Novel Regional Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty Promote Reduced Hospital Length of Stay: An Analysis of 106 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Novel regional techniques, including the adductor canal block (ACB) and the local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, provide an alternative approach for controlling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared 3 regional techniques (femoral nerve catheter [FNC] block alone, FNC block with IPACK, and ACB with IPACK) on pain scores, opioid consumption, performance during physical therapy, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: All patients had a continuous perineural infusion, either FNC block or ACB. Patients in the IPACK block groups also received a single injection 30-mL IPACK block of 0.25% ropivacaine. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8-hour intervals for 48 hours. Physical therapy performance was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2, and hospital length of stay was recorded. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the 3 groups with regard to baseline patient demographics. Although we observed no differences in pain scores between the 3 groups, opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the FNC with IPACK group. Physical therapy performance was significantly better on POD 1 in the ACB with IPACK group compared to the other 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ACB with IPACK group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an IPACK block reduced opioid consumption by providing effective supplemental analgesia following TKA compared to the FNC-only technique. ACB with IPACK provided equivalent analgesia and improved physical therapy performance, allowing earlier hospital discharge.

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve blockade in the severely and morbidly obese: a prospective and randomized study.

PURPOSE: Limited research data exist regarding optimal block techniques in the severely and morbidly obese patient population. We compared two approaches to sciatic nerve blockade at the popliteal fossa in severely and morbidly obese patients. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in pain scores, block onset characteristics, and adverse events between the proximal (prebifurcation) and the distal (postbifurcation) sites. METHODS: Patients with a body mass index ≥35 scheduled for unilateral foot surgery with a popliteal block were randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided popliteal block proximal or distal to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. The primary endpoint was numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in each group for a total of 60 participants. Patients in the distal group had lower NRS scores upon entry into the PACU (0.70 ± 1.91) compared with the proximal group (2.17 ± 3.37), had a faster onset of sensorimotor blockade, and were less likely to require a repeat block procedure, conversion to general anesthesia, or local anesthetic supplementation by the surgical team. There was no difference in block procedure times or incidence of nerve injury between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The distal approach to the popliteal block provided several intraoperative and analgesic benefits without a difference in block procedural times in the severely and morbidly obese. It is a cost-free intervention that results in a higher likelihood of a successful block in a population where avoidance of opioids is desirable.

The adductor canal block provides effective analgesia similar to a femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty--a retrospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of an ultrasound-guided single-shot adductor canal block to provide adequate analgesia and improve performance during physical therapy. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: All procedures were performed at Ochsner Medical Center. MEASUREMENTS: Patient demographics as well as the type of peripheral nerve block performed. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8 ± 3, 16 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 hours. In addition, physical therapy performance was analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pain scores or cumulative hydromorphone requirements between the adductor canal block group and the femoral nerve block group at any of the time points analyzed. Gait distance measured during physical therapy sessions in the adductor canal block group was superior compared with the femoral nerve block group. CONCLUSION: Within the first 24 hours, a single-shot adductor canal block provides equally effective analgesia when compared with a femoral nerve block and improves postoperative physical therapy performance.

Bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome following right total knee revision: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Gluteal compartment syndrome is a rare occurrence traditionally found in settings of extended immobilization. Thrombolytics and medications with myositis as a potential side effect have also been implicated in a few isolated cases of spontaneous compartment syndrome. Early signs are pain on passive stretching and pain out of proportion to physical examination findings. Failure to recognize and definitively treat compartment syndrome within the first 24 to 36 hours can lead to permanent limb loss and morbidity from a host of systemic complications such as hyperkalemia, renal failure, and sepsis. CASE REPORT: We report a case of bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome in a 52-year-old patient following a right total knee revision. On postoperative day 2, physical examination after the patient became agitated and in severe distress from bilateral buttock pain showed that the right and left gluteal regions were tense, hard, and erythematous. Creatinine phosphokinase and liver function tests were significantly elevated. Following emergency fasciotomy, physicians thoroughly reviewed the operative course, medication history, and imaging studies. We withdrew simvastatin, a medication associated with spontaneous compartment syndrome, from our patient's daily medications. By day of discharge, both creatinine phosphokinase and liver function problems were decreasing, and the gluteal pain had significantly resolved. The etiology of bilateral gluteal compartment syndrome in our patient could have been a combination of intraoperative length and positioning with simvastatin-induced myositis. Obesity presented an additional risk factor. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of identifying patients at increased risk of compartment syndrome in the preoperative assessment and following them with more intensive intraoperative and postoperative monitoring.

Comparison of ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques for interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery in a residency training environment: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: The ability to provide adequate intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for orthopedic shoulder surgery continues to be a procedural challenge. Anesthesiology training programs constantly balance the time needed for procedural education versus associated costs. The administration of brachial plexus anesthesia can be facilitated through nerve stimulation or by ultrasound guidance. The benefits of using a nerve stimulator include a high incidence of success and less cost when compared to ultrasonography. Recent studies with ultrasonography suggest high success rates and decreased procedural times, but less is known about the comparison of these procedural times in training programs. We conducted a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study with inexperienced clinical anesthesia (CA) residents-CA-1 to CA-3-to compare differences in these 2 guidance techniques in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for orthopedic surgery. METHODS: In this study, 41 patients scheduled for orthopedic shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to receive an interscalene brachial plexus block guided by either ultrasound (US group) or nerve stimulation (NS group). Preoperative analgesics and sedatives were controlled in both groups. RESULTS: The US group required significantly less time to conduct the block (4.3 ± 1.5 minutes) than the NS group (10 ± 1.5 minutes), P â€Š=  .009. Moreover, the US group achieved a significantly faster onset of sensory block (US group, 12 ± 2 minutes; NS group, 19 ± 2 minutes; P â€Š=  .02) and motor block (US group, 13.5 ± 2.3 minutes; NS group, 20.2 ± 2.1 minutes; P â€Š=  .03). Success rates were high for both techniques and were not statistically different (US group, 95%; NS group, 91%). No differences were found in operative times, postoperative pain scores, need for rescue analgesics, or incidences of perioperative or postdischarge side effects. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results with inexperienced residents, we found that using US in guiding the interscalene approach to the brachial plexus significantly shortened the duration of intervals in conduction of the block and onset of anesthesia when compared with NS; moreover, these times could have significant cost savings for the institution. Finally, the use of US technology in an academic medical center facilitates safe, cost-effective, quality care.

Orthopedic anesthesia in haiti.

Healthcare practitioners from around the world responded almost immediately in the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. This article reports on the efforts of an orthopedic trauma team in Haiti and its efforts in providing surgery without general anesthesia.