Hyaluronic acid prevents peripheral nerve adhesion.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the prevention of scar formation after neurolysis using a rabbit model. In the first stage, the left sciatic nerve was exposed and elevated along a 3 cm section. Then, the surface of the neural bed was coagulated using a bipolar coagulator. Finally, the sciatic nerve was replaced and fixed to the neural bed with 8/0 nylon sutures, and the wound was closed. In the second stage, the adherent sciatic nerve was re-exposed after 6 weeks. In the neurolysis group, a simple neurolysis was performed. In the HA group, the neurolysis was performed in a surgical field coated with HA from the beginning to the end of the operation. In the steroid group, methyl prednisolone acetate was infiltrated at the end of the neurolysis. In the third stage, electrophysiological, histological and biomechanical measurements were taken 6 weeks after the second stage. While there was no significant difference between the HA and the steroid groups, the electrophysiological functions of the HA and steroid groups were significantly better than that of the neurolysis group. Histology showed that the formation of intraneural and extraneural scar tissue was lowest in the HA group, followed by the steroid and neurolysis groups. The tensile strength required to strip the sciatic nerve from the neural bed of the HA group was significantly less than that of the neurolysis group. However, there was no significant difference between the steroid and neurolysis groups. In conclusion, HA effectively reduced scar formation after neurolysis.

Lumbar paraspinal myonecrosis after abdominal vascular surgery: a case report.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVES: Lumbar paraspinal myonecrosis after abdominal vascular surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar paraspinal myonecrosis does not appear to have been reported previously. METHODS: A patient who had severe back pain after abdominal vascular surgery was observed with computed tomographic scans and histologic examination of a specimen obtained in open biopsy. RESULTS: Computed tomographic scans of the lumbar region demonstrated muscle swelling of the unilateral paraspinal compartment. Histologic examinations of affected muscle revealed fresh ischemic necrosis. A compartmental syndrome was considered from the patient's clinical presentation and radiographic and histologic features. An accompanying secondary infection led to an extensive abscess in the paraspinal compartment. The patient resumed active daily life after aggressive débridements of infected and necrotic muscles. CONCLUSIONS: A compartmental syndrome in the paraspinal muscle should be kept in mind as a potential cause of acute back pain especially after abdominal vascular surgery.