Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 129(2): 840-51, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21361442

ABSTRACT

Both distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) provide frequency-specific assessment of hearing. However, each method suffers from some restrictions. Hearing losses above 50 dB HL are not quantifiable using DPOAEs and their performance at frequencies below 1 kHz is limited, but their recording time is short. In contrast, ASSRs are a time-consuming method but have the ability to determine hearing thresholds in a wider range of frequencies and hearing losses. Thus, recording DPOAEs and ASSRs simultaneously at their adequate frequencies and levels could decrease the overall test time considerably. The goal of the present study was to develop a parameter-setting and test-protocol to measure DPOAEs and ASSRs binaurally and simultaneously at multiple frequencies. Ten normal-hearing and 23 hearing-impaired subjects participated in the study. The interaction of both responses when stimulated simultaneously at frequencies between 0.25 and 6 kHz was examined. Two limiting factors need to be kept. Frequency distance between ASSR carrier frequency f(c) and DPOAE primary tone f(2) needs to be at least 1.5 octaves, and DPOAEs may not be measured if the ASSR stimulus level is 70 dB SPL or above. There was a significant correlation between pure-tone and DPOAE/ASSR-thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss ears.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Perception , Cochlea/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Perceptual Distortion , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sound Spectrography , Young Adult
2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 129(3): 1464-74, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21428510

ABSTRACT

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are usually evoked with air conduction (AC) stimuli. Only a few reports exist about OAEs where stimuli have been delivered using bone conduction (BC) by placing a bone conductor on the forehead or the mastoid. The aims of the present study were to improve the test performance of BC-TEOAEs by using a nonlinear stimulation protocol and to find out, whether this technique can be applied in newborn hearing screening. BC-TEOAEs were measured binaurally in ten normal hearing adults and in ten infants. For measurements in infants, miniaturized probes without loudspeakers were constructed to allow a complete insertion of the probe in the infant's ear canal. It could be shown that robust and valid BC-TEOAEs can be elicited using a nonlinear stimulation protocol. Findings in adults indicated that BC-TEOAEs can be measured with properties similar to AC-TEOAEs. However, mean BC-TEOAE levels were reduced by 0.8-3.7 dB depending on frequency. In view of test time, this is compensated by performing binaural recordings. Measurements in infants indicated that the screening performance of BC-TEOAEs and AC-TEOAEs may be comparable. Further studies have to investigate, whether BC-TEOAEs are more robust than AC-TEOAEs against small conductive hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Aging , Bone Conduction , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Hearing Tests , Neonatal Screening/methods , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Auditory Threshold , Equipment Design , Female , Hearing Tests/instrumentation , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Miniaturization , Neonatal Screening/instrumentation , Predictive Value of Tests , Reaction Time , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 119(6): 3886-95, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16838532

ABSTRACT

A maximum auditory steady-state response (ASSR) amplitude is yielded when the ASSR is elicited by an amplitude-modulated tone (f(c)) with a fixed modulation frequency (f(m) = 40 Hz), whereas the maximum distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level is yielded when the DPOAE is elicited using a fixed frequency ratio of the primary tones (f2/f1 = 1.2). When eliciting the DPOAE and ASSR by the same tone pair, optimal stimulation is present for either DPOAE or ASSR and thus adequate simultaneous DPOAE/ASSR measurement is not possible across test frequency f2 or f(c), respectively. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the ASSR and DPOAE can be measured simultaneously without notable restrictions using a DPOAE stimulus setting in which one primary tone is amplitude modulated. A DPOAE of frequency 2f1-f2 and ASSR of modulation frequency 41 Hz were measured in ten normal hearing subjects at a test frequency between 0.5 and 8 kHz (f2 = f(c)). The decrease in the DPOAE level and the loss in ASSR amplitude during hybrid mode stimulation amounted, on average, to only 2.60 dB [standard deviation (SD) = 1.38 dB] and 1.83 dB (SD = 2.38 dB), respectively. These findings suggest simultaneous DPOAE and ASSR measurements to be feasible across all test frequencies when using a DPOAE stimulus setting where the primary tone f2 is amplitude modulated.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Perceptual Distortion/physiology , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mathematical Computing , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Z Med Phys ; 13(2): 93-8, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12868334

ABSTRACT

2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions were recorded in 796 ears with sensorineural hearing loss at up to 50 frequencies between 500 Hz and 8 kHz in a wide level range from L2 = 20 to L2 = 65 dB SPL at up to 10 levels ("scissor paradigm", L1 = 0.4 L2 + 39, f2/f1 = 1.2). DPOAEs were accepted as valid for signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) only if they exceeded 6 dB. To assess the DPOAE threshold, DPOAE input/output functions (L2--DPOAE sound pressure diagram) were subject to linear regression and extrapolation; the point of intersection with the L2 coordinate was then interpreted as DPOAE threshold [1]. The linear fit of the function pDP(L2) = a + bL2 (whereby a and b represent the threshold and the slope of the DPOAE growth, respectively), reflects compression and sensitivity of the cochlear amplifier. Using a weighted least mean square error (LMSE) regression, more than 70% of the DPOAE I/O functions of the data set can be used for the threshold estimation. High correlation and relatively small differences between objectively estimated DPOAE threshold and subjectively determined hearing threshold of pure-tone audiograms prove that the weighted extrapolation of DPOAE I/O functions can be a valuable clinical tool for the objective assessment of cochlear hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Audiology/methods , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...