A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.

Portal films are an important tool for verification of the shaping and positioning of external radiation fields to the target volume in radiotherapy. One limitation of port films is their inherent lack of contrast, which is due to the low attenuation of the exposing megavoltage radiation by the tissues being imaged. Recently, Kodak introduced a new portal film-cassette system, Kodak EC-L, with much improved contrast compared with conventional film. The aim of this study was to determine if the enhanced contrast of the Kodak EC-L system actually provides better clinical results. To simulate clinical use, port films were taken using an anthropomorphic phantom that was artificially shifted and/or rotated by a predetermined distance. Identical images were taken using a conventional port film system (AGFA-Gevaert Curix MR4 in lead-lined cassette) and the Kodak EC-L system. Twelve different operators (6 physicists and 6 radiation therapists) were asked to diagnose the problem from a total of 20 port films (10 per treatment site), allowing for direct comparison of the 2 types of films. While the diagnosis of the field displacement improved using the Kodak film, it did not speed-up the decision-making process. It was also found that experienced operators were more accurate at evaluating the films. The results indicate that, for the situations studied (head and neck, pelvis), the Kodak system exhibits better contrast and leads to improved decision making.

Comparisons between MCNP, EGS4 and experiment for clinical electron beams.

Understanding the limitations of Monte Carlo codes is essential in order to avoid systematic errors in simulations, and to suggest further improvement of the codes. MCNP and EGS4, Monte Carlo codes commonly used in medical physics, were compared and evaluated against electron depth dose data and experimental backscatter results obtained using clinical radiotherapy beams. Different physical models and algorithms used in the codes give significantly different depth dose curves and electron backscattering factors. The default version of MCNP calculates electron depth dose curves which are too penetrating. The MCNP results agree better with experiment if the ITS-style energy-indexing algorithm is used. EGS4 underpredicts electron backscattering for high-Z materials. The results slightly improve if optimal PRESTA-I parameters are used. MCNP simulates backscattering well even for high-Z materials. To conclude the comparison, a timing study was performed. EGS4 is generally faster than MCNP and use of a large number of scoring voxels dramatically slows down the MCNP calculation. However, use of a large number of geometry voxels in MCNP only slightly affects the speed of the calculation.

Variation in calculated effective source-surface distances with depth.

Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in solid water. ESSDs were calculated for electron beams in the energy range 4-20 MeV and were found to vary with depth. The surface ESSD varied from 68 cm for 4 MeV to 82 cm for 16 MeV, but increased with depth to a maximum value, which was found at approximately half the practical range (Rp), at 0.3Rp for 4 MeV and at 0.6Rp for 20 MeV. Beyond this depth the ESSD decreased towards the end of the practical range. Without an electron applicator, the ESSD was higher at the surface. For smaller field sizes, the depth of the maximum ESSD increased towards Rp, and ESSD values increased. The 20 MeV beam in the 6 cm x 6 cm2 field showed a difference of 31 cm between the surface ESSD and the maximum ESSD. The ESSD calculated at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) may be used with reasonable accuracy for calculation of the dose in the therapeutic range, except at larger SSDs or when high-energy beams are used in small fields Depth-dose distributions under these conditions should be compared with measured results.

Assessment of mucosal underdosing in larynx irradiation.

PURPOSE: Mucosal underdosing as a result of electron disequilibrium at the air cavity may affect local recurrence rates for T1 and T2 larynx cancers. Secondary build-up properties of high-energy beams have been demonstrated in a slab phantom. It was the aim of this investigation to determine whether significant surface underdosing exists for the mucosa under clinical conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Measurements were made using a thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) extrapolation technique in an anatomic larynx phantom. The larynx phantom was constructed using tissue and cartilage equivalent material, based on patient cross-sectional anatomy. Three different thicknesses of LiF ribbons, 0.14, 0.39, and 0.89 mm, were placed reproducibly at 12 different positions at the anterior, posterior, and lateral walls on the endolarynx surface. Measured doses were plotted and an extrapolation was made back to the mucosal depth to obtain the dose received at each of the positions. Results were obtained for two different field configurations, opposed laterals and oblique fields, for 6-MV X rays and opposed lateral fields from a telecesium unit. In addition, the larynx surface doses of field sizes from 4 x 6 cm2 to 7 x 6 cm2 were investigated. RESULTS: Surface underdosing was observed owing to the secondary build-up and build-down effect of the air cavity, and the dose measured for the three extrapolation TLDs at any position varied by up to 18%. An average variation of 6% was observed. The surface underdosing was most apparent for the 6-MV opposed lateral beam technique, where mucosa doses down to 76% of the prescribed dose were observed. Mucosal underdosing at the measurement positions was less marked with oblique techniques, telecesium treatment, and increasing field size. CONCLUSION: Because of underdosing, some surface positions receive < 80% of the prescribed dose. This may contribute to the potential for higher recurrence rates observed with high-energy photons.

