Exploratory randomized phase II trial for optimizing treatment dosage and duration of adjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with stage III colon cancer: YCOG1402 (SOAP trial).

Introduction: Conventionally, the recommended duration of adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer had been 6 months. The IDEA Collaboration suggested that shortening capecitabin and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) adjuvant chemotherapy may be possible. S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) treatment is standard treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. The aim of this study was to optimize treatment dosage and duration of adjuvant SOX in stage III colon cancer. Methods: This trial was as open-label multi-center randomized phase II study. Patients with stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant SOX treatment in different doses: 130 mg/m2 (3 months) or 100 mg/m2 (6 months) of oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was that the 3-year DFS was ≤72% in each arm and was tested with a one-sided significance level of 10%. Results: Eighty-two patients were assigned to the 6 months arm and 81 to the 3 months arm. The 3-year DFS was 75.0% (80% CI 67.95-80.72, p = 0.282) in the 6 months arm and 76.9% (80% CI 70.1-82.38, p = 0.171) in the 3 months arm. Treatment completion rate and relative dose intensity (RDI) were higher in 3 months than 6 months arm. The adverse events (AE) were similar in both arms. Conclusions: The 3-year DFS was not significantly superior to null hypothesis in both 3 months and 6 months arms for the stage III colon cancer. Primary endpoint was not achieved. The SOX regimen was not feasible in long-term outcomes.

A Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter Trial of Diverting Stoma Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using mFOLFOX6 for Obstructive Colon Cancer: YCOG 1305 (PROBE Study).

OBJECTIVE: We conducted the first prospective clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with obstructive colon cancer. BACKGROUND: Obstructive colorectal cancer is locally advanced colorectal cancer with a poor prognosis. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for obstructive colon cancer is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a single arm, multicenter trial involving patients from the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group with obstructive colon cancer. All eligible patients underwent diverting stoma formation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patient received 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 followed by primary tumor surgery and then 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate of all intended neoadjuvant therapy. The study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000013198. RESULTS: Between April 2014, and July 2016, 50 patients were registered, and 46 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective response rate as the primary endpoint was 67.4%. The most common grade >3 adverse event associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was neutropenia (28.3%). Forty-five patients underwent surgical resection of the primary lesion (R0 resection in all cases). Grade >2 surgery-related complications occurred in 7 patients (15.6%). The downstaging rate was 48.9%, and the moderate or greater regression rate was 52.2%; no cases showed pathological complete response. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 was performed in 34 patients (75.6%). The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 76.5% and 95.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using mFOLFOX6 was feasible and might be a treatment option for patients with obstructive colon cancer. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm the present findings.

Relationship between stromal regulatory T cells and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In addition to the direct power of anticancer drugs, the effectiveness of anticancer therapy depends on the host immune function. The present study investigated whether or not the reduction rate and histological response of preoperative chemotherapy were related to the immune microenvironment surrounding a primary tumor of the rectum. METHODS: Sixty-five patients received preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection from 2012 to 2014; all of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. CD3, CD8, and FoxP3 were immunohistochemically examined as markers for T lymphocytes, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg), respectively. The correlation between the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte composition and the tumor reduction rate and histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was investigated. RESULTS: The average tumor reduction rate was 41.5% ± 18.8%. According to RECIST, 47 patients (72.3%) achieved a partial response (PR), and 1 patient (1.5%) achieved a complete response (CR). Eight patients (12.3%) showed a grade 2 histological response, and 2 (3.1%) showed a grade 3 response. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that a low Treg infiltration in stromal cell areas was significantly associated with the achievement of a PR or CR [odds ratio (OR) 7.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96-33.33; p < 0.01] and a histological grade 2 or 3 response (OR 11.11; 95% CI 1.37-98.04; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A low Treg infiltration in the stromal cell areas may be a marker of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Risk factors for surgical site infection and association of surgical site infection with survival of lower rectal cancer patients without clinical lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (clinical Stage II/III): Analysis of data from JCOG0212.

