Comparable dose estimates of blinded whole blood samples are obtained independently of culture conditions and analytical approaches. Second RENEB gene expression study.

PURPOSE: This collaboration of five established European gene expression labs investigated the potential impact of culture conditions on the transcriptional response of peripheral blood to radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from one healthy donor was exposed ex vivo to a Cobalt 60 source to produce a calibration curve in addition to four unknown doses. After exposure, the blood samples were either diluted with RPMI medium or left untouched. After 24-h incubation at 37 °C the diluted blood samples were lysed, while the undiluted samples were mixed with the preservative RNALater and all samples were shipped frozen to the participating labs. Samples were processed by each lab using microarray (one lab) and QRT-PCR (four labs). RESULTS: We show that although culture conditions affect the total amount of RNA recovered (p < .0001) and its integrity (p < .0001), it does not significantly affect dose estimates (except for the true dose at 1.1 Gy). Most importantly, the different analysis approaches provide comparable mean absolute difference of estimated doses relative to the true doses (p = .9) and number of out of range (>0.5 Gy) measurements (p = .6). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the robustness of gene expression as a method for biological dosimetry.

Chromosome aberrations induced by the Auger electron emitter (125)I.

DNA-associated Auger electron emitters (AEE) cause cellular damage leading to high-LET type cell survival curves indicating an enhanced relative biological effectiveness. Double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by Iodine-125-deoxyuridine ((125)I-UdR) decays are claimed to be very complex. To elucidate the assumed genotoxic potential of (125)I-UdR, chromatid aberrations were analysed in exposed human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). PBL were stimulated with medium containing phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). After 24h, cultures were labelled with (125)I-UdR for 18h (activity concentration 1-45 kBq) during the S-phase. Following standard cytogenetic procedure, at least 100 metaphases were analysed microscopically for each activity concentration. Cell death was measured by apoptosis assay using flow cytometry. Radiation doses were determined by using point kernel calculations. After 18h labelling with (125)I-UdR the cell cycle distribution is severely disturbed. About 40% of PBL are fully labelled and 20% show a moderate labelling of (125)I-UdR, whereas 40% of cells remain un-labelled. The dose-response relationship fits to a polynomial curve in the low dose range, whereas a linear fit supplies a better estimation in the high dose range. Even the lowest dose of 0.2Gy leads to a 13-fold increase of aberrations compared to the controls. On average every fifth (125)I-decay produces a single chromatid aberration in PBL. Additionally, a dose-dependent increase of cell death is observed. (125)I-UdR has a very strong genotoxic capacity in human PBL, even at 0.2Gy. Efficiently labelled cells displaying a prolonged cell cycle compared to moderately labelled cells and cell death contribute substantially to the desynchronisation of the cell cycle. Our data, showing for the first time, that one (125)I-decay induces ∼ 0.2 chromatid aberrations, are in very good accordance to DSB data, stating that ∼0.26 DSB are induced per decay, indicating that it takes on average 250 decays to induce one chromosome aberration (CA). [Corrected]