ABSTRACT
The goal of the experiment was to develop an identification method capable of objective detection of changes of viscoelastic properties of skin with a scar remaining after a modified radical mastectomy. We compared the intact skin and the skin with a scar, a scar before and after physiotherapy. We used two methods. The first one is based on measurements of the local dynamic deformation response of the skin and the second one is the matrix identification of static deformation that identifies properties of the whole tested region of the explored tissues. We identified the skin stretchability, shiftability against deeper layers and deeply analysed both the methods. In some patients, we found statistically proven difference. In all these cases the measurement methods have detected changes of the observed tissue condition. We found both methods to be potentially applicable after further improvements as a diagnostic tool, which can contribute to the improvement of postoperative care of patients.
Subject(s)
Cicatrix/diagnosis , Cicatrix/therapy , Models, Biological , Physical Therapy Modalities , Rheology/methods , Skin , Cicatrix/physiopathology , Elasticity , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Modified Radical , Postoperative Care/instrumentation , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Rheology/instrumentation , Weight-BearingABSTRACT
This study investigated the discomfort caused by car driving. Discomfort estimates were achieved by self-administered questionnaire, measured by different testing methods, and through the goniometry of principal angles. Data from a total of 200 non-professional drivers who fulfilled the questionnaire was analysed. 118 subjects were analysed by goniometry and 30 drivers were assessed using the OWAS (Ovaco orking Posture Analysis), RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment), and CORLETT tests. The aim of this paper was to assess the appearance of the discomfort and to find some correlations between drivers' postures. Results suggest that different levels of discomfort are perceived in different body regions when driving cars. Differences appear mostly between the genders concerning the discomfort. With the questionnaire and the different estimation techniques, it is possible to identify 'at risk' drivers and ensure urgent attention when necessary. It can be concluded that the questionnare and the CORLETT test are good in predicting location of discomfort. TheB org CRI10scale is good indicator of the level of the discomfort, while OWAS and RULA can appraise the body posture to predict discomfort appearance. According to the goniometry data, the drivers posture could be one of the contributing factors in appearing of discomfort.
