Off-Label Use of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valves to Treat Pure Aortic Regurgitation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in native pure aortic regurgitation (AR) with off-label use of balloon-expandable valves (BEV) has been reported. However, there are scant data regarding optimal oversizing and its safety, and our study assessed BEV oversizing and outcomes of TAVI. Thirteen consecutive tricuspid aortic valve patients who underwent transfemoral TAVIs for pure AR with Sapien BEV at our center between 2019 and 2023 (69.2% males, mean age 80.8 years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons 4.0%) were divided into small annulus (SA) group (≤618 mm2) where ≥20% oversizing is achievable based on published data on BEV overexpansion, and larger annulus (LA) group (>618 mm2). Overexpansion and actual oversizing were measured on postprocedural computed tomography scan. Technical success was 92.3% with 1 valve embolization in the LA group. The postprocedural computed tomography showed a mean 28.3% oversizing, significantly higher in SA (31.2%) than in LA group (19.4%), p = 0.0092. Oversizing ≥20% was achieved in 100% SA versus 33.3% LA patients (p = 0.046). In conclusion, TAVI in pure AR with oversized Sapien BEV showed good procedural and short-term outcomes when ≥20% oversizing was predictably achievable.

A novel high-risk aortic root anatomy for right coronary artery occlusion during TAVI.

Acute coronary occlusion during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare but potentially lethal complication. Main mechanisms are sinus insufficiency or sinus sequestration with well-described risk factors. We present two cases of acute right coronary artery occlusion during TAVI with a self-expanding valve in the absence of classical risk factors and propose a novel mechanism.

Comparison of different percutaneous revascularisation timing strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients remains unknown. AIMS: We sought to compare different PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients. METHODS: The REVASC-TAVI registry is an international registry including patients undergoing TAVI with significant, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at preprocedural workup. In this analysis, patients scheduled to undergo PCI before, after or concomitantly with TAVI were included. The main endpoints were all-cause death and a composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or rehospitalisation for congestive heart failure (CHF) at 2 years. Outcomes were adjusted using the inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method. RESULTS: A total of 1,603 patients were included. PCI was performed before, after or concomitantly with TAVI in 65.6% (n=1,052), 9.8% (n=157) or 24.6% (n=394), respectively. At 2 years, all-cause death was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI (6.8% vs 20.1% vs 20.6%; p<0.001). Likewise, the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI (17.4% vs 30.4% vs 30.0%; p=0.003). Results were confirmed at landmark analyses considering events from 0 to 30 days and from 31 to 720 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and stable coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI, performance of PCI after TAVI seems to be associated with improved 2-year clinical outcomes compared with other revascularisation timing strategies. These results need to be confirmed in randomised clinical trials.

Predictors of bail-out stenting in patients with small vessel disease treated with drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown comparable results with drug-eluting stents in small vessel disease (SVD) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of target vessel revascularization and a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction. However, the relatively high rate of bail-out stenting (BOS) still represents a major drawback of DCB PCI. AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, anatomic, and procedural features predictive of BOS after DCB PCI in SVD. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients undergoing PCI at our institution between January 2020 and May 2022 who were treated with DCB PCI of a de novo lesion in a coronary vessel with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) between 2.0 and 2.5 mm. Angiographic success was defined as a residual stenosis <30% without flow-limiting dissection. Patients who did not meet these criteria underwent BOS. RESULTS: A total of 168 consecutive patients and 216 coronary stenoses were included. The rate of bail-out stent was 13.9%. On multivariate analysis, DCB/RVD ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 4.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-11.29, p < 0.01), vessel tortuosity (OR: 7.00, 95% CI: 1.66-29.62, p < 0.01), distal vessel disease (OR: 5.66, 95% CI: 2.02-15.83, p < 0.01), and high complexity (Grade C of ACC/AHA classification) coronary stenoses (OR: 6.31, 95% CI: 1.53-26.04, p = 0.01) were independent predictors of BOS. CONCLUSIONS: BOS is not an infrequent occurrence in DCB PCI of small vessels and is correlated with vessel tortuosity, distal diffuse vessel disease, higher lesion complexity, and balloon diameter oversizing.

Vascular Access in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVR: The Hostile Registry.