This study aimed to examine the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) and the association of that with recurrence in JCOG0212. The results for secondary endpoints showed that compared with the mesorectal excision (ME) alone group, ME with lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) group showed significantly longer operative time and significantly higher blood loss. These results suggested that LLND was a risk factor for SSI. All 701 patients registered in JCOG0212 were analyzed in this study. Wound infection was defined as incisional/deep SSI, and pelvic abscess and anastomotic leakage were defined as organ/space SSI. The risk factors for the incidence of SSI and the effect of SSI on relapse-free survival (RFS) were investigated. Multivariable odds ratio of Grade 2 or higher all SSI was 0.58 [95% Confidence interval: 0.36-0.93] for female (vs. male) and that of Grade 2 or higher incisional/deep SSI was 2.24 [1.03-4.86] for blood infusion. For RFS, patients with Grade 3 or higher all SSI showed poor prognosis (multivariable hazard ratio: 1.66 [1.03-2.68]). LLND is not significant factor for the incidence of all SSI. Male sex might be a risk factor of Grade 2 or higher SSI, and blood transfusion is a possible risk factor of Grade 2 or higher incisional/deep SSI. Grade 3 or higher all SSI might be a significant worse prognostic factor for lower rectal cancer.

Identification of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Whom Preoperative Radiotherapy Can Be Omitted: A Multicenter Retrospective Study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG1307).

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to identify patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in whom preoperative radiotherapy (RT) can be omitted. METHODS: This study was a retrospective multi-institutional study for patients with pathological stage II and III rectal cancer who underwent surgery without preoperative therapy between January 2008 and December 2012. Clinicopathological factors were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses to clarify independent risk factors of local recurrence (LR). RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate (LRR) of 815 patients was 11.2%. Independent predictive factors of LR were determined by a multivariate analysis to be a tumor location of <10 cm from the anal verge, a tumor diameter of ≥50 mm, undifferentiated histological type, and advanced T-N substage (T3N+ or T4Nany). In lower rectal cancer located <10 cm from the anal verge (n = 510), the 5-year cumulative LRR of patients without any remaining three factors was 4.4%, with one factor was 13.0%, with two factors was 22.2%, and with all three factors was 41.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative RT may be omitted in patients with lower rectal cancer with no risk factors. However, in addition to the present risk factors, we need to further examine the extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) status and circumferential resection margin (CRM) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trails Registry, number 000006039.

Long-term Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-incision Versus Multi-port Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes that were the secondary endpoints of a RCT of multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MPC) versus SILC in colon cancer surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The actual long-term outcomes, such as the 5-year RFS, OS, and recurrence patterns after surgery, have not been evaluated by a RCT. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven colon carcinoma located in the cecum, ascending, sigmoid or rectosigmoid colon clinically diagnosed as stage 0-III were eligible for this study. Patients were preoperatively randomized and underwent complete mesocolic excision. The 5-year RFS, OS, and recurrence patterns were analyzed (UMIN-CTR 000007220). RESULTS: Between March 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015, a total of 200 patients were randomly assigned to either the MPC arm (n = 100) or SILC arm (n = 100). The median follow-up for all patients was 61.0 months. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that the 5-year RFS was 91.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85.1%-96.9%] in the MPC arm and 88.0% (95% CI 82.1%-93.9%) in the SILC arm (hazard ratio: 1.37; 95% CI 0.58-3.24; P = 0.479). The 5-year OS was 95.0% (95% CI 91.1%-98.9%) in the MPC arm and 93.0% (87.1%-98.9%) in the SILC arm (hazard ratio: 1.39; 95% CI 0.44-4.39; P = 0.568). There were no significant differences in the recurrence patterns between the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the results of the 5-year OS and RFS in this trial were exploratory and underpowered, there were no statistically significant differences between the SILC and MPC arms. SILC may be an acceptable treatment option for select patients with colon cancer.

A multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort study about short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the results of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) compared to open surgery (OP) for locally advanced mid-to-lower rectal cancer. METHODS: From February 2008 to December 2014, we collected patient data with clinical stage II/III mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent resection with LAP or OP at 13 institutions associated with the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG). The short-term outcomes and long-term prognoses associated with LAP and OP were analyzed after adjusting for the patients' backgrounds using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among 1091 eligible cases, a propensity score matching with six covariates-age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category, tumor location, and clinical stage-extracted 237 cases each for the LAP and OP groups, respectively. After matching, there were no differences in background factors between the two groups except for the presence or absence of preoperative treatment. Operative time was significantly longer in the LAP group than that in the OP group (p < 0.001), while the amount of bleeding and the length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the LAP group than that in the OP group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of postoperative complications. The 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 90.5% and 88.6% and 78.3% and 71.6% in the LAP and OP groups, respectively, which did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcomes and long-term prognoses of LAP in this cohort study indicated that LAP could be a therapeutic option for locally advanced rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000040406.