Surface dose measurements for highly oblique electron beams.

Clinical applications of electrons may involve oblique incidence of beams, and although dose variations for angles up to 60 degrees from normal incidence are well documented, no results are available for highly oblique beams. Surface dose measurements in highly oblique beams were made using parallel-plate ion chambers and both standard LiF:Mg, Ti and carbon-loaded LiF Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD). Obliquity factors (OBF) or surface dose at an oblique angle divided by the surface dose at perpendicular incidence, were obtained for electron energies between 4 and 20 MeV. Measurements were performed on a flat solid water phantom without a collimator at 100 cm SSD. Comparisons were also made to collimated beams. The OBFs of surface doses plotted against the angle of incidence increased to a maximum dose followed by a rapid dropoff in dose. The increase in OBF was more rapid for higher energies. The maximum OBF occurred at larger angles for higher-energy beams and ranged from 73 degrees for 4 MeV to 84 degrees for 20 MeV. At the dose maximum, OBFs were between 130% and 160% of direct beam doses, yielding surface doses of up to 150% of Dmax for the 20 MeV beam. At 2 mm depth the dose ratio was found to increase initially with angle and then decrease as Dmax moved closer to the surface. A higher maximum dose was measured at 2 mm depth than at the surface. A comparison of ion chamber types showed that a chamber with a small electrode spacing and large guard ring is required for oblique dose measurement. A semiempirical equation was used to model the dose increase at the surface with different energy electron beams.

Clinical use of carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters for skin dose determination.

PURPOSE: Carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are designed for surface/skin dose measurements. Following 4 years in clinical use at the Mater Hospital, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of the carbon-loaded TLDs was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Teflon-based carbon-loaded lithium fluoride (LiF) disks with a diameter of 13 mm were used in the present study. The TLDs were compared with ion chamber readings and TLD extrapolation to determine the effective depth of the TLD measurement. In vivo measurements were made on patients receiving open-field treatments to the chest, abdomen, and groin. Skin entry dose or entry and exit dose were assessed in comparison with doses estimated from phantom measurements. RESULTS: The effective depth of measurement in a 6 MV therapeutic x-ray beam was found to be about 0.10 mm using TLD extrapolation as a comparison. Entrance surface dose measurements made on a solid water phantom agreed well with ion chamber and TLD extrapolation measurements, and black TLDs provide a more accurate exit dose than the other methods. Under clinical conditions, the black TLDs have an accuracy of +/- 5% (+/- 2 SD). The dose predicted from black TLD readings correlate with observed skin reactions as assessed with reflectance spectroscopy. CONCLUSION: In vivo dosimetry with carbon-loaded TLDs proved to be a useful tool in assessing the dose delivered to the basal cell layer in the skin of patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Factors influencing the degree of erythematous skin reactions in humans.

Dose-response relationships have been studied using an ordinal visual scale and reflectance spectrophotometry data from 123 treatment sites on 110 patients treated with 10 dose fractions over 12-14 days. Dose rates varied between 3 and 240 Gy/h and total doses of between 25 and 41 Gy were given using teletherapy apparatus. We found qualitative scoring of erythematous skin reactions to be subject to considerable inter- and intra-observer variation. Reflectance spectrophotometry provided more reproducible information, some of which was undetectable by naked eye. Baseline erythema readings were significantly higher in male patients and at anatomical sites of previous heavy UV exposure. In addition, a pronounced decline in erythema readings during the second week of therapy and 'reciprocal vicinity' (abscopal) effects adjacent to the field, undetected by the eye, were observed in a subset of patients. Meaningful dose-response relationships could be derived only from reflectance data with peak change from the pretreatment baseline measure providing the best discrimination. Peak erythema measures following treatment were found to depend on the age and gender of the patient as well as the treatment site and its baseline erythema measurement. This was independent of the total dose administered or the instantaneous dose rate at which it was delivered. The rate of erythema development was also dose rate dependent but only weakly dependent on the biological dose intensity (Gy equiv./day) of the treatment course. The data raise the question of whether irradiation-induced erythema is exclusively a secondary phenomenon occurring as a result of basal cell killing. The short repair half time value of 0.06 h obtained by direct analysis is perplexing and may reflect a dose rate-dependent physiological vasodilatory response to irradiation and/or a multi-component cellular repair process.