BACKGROUND: The optimal access route in patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains undetermined. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare clinical outcomes with transfemoral access (TFA), transthoracic access (TTA), and nonthoracic transalternative access (TAA) in TAVR patients with severe PAD. METHODS: Patients with PAD and hostile femoral access (TFA impossible, or possible only after percutaneous treatment) undergoing TAVR at 28 international centers were included in this registry. The primary endpoint was the propensity-adjusted risk of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), or main access site-related Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major vascular complications. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using a novel risk score (Hostile score). RESULTS: Among the 1,707 patients included in the registry, 518 (30.3%) underwent TAVR with TFA after percutaneous treatment, 642 (37.6%) with TTA, and 547 (32.0%) with TAA (mostly transaxillary). Compared with TTA, both TFA (adjusted HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.75) and TAA (adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) were associated with lower 30-day rates of MAE, driven by fewer access site-related complications. Composite risks at 1 year were also lower with TFA and TAA compared with TTA. TFA compared with TAA was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98), a finding confined to patients with low Hostile scores (Pinteraction = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PAD undergoing TAVR, both TFA and TAA were associated with lower 30-day and 1-year rates of MAE compared with TTA, but 1-year stroke/TIA rates were higher with TAA compared with TFA.

Coronary ectasia in different scenarios, primarily in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

AIMS: Several causes have been reported for coronary artery ectasia (CAE), mostly atherosclerosis and tunica media abnormalities. The main aim of the present study was to investigate if CAE extension differs in distinct clinical settings. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one patients with diagnosis of CAE were identified among 9659 coronary angiographies and divided into four groups according to the patient's admission diagnosis: stable or unstable angina (S-UA), myocardial infarction (MI), aortic disease, aortic valvular disease (AVD). S-UA and MI were subgrouped according to the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between clinical diagnosis and CAE extension as expressed by Markis classification and number of coronary vessels affected by CAE. RESULTS: No significant differences in CAE extension were found among the four groups, in terms of vessels affected by CAE (P = 0.37) or Markis class (P = 0.33). CAE was not related to the extension of OCAD as assessed by the Gensini score, which was higher in MI and S-UA groups (P < 0.01). However, when ischemic patients were sub-divided on the basis of the presence of OCAD, MI without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) was associated with a higher extension of CAE in terms of Markis class 1 (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.61-16.04; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The extension of CAE is comparable in patients referred to coronary angiography for different clinical scenarios, including S-UA, MI, aortic disease, and AVD; however, patients with MINOCA were associated with a higher extension of CAE.Graphical abstract: Difference in coronary artery ectasia extension in terms of Markis class severity, respectively, stratified by clinical presentation and obstructive coronary artery disease presence, http://links.lww.com/JCM/A519.

Management of Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: The best management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unclear due to the marked inconsistency of the available evidence. METHODS: The REVASC-TAVI registry (Management of Myocardial Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Coronary Artery Disease) collected data from 30 centers worldwide on patients undergoing TAVI who had significant, stable CAD at preprocedural work-up. For the purposes of this analysis, patients with either complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization were compared in a propensity score matched analysis, to take into account of baseline confounders. The primary and co-primary outcomes were all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure, respectively, at 2 years. RESULTS: Among 2407 patients enrolled, 675 pairs of patients achieving complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization were matched. The primary (21.6% versus 18.2%, hazard ratio' 0.88 [95% CI, 0.66-1.18]; P=0.38) and co-primary composite (29.0% versus 27.1%, hazard ratio' 0.97 [95% CI, 0.76-1.24]; P=0.83) outcome did not differ between patients achieving complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization, respectively. These results were consistent across different prespecified subgroups of patients (< or >75 years of age, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score > or <4%, angina at baseline, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction > or <40%, New York Heart Association class I/II or III/IV, renal failure, proximal CAD, multivessel CAD, and left main/proximal anterior descending artery CAD; all P values for interaction >0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis of the REVASC-TAVI registry showed that, among TAVI patients with significant stable CAD found during the TAVI work-up, completeness of myocardial revascularization achieved either staged or concomitantly with TAVI was similar to a strategy of incomplete revascularization in reducing the risk of all cause death, as well as the risk of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure at 2 years, regardless of the clinical and anatomical situations.

Overinflation of balloon-expandable valves for transcatheter treatment of pure noncalcified native aortic regurgitation: How much oversizing is needed and achievable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in noncalcified pure aortic valve regurgitation is challenging as dedicated valves are not widely available. We present a case series of four inoperable patients who underwent compassionate TAVI for this indication at our institution with a balloon-expandable valve. In this context, we analyzed the relevant technical aspects such as the need for larger oversizing of the transcatheter prosthesis and the safety and limits of valve overexpansion.

