[Usefulness of Combining Post-processing Scatter Correction and an Anti-scatter Grid in Chest Standing Radiography].

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of combining post-processing scatter correction (IG) and an anti-scatter grid (RG) in chest radiography. METHOD: To determine the combination protocol (Hyb) that was closed to RG 12:1 (RG12), we measured the content rate of scattered radiation for each combination (RG12, IG12, RG3-12+IG3-12). Task-based modulation transfer function (MTF_Task) and SDNR were evaluated using RG12, IG12, and Hyb. Additionally, seven radiologists performed visual evaluation by using chest phantom. RESULT: The protocol of Hyb was RG8+IG3. In SDNR, Hyb (RG8+IG3) was equal to or higher than RG12, and MTF_Task was equal in all grid systems. Hyb (RG8+IG3) was significantly superior to RG12 in visual evaluation. CONCLUSION: The combining post-processing scatter correction should be useful for improving inspection throughput and reducing the risk of grid's damage.

[Examination of the Maximum Brightness of the Monitor Suitable for Radiological Technologists' Interpretation Assistance and Image Inspection].

The purpose of this study is to examine the maximum brightness of the monitor, which is suitable for radiological technologists' (hereinafter referred to as technicians) interpretation assistance and image inspection. The signal detection ability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using a chest X-ray image with a simulated nodule. In order to examine the ease of observation and the effect on the subjective evaluation by changing the maximum brightness, evaluation was performed by the normalized ranking method using chest X-ray images. ROC experiments were performed using images with and without simulated nodules in the chest phantom. There was no significant difference in detectability by changing the maximum brightness (p>0.05), but the average area under the curve (AUC) was higher at 350 cd/m2 than at 100 cd/m2 and 170 cd/m2. A normalized ranking method was performed focusing on simulated nodules on chest X-ray images. In the least significant difference (l.s.d.) method, there was a significant difference between the maximum luminance, and the higher the maximum luminance, the better the evaluation. From these results, the change in the maximum brightness did not significantly affect the signal detection ability of the technician's chest X-ray image, but the higher the maximum brightness, the easier it was to observe and the higher the subjective evaluation. It has been reported that the higher the maximum brightness, the shorter the signal recognition time, and a monitor with a high maximum brightness may lead to more efficient image inspection by a technician. From the results of this study, it is considered appropriate to use a medical liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor with a maximum brightness of 350 cd/m2 for the technician's interpretation assistance and image inspection.

[Comparison of Detectability for the New Image Processing and Conventional Image Processing by ROC Analysis: A Phantom Study of Chest Radiography].

The purpose of this study is to compare the detectability of diseases the new image processing and the conventional image processing by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and to show the usefulness of the new image processing. Radiographs with and without nodular cancer models in the chest phantom were used for observation samples. Totally 200 radiographs were evaluated by 10 radiological technologists (each readers had over 20 years or under 4 years of experience). The mean area under the curve (AUC) calculated from the over 20 years group was 0.754 for the new processing and 0.771 for the conventional processing (p value=0.651, 95% confidence interval=-0.084/0.049 (lower bound/upper bound)). On the other hand, the average AUC calculated from under 4 years group was 0.819 for the new processing and 0.678 for the conventional processing (p value= 0.041, 95% confidence interval=0.019/0.262 (lower bound/upper bound)). New image processing provides high detectability in less than 4 years group compared to conventional processing.