Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 2021 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34411630

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maintaining normocapnia during mechanical ventilation in anesthetized children during laparoscopic surgeries is highly recommended. There is a debate regarding the use of capnography (ETCO2) as a trend monitor for evaluation of arterial carbon dioxide levels (PaCO2). We analyzed the relationship between ETCO2 and PaCO2 with time in elective pediatric laparoscopic surgeries. METHODS: This study was a prospective observational cohort analysis of 116 paired comparisons between PaCO2 and ETCO2 computed from 29 children (ASA I, 12-72 months). Arterial blood samples were withdrawn before, at 15 minutes and 30 minutes during pneumoperitoneum and 1 minute after deflation. ETCO2 value was recorded simultaneously, while arterial blood was withdrawn. PaCO2-ETCO2 relationship was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland Altman Method of agreement. RESULTS: Out of the 116 comparisons analyzed, a PaCO2-ETCO2 difference beyond 0 to ≤ 5 mmHg was recorded in 71 comparisons (61.2%) with negative difference in 34 comparisons (29.3%). A positive significant correlation between PaCO2 and ETCO2 was recorded before (r = 0.617, p = 0.000) and at 15 minutes (r = 0.582, p = 0.001), with no significant correlation at 30 minutes (r = 0.142, p = 0.461), either after deflation (r = 0.108, p = 0.577). Bland-Altman plots showed agreement between ETCO2 and PaCO2 before inflation with mean PaCO2-ETCO2 difference 0.14 ± 5.6 mmHg (limits of 95% agreement -10.84-11.2, simple linear regression testing p-value 0.971), with no agreement at 15 minutes (0.51 ± 7.15, -13.5-14.5, p = 0.000), 30 minutes. (2.62 ± 7.83, -12.73-17.97, p = 0.000), or after deflation (1.81 ± 6.56, -10.93-14.55, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Usage of capnography as a trend monitor in pediatric laparoscopic surgeries may not be a reliable surrogate for PaCO2 levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials. gov (Identifier: NCT03361657).

2.
Pain Physician ; 19(4): 243-53, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27228512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimum dose of dexmedetomidine for shivering control with the least hemodynamic derangements is still under research. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, hemodynamic and side effects of dexmedetomidine in 3 different doses with those of meperidine for the treatment of shivering in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for minor elective lower abdominal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective double-blind randomized clinically controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients who developed shivering under spinal anesthesia.On shivering, patients were randomly allocated to receive an intravenous 2 mL bolus dose of meperidine 0.4 mg/kg (meperidine group, n = 30), dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg (DEX I group, n = 30), 0.3 µg/kg (DEX II group, n = 30), or 0.2µg/kg (DEX III group, n = 30). Control of shivering, time taken for cessation of shivering, response rate, recurrence, hemodynamic changes, sedation score, tympanic temperature, and side effects were noted and compared between groups. RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding demographic profile, tympanic temperature decline, and shivering onset time (P > 0.05). Lower shivering cessation time (P < 0.001) and higher response rate (P < 0.01) were observed in DEX I and II groups compared with DEX III and meperidine groups, with a nonsignificant difference between DEX I and II groups. Recurrence of shivering activity was higher in DEX III group (36.7%, P < 0.01) compared with DEX I (10%), DEX II (6.7%) and meperidine (16.7%) groups. Lower heart rates, systolic and diastolic blood pressure mean values were recorded in DEX I group (P < 0.05). Nine patients (30%) in DEX I group were in levels 3 - 5 of sedation (P < 0.02) compared with 5 (16.66%), 2 (6.66%), and 4 (13.3) patients in DEX II, DEX III, and meperidine groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Among the 3 doses investigated, dexmedetomidine 0.3µg/kg effectively treated shivering associated with spinal anesthesia with modest hemodynamic and sedation effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02382432. KEY WORDS: Dexmedetomidine, hypothermia, shivering, spinal anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Meperidine/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Shivering/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Meperidine/administration & dosage , Meperidine/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...