Hernia incidence following a randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic colectomy.

BACKGROUND: The short-term results of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) showed the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. However, the long-term complications, such as SILC-associated incisional hernia, have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC compared with multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MPC) for colon cancer. METHODS: From March 2012, to March 2015, a total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to the MPC arm and SILC arm. A total of 200 patients (MPC arm; 100 patients, SILC arm; 100 patients) were therefore analyzed. In all cases the specimen was extracted through the umbilical port, which was extended according to the size of the specimen. A diagnosis of incisional hernia was made either based on a physical examination or computed tomography. RESULTS: The baseline factors were well balanced between the arms. The median follow-up period was 42.4 (range 9.4-70.0) months. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with incisional hernia, giving an incidence rate of 12.1% in the MPC arm and 9.0% in the SILC arm at 36 months (P = 0.451). In the multivariate analysis, the body mass index (≥ 25 kg/m2) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-8.92; P = 0.044), umbilical incision (≥ 5.0 cm) (HR 3.22; 95% CI 1.16-8.93; P = 0.025), and history of umbilical hernia (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.02-9.77; P = 0.045) were shown to be correlated with incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC arm versus MPC arm with a long-term follow-up. However, this result may be biased because all specimens were harvested through the umbilical port. The study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000007220.

Oncological outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for locally advanced rectal cancer: is LLND alone sufficient?

BACKGROUND: Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) has been considered as the standard treatment strategy for locally advanced lower rectal cancer in Japan. Controversy remains around whether all patients require LLND. This study aims to examine the long-term outcomes of patients in which LLND was performed and clarify the value of LLND. METHOD: Consecutive 458 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND from 1992 to 2012 were included. The long-term outcomes and risk factors for recurrent in patients performed TME + LLND were examined. We assessed the impact of LLND on survival using an estimated therapeutic index. RESULTS: The incidence of LLNM was 15.5%. The 5-year RFS and OS rates of patients with LLNM were 40.9% and 47.7%, while patients without LLNM had a good prognosis. The 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 9.2%, and independent risk factors for LR were T4 and LLNM. The LR rate of patients with LLNM was high (22.8%). The LLNM rate of the groups with 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 risk factors (male, tumor location < 4 cm from anal verge, T4, and MLNM) was 3.8%, 9.2%, 18.1%, and 50.0%. The 5-year OS of the groups was 96.2%, 86.1%, 69.7%, and 48.5%. CONCLUSION: Although patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer who received LLND had a good prognosis, LLND alone was insufficient to control local recurrence in patients with metastatic lateral nodes.

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on large-scale trials for the long-term outcomes regarding laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open LLND for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2016, consecutive clinical stage II to III middle/lower rectal cancer patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND were retrospectively collected at three institutions. Laparoscopic LLND was compared with open LLND for the surgical and oncological outcomes, including the long-term survival, using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were collected. There were 142 patients who underwent open TME plus LLND (open group) and 183 patients who underwent laparoscopic TME plus LLND (laparoscopic group). A total of 93 patients each were matched to each group. Compared to the open group, the laparoscopic group had a significantly longer operative time (327 vs. 377 min; p = 0.002) but significantly less blood loss (540 vs. 50 ml; p < 0.001), fewer Clavian-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (49.5% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.037) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (18 vs. 14 days; p = 0.008). Furthermore, the rate of urinary retention was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (16.1% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.037). The estimated 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were 91.4%, 73.1%, and 3.4% in the open group and 90.3%, 74.2%, and 4.3% in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.879, 0.893, 0.999), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that laparoscopic LLND had advantages over an open approach, such as less blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay, and the oncologic outcomes were similar to the open approach. Laparoscopic LLND could be a viable standard approach to LLND for advanced middle/lower rectal cancer surgery.

[Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Adachi Type â ¥ Vascular Anomaly-A Case Report].

