Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 37(3): 506-510, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is often performed by ophthalmology trainees without direct supervision. The traditional model of 'see one, do one, teach one' still prevails in most units. Whilst it is generally a safe procedure, damage to the temporal branch of the facial nerve has been reported when harvesting the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery. METHODS: A survey of trainees from Wessex, Wales, London and Severn deaneries was performed to look at current training techniques, anatomical knowledge and practice. RESULTS: 38 trainees responded to the survey, with complete responses from 28 participants. Formal teaching of the anatomical considerations in TAB was not reported by any trainee, with informal teaching being standard practice. Whilst 61% of respondents reported having learnt about the anatomical 'danger zone' for facial nerve damage, 97% of trainees chose an incision that fell within this zone when given a choice between potential incision sites. CONCLUSION: TAB remains a largely trainee-taught, trainee-performed procedure. Most trainees are not aware of how to avoid the risk of damage to the temporal branch of the facial nerve. We suggest harvesting the parietal branch of the temporal artery via an incision outside the anatomical 'danger zone'. In our experience, this is an easily taught technique that minimises the potential risk of damage to the frontal branch of the facial nerve.


Subject(s)
Surgical Wound , Temporal Arteries , Humans , Temporal Arteries/pathology , Facial Nerve , Biopsy/methods , Surgical Wound/pathology , London
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...