"I do not know the advantages of having a general practitioner" - a qualitative study exploring the views of low-acuity emergency patients without a regular general practitioner toward primary care.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (ED) worldwide have to cope with rising patient numbers. Low-acuity consulters who could receive a more suitable treatment in primary care (PC) increase caseloads, and lack of PC attachment has been discussed as a determinant. This qualitative study explores factors that contribute to non-utilization of general practitioner (GP) care among patients with no current attachment to a GP. METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 32 low-acuity ED consulters with no self-reported attachment to a GP. Participants were recruited from three EDs in the city center of Berlin, Germany. Data were analyzed by qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Interviewed patients reported heterogeneous factors contributing to their PC utilization behavior and underlying views and experiences. Participants most prominently voiced a rare need for medical services, a distinct mobility behavior, and a lack of knowledge about the role of a GP and health care options. Views about and experiences with GP care that contribute to non-utilization were predominantly related to little confidence in GP care, preference for directly consulting medical specialists, and negative experiences with GP care in the past. Contrasting their reported utilization behavior, many interviewees still recognized the advantages of GP care continuity. CONCLUSION: Understanding reasons of low-acuity ED patients for GP non-utilization can play an important role in the design and implementation of patient-centered care interventions for PC integration. Increasing GP utilization, continuity of care and health literacy might have positive effects on patient decision-making in acute situations and in turn decrease ED burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00023480; date: 2020/11/27.

[Redirection of patients from the emergency department to ambulatory care: a feasibility study]. / Steuerung von Patient*innen aus Notaufnahmen in die vertragsärztliche Versorgung: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie.

BACKGROUND: § 120 para. 3b SGB V mandates the Federal Joint Committee to define guidelines for the initial assessment of self-referred walk-in patients as well as for the redirection of patients who can be treated by office-based physicians. A corresponding streaming and redirection process was tested in a feasibility study at the RoMed Clinic Rosenheim. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the duration of the study, triage nurses of the emergency department (ED) first assessed self-referred walk-in patients with the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Patients in categories green and blue who did not obviously need the ED's resources were additionally assessed by health professionals of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Bavaria using the software Structured Initial Medical Assessment in Germany (SmED). Patients with a recommendation for non-hospital medical treatment were streamed to the out-of-hours practice on campus or were redirected to a physician office after video consultation with an office-based physician. Patient pathways were documented and a qualitative survey using semistructured guided interviews of all stakeholder groups was carried out. RESULTS: 1,091 self-referred walk-in patients were included. Direct streaming to the ED occurred in 525 cases,13 refused to participate. Based on SmED, 24 additional patients were referred to the ED, 514 patients were streamed to the out-of-hours practice, 23 received a video consultation and five left the ED. After video consultation, eight patients were redirected to a physician's office, 10 were discharged, and five referred to the ED of which one did not want an office-based physician. No returnees from practices to the ED were identified. Generally, the redirection process was evaluated positively in the interviews (n=18). In particular, potential for technical improvement was identified. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of the redirection process and high acceptance levels. Using SmED in addition to MTS appeared useful before redirection but not necessary for streaming on campus. Redirection to physician offices can help reduce strain on the ED when the out-of-hours practice is not operating. In addition to arranging acute care appointments, video consultations offer an additional potential to treat patients. In a follow-up study, a broader range of patients should be included and appropriateness of redirection decisions should be evaluated.

Exploring the views of low-acuity emergency department consulters on an educational intervention and general practitioner appointment service: a qualitative study in Berlin, Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Low-acuity patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) frequently have unmet ambulatory care needs. This qualitative study explores the patients' views of an intervention aimed at education about care options and promoting primary care (PC) attachment. DESIGN: Qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants of an interventional pilot study, based on a semi-structured interview guide. The data were analysed through qualitative content analysis. SETTING: The study was carried out in three EDs in the city centre of Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two low-acuity ED consulters with no connection to a general practitioner (GP) who had participated in the pilot study were interviewed; (f/m: 15/17; mean age: 32.9 years). INTERVENTION: In the pilot intervention, ED patients with low-acuity complaints were provided with an information leaflet on appropriate ED usage and alternative care paths and they were offered an optional GP appointment scheduling service. Qualitative interviews explored the views of a subsample of the participants on the intervention. RESULTS: Interviewees perceived both parts of the intervention as valuable. Receiving a leaflet about appropriate ED use and alternatives to the ED was viewed as helpful, with participants expressing the desire for additional online information and a wider distribution of the content. The GP appointment service was positively assessed by the participants who had made use of this offer and seen as potentially helpful in establishing a long-term connection to GP care. The majority of patients declining a scheduled GP appointment expected no personal need for further medical care in the near future or preferred to choose a GP independently. CONCLUSIONS: Low-acuity ED patients seem receptive to information on alternative acute care options and prevailingly appreciate measures to encourage and facilitate attachment to a GP. Promoting PC integration could contribute to a change in future usage behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00023480.

Redirecting emergency medical services patients with unmet primary care needs: the perspective of paramedics on feasibility and acceptance of an alternative care path in a qualitative investigation from Berlin, Germany.

BACKGROUND: Against the backdrop of emergency department (ED) overcrowding, patients' potential redirection to outpatient care structures is a subject of current political debate in Germany. It was suggested in this context that suitable lower-urgency cases could be transported directly to primary care practices by emergency medical services (EMS), thus bypassing the ED. However, practicality is discussed controversially. This qualitative study aimed to capture the perspective of EMS personnel on potential patient redirection concepts. METHODS: We conducted qualitative, semi-structured phone interviews with 24 paramedics. Interviews were concluded after attainment of thematic saturation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Technical and organizational feasibility of patients' redirection was predominantly seen as limited (theme: "feasible, but only under certain conditions") or even impossible (theme: "actually not feasible"), based on a wide spectrum of potential barriers. Prominently voiced reasons were restrictions in personnel resources in both EMS and ambulatory care, as well as concerns for patient safety ascribed to a restricted diagnostic scope. Concerning logistics, alternative transport options were assessed as preferable. Regarding acceptance by stakeholders, the potential for releasing ED caseload was described as a factor potentially promoting adoption, while doubt was raised regarding acceptance by EMS personnel, as their workload was expected to conversely increase. Paramedics predominantly did not consider transporting lower-urgency cases as their responsibility, or even as necessary. Participants were markedly concerned of EMS being misused for taxi services in this context and worried about negative impact for critically ill patients, as to vehicles and personnel being potentially tied up in unnecessary transports. As to acceptance on the patients' side, interview participants surmised a potential openness to redirection if this would be associated with benefits like shorter wait times and accompanied by proper explanation. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews with EMS staff highlighted considerable doubts about the general possibility of a direct redirection to primary care as to considerable logistic challenges in a situation of strained EMS resources, as well as patient safety concerns. Plans for redirection schemes should consider paramedics' perspective and ensure a provision of EMS with the resources required to function in a changing care environment.

Emergency Departments as Care Providers for Patients with Cardiac Ambulatory Care Sensitive and Mental Health Conditions: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study with Patients and Physicians.

Mental health conditions are frequent among patients with somatic illnesses, such as cardiac diseases. They often remain undiagnosed and are related to increased utilization of outpatient services, including emergency department care. The objective of this qualitative study was to investigate the significance of the emergency department in the patients' course of treatment and from the physicians' perspective. An improved understanding of the subjective needs of this specific patient group should provide hints for targeted treatment. This study is part of the prospective EMASPOT study, which determined the prevalence of mental health conditions in emergency department patients with cardiac ambulatory care sensitive conditions. The study on hand is the qualitative part, in which 20 semi-structured interviews with patients and a focus group with six ED physicians were conducted. Data material was analyzed using the qualitative content analysis technique, a research method for systematically identifying themes or patterns. For interpretation, we used the "typical case approach". We identified five "typical patient cases" that differ in their cardiac and mental health burden of disease, frequency and significance of emergency department and outpatient care visits: (1) frequent emergency department users with cardiac diseases and mental health conditions, (2) frequent emergency department users without cardiac diseases but with mental health conditions, (3) needs-based emergency department users with cardiac diseases; (4) targeted emergency department users as an alternative to specialist care and (5) patients surprised by initial diagnose of cardiac disease in the emergency department. While patients often perceived the emergency department visit itself as a therapeutic benefit, emergency department physicians emphasized that frequent examinations of somatic complaints can worsen mental health conditions. To improve care, they proposed close cooperation with the patients' primary care providers, access to patients' medical data and early identification of mental health conditions after cardiac diagnoses, e.g., by an examination tool.

Emergency department consultations for respiratory symptoms revisited: exploratory investigation of longitudinal trends in patients' perspective on care, health care utilization, and general and mental health, from a multicenter study in Berlin, Germany.

BACKGROUND: Only few studies of emergency department (ED) consulters include a longitudinal investigation. The EMACROSS study had surveyed 472 respiratory patients in eight inner-city EDs in Berlin in 2017/2018 for demographic, medical and consultation-related characteristics. This paper presents the results of a follow-up survey at a median of 95 days post-discharge. We aimed to explore the post hoc assessment of ED care and identify potential longitudinal trends. METHODS: The follow-up survey included items on satisfaction with care received, benefit from the ED visit, potential alternative care, health care utilization, mental and general health, and general life satisfaction. Univariable between-subject and within-subject statistical comparisons were conducted. Logistic regression was performed for multivariable investigations of determinants of dropout and of retrospectively rating the ED visit as beneficial. RESULTS: Follow-up data was available for 329 patients. Participants of lower education status, migrants, and tourists were more likely to drop out. Having a general practitioner (GP), multimorbidity, and higher general life satisfaction were determinants of response. Retrospective satisfaction ratings were high with no marked longitudinal changes and waiting times as the most frequent reason for dissatisfaction. Retrospective assessment of the visit as beneficial was positively associated with male sex, diagnoses of pneumonia and respiratory failure, and self-referral. Concerning primary care as a viable alternative, judgment at the time of the ED visit and at follow-up did not differ significantly. Health care utilization post-discharge increased for GPs and pulmonologists. Self-reported general health and PHQ-4 anxiety scores were significantly improved at follow-up, while general life satisfaction for the overall sample was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients retrospectively assess the ED visit as satisfactory and beneficial. Possible sex differences in perception of care and its outcomes should be further investigated. Conceivable efforts at diversion of ED utilizers to primary care should consider patients' views regarding acceptable alternatives, which appear relatively independent of situational factors. Representativeness of results is restricted by the study focus on respiratory symptoms, the limited sample size, and the attrition rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00011930 ); date: 2017/04/25.

[Am I an emergency patient? Emergency perception and decision-making competence in acute situations: a qualitative study of ED patients]. / Bin ich ein Notfall? Notfallempfinden und Entscheidungskompetenz in akuten Situationen: eine qualitative Erhebung bei Notaufnahmepatient*innen.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients visiting emergency departments (ED) due to acute but less than urgent treatment needs is increasing. A deeper understanding of emergency perception and decision-making competencies of patients is fundamentally important for developing strategies to reduce ED utilization. The aim of this study was to assess ED patients' subjective understanding of an emergency in general as well as relating to their own specific consultation. Additionally, the patients' perspective on the ability to make appropriate decisions in acute situations should be explored. METHODS: Seventeen qualitative semi-structured patient interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The majority of participants attributed their ED consultation to a subjectively perceived emergency situation. Interviewees mostly understood an emergency as a serious or life-threatening constellation associated with impending long-term health damage. They believed that uncertainty concerning the interpretation of their symptoms and associated anxiety may particularly promote situations in which referring to an ED appears to be the only alternative. Patients' health competencies were assessed negatively by a majority of interviewees with regard to assessment of complaints and decision-making in acute situations ("insecure patients"). In contrast, few patients, including those with chronic disease and experience in dealing with health problems, were considered to have a high level of competence ("confident patients"). CONCLUSION: Improving patients' health literacy skills to strengthen their assessment of acute situations and their decision-making is important in order to promote appropriate ED utilization.

Diverting less urgent utilizers of emergency medical services to primary care: is it feasible? Patient and morbidity characteristics from a cross-sectional multicenter study of self-referring respiratory emergency department consulters.

OBJECTIVE: Diversion of less urgent emergency medical services (EMS) callers to alternative primary care (PC) is much debated. Using data from the EMACROSS survey of respiratory ED patients, we aimed to characterize self-referred EMS patients, compare these with non-EMS patients, and assess scope and acceptability of a potential redirection to alternative PC. RESULTS: Of n = 292 self-referred patients, n = 99 were transported by EMS. Compared to non-EMS patients, these were older, triaged more urgently and arrived out-of-hours more frequently. The share of chronically and severely ill patients was greater. Out-of-hours ED visit, presence of a chronic pulmonary condition as well as a hospital diagnosis of respiratory failure were identified as determinants of EMS utilization in a logistic model, while consultation for access and quality motives as well as migrant status decreased the probability. EMS-transported lower urgency outpatients visiting during regular physicians' hours were defined as potential PC cases and evaluated descriptively (n = 9). As a third was medically complex and potentially less suitable for PC, redirection potential could be estimated at only 6% of EMS cases. This would be reduced to 2% if considering patients' judgment concerning the appropriate setting. Overall, the scope for PC diversion of respiratory EMS patients seems limited.

Self-referred walk-in patients in the emergency department - who and why? Consultation determinants in a multicenter study of respiratory patients in Berlin, Germany.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) consultations are on the rise, and frequently consultations by non-urgent patients have been held accountable. Self-referred walk-in (SRW) consulters supposedly represent a predominantly less urgent patient population. The EMACROSS study aimed to explore consultation determinants and motives in SRW patients with respiratory symptoms. METHODS: Multicenter survey of adult ED patients with respiratory complaints in eight emergency departments in central Berlin, Germany. Secondary hospital records data including diagnoses was additionally assessed. Characteristics of SRW and non-SRW patients were compared. Determinants of SRW consultation were evaluated by binary logistic regression. Consultation motives were analyzed descriptively. As a supplemental approach, network analysis (lasso-regularized mixed graphical model) was performed to explore connections between consultation determinants, consultation features and motives. RESULTS: Between June 2017 and November 2018, n = 472 participants were included, the median age was 55 years (range 18-96), 53.2% of patients were male and n = 185 cases (39.2%) were SRW consulters. The SRW group showed lower proportions of potentially severe (pneumonia and respiratory failure, p < 0.001, χ2 test) and chronic pulmonary conditions. Determinants of SRW consultation identified by logistic regression were younger age (p < 0.001), tertiary education (p = 0.032), being a first-generation migrant (p = 0.002) or tourist (p = 0.008), having no regular primary care provider (p = 0.036) and no chronic pulmonary illness (p = 0.017). The area under the curve (AUC) for the model was 0.79. Personal distress and access problems in ambulatory care were stated most frequently as consultation motives in the SRW group; network analysis showed the scarcity of associations between demographic and medical SRW determinants and motives triggering the actual decision to consult. CONCLUSIONS: As to "who" consults, this study identified demographic and medical predictors of SRW utilization. The said markers seem only remotely connected to "why" people decide for SRW visits. To alleviate ED crowding by addressing frequent SRW consultation motives, interventions focused on the ability for symptom self-assessment and at better-accessible alternative care seem sensible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00011930 ); date: 2017/04/25.

What role does the GP play for emergency department utilizers? A qualitative exploration of respiratory patients' perspectives in Berlin, Germany.

BACKGROUND: While motives for emergency department (ED) self-referrals have been investigated in a number of studies, the relevance of general practitioner (GP) care for these patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. Respiratory symptoms constitute an important utilization trigger in both EDs and in primary care. In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore the role of GP care for patients visiting EDs as outpatients for respiratory complaints and the relevance of the relationship between patient and GP in the decision making process leading up to an ED visit. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with a sample of 17 respiratory ED patients in Berlin, Germany. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was performed. The study was embedded into the EMACROSS (Emergency and Acute Care for Respiratory Diseases beyond Sectoral Separation) cohort of ED patients with respiratory symptoms, which is part of EMANet (Emergency and Acute Medicine Network for Health Care Research). RESULTS: Three patterns of GP utilization could be differentiated: long-term regular consulters, sporadic consulters and patients without GP. In sporadic consulters and patients without GP, an ambivalent or even aversive view of GP care was prevalent, with lack of confidence in GPs' competence and a deficit in trust as seemingly relevant influencing factors. Regardless of utilization or relationship type, patients frequently made contact with a GP before visiting an ED. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to respiratory symptoms, our qualitative data suggest a hypothesis of limited relevance of patients' primary care utilization pattern and GP-patient relationship for ED consultation decisions.

How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs' view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute symptoms present not only to general practitioners (GPs), but also frequently to emergency departments (EDs). Patients' decision processes leading up to an ED self-referral are complex and supposed to result from a multitude of determinants. While they are key providers in primary care, little is known about GPs' perception of such patients. This qualitative study explores the GPs' view regarding motives and competences of patients self-referring to EDs, and also GPs' rationale for or against physician-initiated ED referrals. DESIGN: Qualitative study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; qualitative content analysis. SETTING: GP practices in Berlin, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 15 GPs (female/male: 9/6; mean age 53.6 years). RESULTS: The interviewed GPs related a wide spectrum of factors potentially influencing their patients' decision to visit an ED, and also their own decision-making in potential referrals. Considerations go beyond medical urgency. Statements concerning patients' surmised rationale corresponded to GPs' reasoning in a variety of important areas. For one thing, the timely availability of an extended spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options may make ED services attractive to both. Access difficulties in the ambulatory setting were mentioned as additional triggers for an ED visit initiated by a patient or a GP. Key patient factors like severity of symptoms and anxiety also play a major role; a desire for reassurance may lead to both self-referred and physician-initiated ED visits. Patients' health competence was prevailingly depicted as limited, with the internet as an important influencing factor. Counselling efforts by GP were described as crucial for improving health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Health education could hold promise when aiming to reduce non-urgent ED consultations. Primary care providers are in a key position here. Amelioration of organisational shortages in ambulatory care, for example, limited consultation hours, might also make an important impact, as these trigger both self-referrals and GP-initiated ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011930.