Sino-tubular junction to sinuses of Valsalva ratio: An echocardiographic parameter to predict coronary artery ectasia in patients with aortic enlargement.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is associated with ascending aortic (AA) ectasia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different echocardiographic parameters (EP) in predicting the presence of CAE. METHODS: Four hundred-eighteen patients with AA ectasia candidate to coronary angiography were identified and divided in two groups in respect of the presence of CAE. Receiver-operating characteristic curves areas (AUC) were used to assess the discrimination power of the following EP: aortic annulus diameter, sinuses of Valsalva (SV) diameter, sino-tubular junction (STJ) diameter, AA diameter, STJ to SV ratio (STJ-to-SV) and STJ to AA ratio (STJ-to-AA). All these parameters were indexed by body surface area. The relationship between the best EP and the presence of CAE was investigated by means of multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The rate of CAE in the study population was 32%. On univariable logistic regression, aortic annulus, STJ, STJ-to-SV and STJ-to-AA were associated with the presence of CAE after Bonferroni correction. STJ-to-SV emerged as the parameter with the best discrimination power (AUC = 0.81) compared to STJ (AUC = 0.69), STJ-to-AA (AUC = 0.68), aortic annulus (AUC = 0.59), AA (AUC = 0.56) and SV (AUC = 0.55); (p for comparison <0.01). An 89.6% value for STJ-to-SV ratio emerged as the best cut-off to diagnose CAE with a sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 82%, positive predictive value = 66% and negative predictive value = 88%. On multivariable analysis, STJ-to-SV was still associated with the presence of CAE (OR = 1.15;95%CI:1.11-1.19;p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with dilated aorta, STJ-to-SV sampled by transthoracic echocardiography shows a good diagnostic performance in predicting the presence of CAE.

How to reduce uncommon but severe transcatheter aortic valve implantation complications: stroke, thrombosis, endocarditis, cognitive decline?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become a valid alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, regardless of baseline surgical risk. The incidence of periprocedural complications has steadily declined over the years, thanks to technical advancement of transcatheter heart valves, delivery systems, and increased operators' experience. Beyond the most common periprocedural complications, there are a few uncommon but potentially severe complications that more often occur during follow-up, although they may also arise in the periprocedural phase. Stroke, infective endocarditis, valve thrombosis, and cognitive decline are among them. In this brief review, we describe the incidence, predictive factors, and potential preventive measures for those events.

[Management of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation]. / Gestione della coronaropatia asintomatica nei pazienti candidati ad impianto transcatetere di valvola aortica.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic stenosis (AS) often coexist. When significant coronary lesions were found in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, combined coronary artery bypass grafting was the gold standard of treatment. Differently, the management of concomitant CAD in patients who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a matter of debate. In this review, we discuss the evidence and present the current viewpoints regarding the definition and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI and the potential role and limitations of invasive functional coronary stenosis assessment in severe AS. We present the challenges of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this setting, including timing of intervention, completeness of revascularization in the context of the complexity of the disease and the risk associated with the PCI procedure itself. Finally, we mention ongoing trials that should provide some long-awaited answers in this field.

Impact of Elective, Uncomplicated Target Lesion Revascularization on Cardiac Mortality After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

This study sought to investigate the impact of elective, uncomplicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) on long-term cardiac mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for ULMCA disease between January 2003 and December 2015 in 1 interventional center in Northern Italy were included. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), as well as those undergoing urgent or complicated TLR were excluded. The primary endpoint of the study was cardiac mortality. Among the 418 patients fulfilling the study criteria, 79 (18.46%) underwent elective, uncomplicated TLR. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, there were 23 cardiac deaths among patients undergoing elective, uncomplicated TLR versus 50 in patients not undergoing TLR. After adjusting for possible confounders, TLR was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality (Hazard ratio [HZ] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 3.49; p = 0.03). Patients undergoing TLR had also significantly higher rates of the composite of cardiac death, MI and stroke compared with the no TLR group (adjusted HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.72). In conclusion, elective, uncomplicated TLR after PCI of ULMCA disease is associated with increased risk of long-term cardiac mortality. Reducing the risk of TLR after PCI of ULMCA disease may potentially improve the survival of these patients.

Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and long-term clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 710 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR. PPM was defined as absent if the index orifice area (iEOA) was >0.85 cm2/m2, moderate if the iEOA was between 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2 or severe if the iEOA was <0.65 cm2/m2. RESULTS: Among the 566 patients fulfilling the study criteria, the distribution of PPM was as follows: 50.5% none (n = 286), 43% moderate PPM (n = 243) and 6.5% severe PPM (n = 37). At 5-year follow-up, patients with severe PPM had a significantly higher incidence of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction and stroke (p = .025) compared with the other patients. After adjusting the results for possible confounders, severe PPM remained an independent predictor of long-term adverse outcome (HR: 2.46; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.10-5.53). The independent predictors of severe PPM were valve-in-valve procedure and body mass index. Balloon-expandable valves were not associated with higher rates of severe PPM in comparison with self-expandable valves (8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = .245). CONCLUSIONS: In our study severe PPM emerged as a risk factor for long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Predicting and improving outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults and the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are progressively extending to younger and lower risk patients. In this scenario, minimizing periprocedural complications and optimizing procedural result are both crucial to achieve an excellent long-term outcome. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the main strategies that can be adopted before, during, and after TAVR to predict and prevent complications, to optimize procedural results and ultimately improve outcomes, with an emphasis on more recent evidence, new devices, and new techniques. EXPERT OPINION: In the next future TAVR will probably represent the first treatment option for patients affected by aortic valve stenosis who are candidates to receive a biological valve. Continuous refinement of TAVR devices has been key to allow safer and most effective procedures and further progress is expected. Development of new techniques and devices, such as ultrasound-guided puncture and intravascular lithotripsy, will expand safety and eligibility to transfemoral procedures. Effective preemptive measures for coronary occlusion have been developed. Open issues include cerebral protection, re-access to coronary arteries, post-procedural management, and therapy.

Surgical Risk Scores Applied to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Friends or Foes? Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes From a Single-Center Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis. The EuroScore (ES) II, logistic EuroScore (log ES), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score are the most applied scores for surgical risk stratification. However, their predictive value for patients undergoing TAVI is still unclear. AIM: To evaluate the performance of STS, log ES and ES II as predictors of short-term and long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: Between February 2008 and October 2017, a total of 384 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI at our institution and constituted the study population. Patients were divided into three groups based on the class of risk (low, intermediate, and high) calculated by each score. In-hospital complications, 30-day outcomes, and 5-year outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 10). All scores over-estimated the risk of 30-day mortality, especially for the highest risk classes. At the end of follow-up (5 years), STS risk stratification was able to stratify all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (P<.01 and P=.02, respectively). Patients with intermediate ES II risk showed a lower survival rate (P=.04) while CV deaths did not differ between classes of risk. All-cause mortality and CV mortality curves did not diverge according to the patients' risk profiles derived from log ES. CONCLUSION: Conventional surgical risk scores are not appropriate to predict 30-day mortality in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. STS assessment was the only risk score able to stratify long-term all-cause and CV mortality.

Comparison of Routine Versus Selective Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Usage in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society).

The role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains uncertain. Previous analyses compare PPCI outcomes with clopidogrel plus GPI, versus without GPI. This does not reflect modern contemporary PPCI practice with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Nor does it answer the important question faced daily by PPCI operators: should GPI be used routinely or selectively? We aim to determine whether a strategy of routine use of GPI in contemporary PPCI practice is superior to selective GPI use. A total of 110,327 consecutive PPCIs performed in England were prospectively recorded in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database (2009 to 2015). The cohort was divided into routine and selective GPI usage groups based on the PPCI operator's strategy, defined as GPI used in >75% and <25% PPCIs, respectively. Overall, GPI use declined from 73.1% to 43.3% of PPCIs. Routine compared with selective GPI usage was associated with lower all-cause 1-year mortality: 9.7% versus 11.0%, p < 0.001. There was a consistent survival benefit for routine GPI usage as compared with selective GPI usage: univariable analysis (hazard ratio = 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.93], p < 0.001), multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 0.82 [0.77 to 0.88], p < 0.001). For survival, there was no interaction between GPI usage and the type of P2Y12-inhibitor used. In conclusion, a strategy of routine GPI usage in patients who underwent PPCI was associated with lower all-cause mortality as compared with selective GPI usage. This benefit was maintained despite 44.3% of patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor.