that binds RANKL, inhibiting its activity. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study was to evaluate the effects of denosumab on structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving methotrexate treatment. METHODS: RA patients received subcutaneous placebo (n = 75), denosumab 60 mg (n = 71), or denosumab 180 mg (n = 72) injections every 6 months for 12 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) erosion score at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the increase in the MRI erosion score from baseline was lower in the 60-mg denosumab group (mean change 0.13; P = 0.118) and significantly lower in the 180-mg denosumab group (mean change 0.06; P = 0.007) than in the placebo group (mean change 1.75). A significant difference in the modified Sharp erosion score was observed as early as 6 months in the 180-mg denosumab group (P = 0.019) as compared with placebo, and at 12 months, both the 60-mg (P = 0.012) and the 180-mg (P = 0.007) denosumab groups were significantly different from the placebo group. Denosumab caused sustained suppression of markers of bone turnover. There was no evidence of an effect of denosumab on joint space narrowing or on measures of RA disease activity. Rates of adverse events were comparable between the denosumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of twice-yearly injections of denosumab to ongoing methotrexate treatment inhibited structural damage in patients with RA for up to 12 months, with no increase in the rates of adverse events as compared with placebo.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/metabolism , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , RANK Ligand/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Denosumab , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Time Factors
2.
Arthritis Rheum ; 56(2): 476-88, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17265483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody, over 48 weeks in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients who completed the Adalimumab Effectiveness in Psoriatic Arthritis Trial (ADEPT), a 24-week, double-blind study of adalimumab versus placebo in PsA, could elect to receive open-label adalimumab, 40 mg subcutaneously every other week after week 24. Radiographs were obtained at week 48 and were read with radiographs obtained previously. Clinical and radiographic efficacy data were analyzed overall and in patient subsets. Safety data were collected over 48 weeks. RESULTS: At week 48, patients from the adalimumab arm of ADEPT (n = 151) had achieved American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 response rates of 56%, 44%, and 30%, respectively. Among those evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (n = 69), PASI50, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 response rates (> or =50%, > or =75%, > or =90%, and 100% reduction in PASI scores, respectively) were 67%, 58%, 46%, and 33%, respectively (ACR and PASI response rates were analyzed using nonresponder imputation). Improvements in disability, as measured by the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (mean change in score -0.4) were sustained from week 24 to week 48. At week 24 and week 48, the mean changes from baseline in the modified total Sharp score were -0.1 and 0.1, respectively, for patients who received adalimumab for 48 weeks (n = 133), and 0.9 and 1.0, respectively, for patients who received placebo for 24 weeks followed by adalimumab for 24 weeks (n = 141). Adalimumab demonstrated clinical and radiographic efficacy regardless of whether patients were receiving methotrexate (MTX) at baseline. Adalimumab was generally safe and well tolerated through week 48. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab improved joint and skin manifestations, reduced disability, and inhibited radiographic progression over 48 weeks in patients with PsA who were participants in ADEPT. MTX use at baseline was not required for clinical or radiographic efficacy. Adalimumab had a good safety profile through week 48.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adalimumab , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnostic imaging , Arthrography , Disability Evaluation , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology
3.
Arthritis Rheum ; 52(10): 3279-89, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16200601

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Adalimumab, a fully human, anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for its safety and efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active PsA and a history of inadequate response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were randomized to receive 40 mg adalimumab or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 24 weeks. Study visits were at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary efficacy end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 12 and the change in the modified total Sharp score of structural damage at week 24. Secondary end points were measures of joint disease, disability, and quality of life in all patients, as well as the severity of skin disease in those patients with psoriasis involving at least 3% of body surface area. RESULTS: At week 12, 58% of the adalimumab-treated patients (87 of 151) achieved an ACR20 response, compared with 14% of the placebo-treated patients (23 of 162) (P < 0.001). At week 24, similar ACR20 response rates were maintained and the mean change in the modified total Sharp score was -0.2 in patients receiving adalimumab and 1.0 in those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). Among the 69 adalimumab-treated patients evaluated with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), 59% achieved a 75% PASI improvement response at 24 weeks, compared with 1% of the 69 placebo-treated patients evaluated (P < 0.001). Disability and quality of life measures were also significantly improved with adalimumab treatment compared with placebo. Adalimumab was generally safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab significantly improved joint and skin manifestations, inhibited structural changes on radiographs, lessened disability due to joint damage, and improved quality of life in patients with moderately to severely active PsA.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adalimumab , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Arthritis, Psoriatic/immunology , Arthritis, Psoriatic/pathology , Disability Evaluation , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Joints/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/pathology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol ; 17(3): 495-512, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12787514

ABSTRACT

Plain film radiography is the most widely used imaging technique for diagnosing and monitoring the progression of chronic inflammatory and degenerative joint diseases. Advanced imaging techniques that are better suited for detecting soft-tissue inflammation are available, but they are more costly and some of them may expose the patient to higher doses of radiation. Plain film radiographs are inexpensive, easy to generate, can be compared with baseline and prospective films, and provide a permanent, reproducible record. Radiographs can easily detect the features that are specific to various rheumatological disorders, and serial radiography can be used to assess response to therapy by measuring erosions, joint space narrowing, and other disease-specific features. This chapter discusses the use of radiography for diagnosing and differentiating various rheumatic joint diseases, specifically rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and osteoarthritis. The most frequently used scoring systems that are used to assess and monitor the severity and progression of these disorders are briefly described.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Psoriatic/classification , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Psoriatic/pathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Disease Progression , Humans , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Radiography , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...