We report a case of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer with an anomalous celiac trunk categorized as Type Ⅵ- Group 24 in the Adachi classification. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an 81-year-old male revealed a shallow depressed lesion in the middle of the gastric body. Close examination led to diagnosis of cT1bN0M0, cStage Ⅰ gastric cancer, and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was planned. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed no anomalous bifurcation of the hepatic artery, but the common hepatic artery ran on the dorsal side of the portal vein, branching from the superior mesenteric artery. Therefore, an Adachi Type Ⅵ-Group 24 celiac trunk anomaly was diagnosed. During surgery, the common hepatic artery could not be confirmed in guiding suprapancreatic lymph node dissection, and the portal vein was exposed. Anterior to the portal vein, nerves that are usually around the common hepatic artery continuously ran toward the hepatoduodenal ligament instead. Suprapancreatic lymph nodes were dissected, with the portal vein considered as the common hepatic artery. Adachi Type Ⅵ is a rare anomaly with an incidence of about 2%. Preoperative diagnosis enables safe and appropriate lymph node dissection.

Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study).

BACKGROUND: We reported favorable short-term results of laparoscopic surgery in a randomized study comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study is to clarify the long-term outcomes of the laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with CRC. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were ≥ 75 years, adenocarcinoma, ≤ T4a, M0 and elective surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to open or laparoscopic surgery according to the tumor location. The survival rates, recurrence and reasons for death were compared. RESULT: One hundred patients (right colon 43, left colon 28, rectum 29) were included in each group. Eight patients who underwent open surgery and 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were excluded from the analysis because of metastatic diseases and other malignancies found during the operations. One hundred ninety patients (98 open, 98 laparoscopic) were analyzed. There was no difference in the backgrounds excluding more patients with vascular invasion in the laparoscopic rectal cancer. There were no differences in the 5-year overall survival rate (open vs. laparoscopic; 78.9% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.638), 5-year disease-free survival rate (70.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.276), 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (76.1% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.419), or 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (86.1% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.208). No differences in survival were detected in the analyses of stage and tumor location. There was no significant difference in the overall recurrence rate or recurrence site. However, distant lymph node metastases and local recurrences were more common after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. There was no difference in the cause of death. More than half of the patients died from other diseases in both groups (57.9% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.765). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery showed similar long-term results compared to open surgery in elderly patients with CRC. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective surgical procedure for elderly patients with CRC.

The risk factors for incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter retrospective study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after colorectal surgery. However, the risk factors for incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) have not been fully elucidated. This retrospective study analyzed the incidence rate of IH and evaluated the risk factors for IH after LCRS. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-institution study of 423 colorectal cancer patients conducted between September 2012 and December 2014 in Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group. The diagnosis of IH was based on computed tomography and physical examination findings. The patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 423 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 48.4 months. IH was observed in 36 patients (8.5%). The 1-year incidence of IH was 5.2%, and the 4-year incidence was 8.5%. A multivariate analysis showed that preoperative umbilical hernia (odds ratio [OR] 5.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-16.10; p = 0.001) and a visceral fat area (VFA) ≥ 100 cm2 (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.08-6.96; p = 0.035) were independent risk factors of IH after LCRS. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors of IH after LCRS were preoperative umbilical hernia and VFA ≥ 100 cm2. In the case with an umbilical hernia or VFA ≥ 100 performing LCRS, it should likely NOT have a peri-umbilical extraction site and should be considered for an alternate site like a low transverse or Pfannenstiel incision. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number 000038707.

Optimal extent of central lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancers: is lymphadenectomy beyond the superior mesenteric vein meaningful?

PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to assess the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy according to the extent of lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing colectomy for right-sided colon cancer were identified. Distribution of lymph node metastases (DLNM) of 1, 2 and 3 were defined as lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the pericolic nodes, the intermediate nodes and the front of the SMV near the origin of the major artery, respectively. The therapeutic index (TI) was calculated based on the frequency of LNM and the 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with LNM. RESULTS: Among 344 patients who met the inclusion criteria, roughly half had LNM (n = 150, 43.7%). While 107 (31.1%) and 30 (8.7%) patients had DLNM1 and DLNM2, respectively, only 13 patients (3.8%) were defined as DLNM3. However, there was no significant difference in 5 year OS by DLNM (DLNM1 71.1%, DLNM2 78.7%, DLNM3 50.4%, p = 0.61). Overall, the TI of lymphadenectomy for D3 area was approximately 1/10 of the TI for D1 (1.9 vs.22.1), given the low frequency of LNM (3.8%) and poor 5 year OS of patients with LNM (50.4%). This trend was consistent irrespective of primary tumor locations. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit from central lymphadenectomy namely D3 was low among patients with right-sided colon cancers.

