Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth Whitening Protocols. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part 2.

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of two different home whitening protocols and to determine which is more effective: applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in terms of tooth sensitivity are also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients was randomly divided into 3 groups of 24 (N=24). Group A: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 48h for 6 weeks. Group B: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 72h for 6 weeks. Group C (control group): a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48h for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer and ANOVA test and Bonferroni test was used. The confidence level was set at 95% (p ≤ 0.05) and no statistically significant differences between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48h or every 72h for 6 weeks (p> 0.05) were found. The study concluded that carbamide peroxide 16% is equally effective applied with both protocols, obtaining the same results.

Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth Whitening Protocols.

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of two different at-home whitening protocols and to determine which is more effective: applying the whitening gel (16% carbamide peroxide) every 24 hours (Group A) or every 48 hours (Group B) for 2 weeks. Group C received a placebo gel (glycerin) without peroxide, which was applied every 24 hours for 2 weeks. The differences in terms of tooth sensitivity were also analyzed. A sample of 60 patients was divided into three groups of 20 patients. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer, and Student t test was used for independent samples. The confidence level was set at 95% (P ≤ .05). No statistically significant differences were found between Groups A and B (P > .05). The study concluded that 16% carbamide peroxide was equally effective when applied with either protocol and obtained the same results, but the 48-hour application protocol produced less sensitivity than the 24-hour application protocol.

Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of skeletal Class III treatment.

BACKGROUND: Class III malocclusion is associated with high sexual dimorphism, especially in individuals older than 13 years of age, with significant differences in growth between males and females during the pubertal and postpubertal stages, and in adulthood. The aim of this research was to examine differences between males and females in long-term stability (10 years) of treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion. METHODS: Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females) with skeletal Class III malocclusion, who had been treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) combined with face mask protraction followed by fixed appliances, were selected sequentially. Thirty patients (15 males and 15 females) with skeletal Class I and mesofacial patterns treated only with fixed appliances for dental problems served as the control group. Differences between groups and sexes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms taken at the start of treatment (T0), immediately after the end of treatment (T1), and after 10 years (T2). The long-term treatment success rate was calculated. RESULTS: Ten years after Class III treatment, overjet and overbite relapse occurred similarly in females (- 0.68 ± 0.7 mm; - 0.38 ± 0.75 mm, respectively) and males (- 1.09 ± 1.47 mm; - 0.64 ± 0.9 mm, respectively); the ANB angle and Wits appraisal became significantly more negative in males (- 1.37 ± 1.06°; - 2.7 ± 2.53 mm) than in females (- 0.18 ± 1.26°; - 0.46 ± 1.94 mm). The success rate was 73.3% in males and 80% in females. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in the long-term stability of Class III treatment outcomes have been found between males and females, with a larger skeletal Class III relapse and lower long-term success rates in males.

Pain and Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients During Initial Therapy with Conventional, Low-Friction, and Lingual Brackets and Aligners (Invisalign): A Prospective Clinical Study.

The aim of this study was to compare pain and its relationship with the oral quality of life of patients with different types of orthodontic appliances: conventional and conventional low-friction brackets, lingual brackets, and aligners. A prospective clinical study was carried out with a sample size of 120 patients (54 men, 66 women) divided into 4 groups of 30 patients each. The modified McGill questionnaire was used to measure pain at 4, 8, and 24 h and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after the start of treatment, and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to measure the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in the first month of treatment. The maximum peak of pain was obtained between 24 and 48 h of treatment. It was found that patients in the lingual orthodontic group described lower levels of pain at all times analyzed, and their scores in the total OHIP-14 indicated less impact on their oral quality of life (1.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.01) compared with the other groups analyzed. There was little difference with the aligners group (Invisalign) (1.7 ± 1.9, p < 0.01). The technique used influences the pain and quality of life of patients at the start of orthodontic treatment.