Acute reaction parameters for human oropharyngeal mucosa.

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of changes in dose rate over the range 0.8-240 Gy/h on acute oropharyngeal mucosal reactions in human subjects, and to estimate the values of the important parameters that influence these reactions. Sixty-one patients requiring radiotherapy to palliate incurable head and neck cancer were treated on a telecaesium unit, using opposing lateral portals to total midline doses, varying between 30 and 42 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks, at dose rates of 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 and 240 Gy/h according to a central composite study design. The severity and time course of reactions were charted at least twice weekly for each patient, using the EORTC/RTOG acute mucosal reaction grading system. Duration of reaction at each grade was observed to provide a more sensitive reflection of effect than the proportion of patients reaching any particular reaction grade. Analysis of duration by direct and indirect methods suggest alpha/beta ratios in the range 7-10 Gy and half-time (t1/2) values in the range 0.27-0.5 h, if mono-exponential repair kinetics are assumed. The t1/2 values are short and raise the question as to whether the repair kinetics of this tissue are well described by a mono-exponential function. Further prospective studies involving multiple daily fraction treatment regimes delivered at high dose rate, in which interfraction interval is deliberately varied, are needed to find out whether the parameters derived from this project are applicable to fractionated treatment courses at high dose rate.

Dosimetry of high energy electron therapy to the parotid region.

Well-known inadequacies in currently available electron planning systems, and two cases of temporal lobe necrosis following electron therapy of the parotid stimulated a comprehensive head and neck phantom dosimetric study of the use of high energy electrons for parotid treatments. A typical electron field employed for the treatment of parotid malignancy was examined in an anthropomorphic head phantom from which air cavities had been excavated. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements were compared with predicted point doses obtained from a Theraplan Treatment planning system (V05). Data was examined for three different electron energies: 12, 16 and 20 MeV and with the addition of contoured bolus for 20 MeV. A number of significant discrepancies between the measured and predicted dose were observed. Measured doses were seen to exceed predicted doses by up to 23% in the temporal lobe. Further under-predictions of dose were found behind the mandible and in the nasal cavity. Over-predictions of dose by the planning algorithm of up to 22% were observed beside the oropharynx. Some of these discrepancies were found to relate to Theraplan under-estimation of the dose in the fall-off region. Other errors are attributable to the difficulties in predicting dose at density interfaces. Localised over- and under-predictions of this magnitude must be accounted for by the clinician prescribing treatment in terms of possible late effects on the temporal lobe and, in particular, the nominated dose specification point.

A comparison of three electron planning algorithms for a 16 MeV electron beam.

PURPOSE: We report results of a comparison of three electron planning algorithms, an Age-Diffusion Pencil beam algorithm and two (2-D) and three dimensional (3-D) Hogstrom pencil beam algorithms, using simple 2 x 2 cm air and hard bone inhomogeneities and a complex anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The simple inhomogeneities have variable dimensions outside the plane of calculation to test the effects of out of plane scattering on 2-D algorithms, compared with dose measured by film below the inhomogeneity in the dose fall-off range. Comparisons are also made of a parotid treatment field for 16 MeV electrons, and the dose measured by high sensitivity thermoluminescent dosimeters in the head and neck phantom. RESULTS: Behind the simple inhomogeneities, the electron algorithms are found to underestimate the dose behind the air cavity by up to 40% and overestimated the dose behind bone by up to 30%. In the head phantom, the presence of inhomogeneities also presents problems for the algorithms, with overestimations of dose of up to 20% found behind bone-tissue interfaces, apparently due to shielding by high density bone. Overestimations of up to 17% are also found beside interfaces parallel to the beam. Underestimations of dose of up to 10% are found on the beam-side of interfaces, due to under-prediction of backscattered electrons. All three investigated algorithms underestimate the dose by up to 20% behind extreme surface curvature. One algorithm is found to underestimate the dose in the falloff region while another overestimates the dose around the 90% isodose. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of their planning systems.