Risk factors of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study (YCOG1301).

PURPOSE: Although the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy for colorectal cancer chemotherapy has improved with further drug development, some patients still suffer from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) even with only 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. The present study investigated the risk factors of CINV in patients who received chemotherapy for colorectal cancer and clarified which patients need additional neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer receiving moderate-emetic-risk chemotherapy (MEC) were enrolled in this prospective single-arm study with intravenous palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone 9.9 mg before chemotherapy and with paroral dexamethasone 8 mg on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate for delayed-phase CINV. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were eligible for this study. The delayed CR rate was 84.9% (152/179). There were no significant differences in any risk factors, but women with a low body mass index (BMI) (a combination of "female sex" and "BMI < 20") showed a significantly lower rate of CC (complete control) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17-1.13; p = 0.039), and young patients with a low BMI (combination of "age < 65" and "BMI < 20") showed a significantly lower rate of CR (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13-0.88; p = 0.022) than the other patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to identify any single risk factors associated with delayed CINV in patients who received chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. However, combinations of "thin and women" or "young and thin patients" might be possible predictive conditions, thus, candidates for NK1 receptor antagonist administration in MEC. Further investigations are required to develop criteria for the supplementation of NK1 receptor antagonist.

A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus panitumumab in clinical stage III rectal cancer with KRAS wild-type. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II trial. KRAS wild-type clinical stage III rectal cancer patients were enrolled. Patients received 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 with 6 mg/kg panitumumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the response rate (RR) defined by RECIST. Lateral lymph node dissection (LLDN) was performed when patients had a locally advanced tumor < 9 cm from the anal margin. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled. Twelve (24.0%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The RR was 88.0% (complete response 2.0%, partial response 86.0%), which met the primary outcome. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and achieved R0 resection. Seven patients underwent resection of other adjacent organs, and 43 underwent LLND. Twelve patients (24.0%) experienced grade 3-4 postoperative complications, and 4 (8.0%) had pathological complete response (pCR). Thirteen patients (26.0%) had lymph node metastasis. Forty-five patients (90.0%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.0% and 93.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab without radiotherapy resulted in a low pCR rate but a high PR rate, low local recurrence rate, and good long-term outcome, suggesting that this treatment strategy may be a viable option for patients unable or unwilling to receive radiotherapy. The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number 000006039.

The effect of TJ-28 (Eppikajutsuto) on the prevention of hand-foot syndrome using Capecitabine for colorectal cancer: The Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group Study (YCOG1102).

BACKGROUND: Eppikajututo (TJ-28, a Kampo medicine) is effective against rheumatoid arthritis and eczema. We conducted a randomized comparative trial to assess the efficacy of TJ-28 for preventing hand-foot syndrome (HFS) as a complication of adjuvant chemotherapy using capecitabine. METHODS: The present study was a multi-institutional randomized-controlled trial (UMIN000005899). Colorectal cancer patients scheduled to receive capecitabine chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy were randomly assigned to receive TJ-28 (7500 mg/day) or oral pyridoxine (60 mg/day). Patients were monitored for the development of grade ≥ 2 HFS according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria until chemotherapy completion. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study. The relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 76.2% in the TJ-28 group and 68.2% in the pyridoxine group. Grade ≥ 2 HFS developed in 6 (50.0%) of 12 TJ-28 patients and in 4 (40.0%) of 10 pyridoxine patients. Chemotherapy treatment failure was observed in seven patients, mainly due to HFS, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, and neutropenia. Chemotherapy treatment failure due to HFS occurred in none of the TJ-28 group and 2 patients (20.0%) in the pyridoxine group (p = 0.114). CONCLUSION: Capecitabine-associated HFS was not markedly prevented by TJ-28 compared with pyridoxine. However, TJ-28 might support the continuation of chemotherapy with capecitabine. Further studies are warranted to clarify the benefits of TJ-28.