Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training.

This study sought to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopedic surgery residency training across the United States. A 26-question online survey was created and sent to all orthopedic surgery residency programs across the United States. Areas of emphasis in the survey included the pandemic's effect on work hours, operative experience, didactics, and medical student recruitment. There were 142 respondents to the survey. One hundred seventeen (82.4%) respondents stated that their residency changed to an alternative/surge schedule during the pandemic. Regarding the degree to which the pandemic affected their training, 77 (54.2%) respondents gave a rating of 8 to 10 on a scale of 0 to 10. Similarly, 94 (66.2%) residents indicated that their operative experience had decreased significantly. Twenty-two (15.5%) residents expected that their next year clinical abilities would not be affected. One hundred thirty-seven (96.5%) residents stated their program transitioned to online didactics. Responses regarding the effectiveness of online didactics were mixed. One hundred twenty-six (88.7%) respondents stated the pandemic would negatively affect the 2021 National Residency Matching Program match. This study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic greatly affected orthopedic surgery residency training in the United States. Resident operative experience decreased significantly, and most respondents indicated a switch to online didactics. Effects were also felt to extend to fourth-year scheduling and the 2021 National Residency Matching Program match. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):315-319.].

Hand Tumors: An Individual Surgeon's Retrospective Review.

Background: Tumors of the hand are encountered frequently and represent a variety of pathologic diagnoses, both benign and malignant. Even within a single pathologic type, presentation can vary. This study reviews hand tumors encountered by an individual surgeon and described presenting features to better aid in clinical decision making. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients presenting with a hand tumor between January 2005 and December 2017 from an individual surgeon's perspective was performed. Pertinent data were extracted by researchers and statistical analysis was completed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc). Results: A total of 101 patients aged 14 months to 87 years (mean age, 40.52 years) were included. Within this patient group, soft tissue tumors accounted for 97%, malignant neoplasm 2%, and bone tumors 1%. Ganglion cysts were most common (54.5%) followed by hemangiomas (9.9%), giant cell tumors (6.9%), granulomas (5.9%), and fibromas (5%). A total of 54.5% of patients reported pain and 43.5% reported decreased range of motion (ROM). Conclusions: In this patient cohort, ganglion cyst was the most common tumor type and presented with pain and deficits in ROM. This is contrary to the asymptomatic presentation of such cases in the literature. Other common tumors were hemangiomas, giant cell tumors, granulomas, and fibromas. Malignant tumors were rare, as expected, and both cases presented without pain or tenderness.

Is Insurance Status Associated With Likelihood of Operative ACL Injury Treatment Compared With Nonoperative Treatment?

Background: While many factors inform the choice of operative versus nonoperative treatment of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee, socioeconomic status influences this decision, as has been reported with other procedures. Purpose: To identify any associations between insurance status and likelihood of operative treatment of ACL injuries. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for ACL injuries and reconstruction from 2001 to 2013. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine significant predictors of operative intervention. Binary logistic regression was used to account for demographic and significant predictor variables. Results were recorded as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: A total of 32,541 patients with ACL injuries were included in the final analysis. Overall incidence of surgical reconstruction was 85.4% (n = 27,805). Multivariable regression revealed that nonprivate insurance types were associated with lower likelihoods of operative reconstruction compared with private insurance: the lowest likelihood of operation was seen in uninsured patients (OR, 0.31; P < .01), followed by Medicare (OR, 0.33; P < .01) and Medicaid (OR, 0.51; P < .01) patients. There was also a decreased likelihood of surgery for elderly (OR, 0.0 [for age ≥75 years]; P < .01) and Black patients (OR, 0.65; P < .01). An increased likelihood of surgery was seen with female patients (OR, 1.14; P < .01). Patients in the highest median household income quartile were more likely to undergo surgery than those in the lowest (OR, 1.36; P < .01). Conclusion: Compared with privately insured patients, patients with nonprivate insurance had lower likelihood of surgery. Furthermore, patients in higher income quartiles were more likely to undergo operative fixation. These findings may suggest a need for more precise treatment guidelines and studies that investigate causes of such differences.

Differences in the Predictive value of Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and the Charlson Comorbidity indices in patients with hand infections.

PURPOSE: Hand infections are a common source of potentially debilitating morbidity, particularly in patients with comorbid disease. We hypothesize that there is a difference in predictive value between two commonly used comorbidity indices for the prognosis of hand infections, which may have clinical implications in the management of these conditions. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2013 database was queried for hand infections using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The Elixhauser (ECI) and Charlson (CCI) comorbidity scores were calculated based on validated sets of ICD-9 codes. Primary outcomes included mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS, defined as >95 percentile), discharge destination, and postoperative complications. Indices were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the areas under the curve (AUC). If confidence intervals overlapped, significance was determined using the DeLong method for correlated ROC curves. This is a validated, non-parametric comparison used for the calculation of the difference between two AUCs. RESULTS: A weighted total of 1,511,057 patients were included in this study. The majority were Caucasian (57.1%) males (61.4%). Complication rates included 0.9% mortality, 5.3% prolonged length of stay, 25.3% discharges to non-home destinations, and 5.3% post-operative complications. The ECI and CCI each demonstrated good predictive value for mortality, but poor predictive value for non-routine discharge, prolonged LOS, and post-operative complications. There was a significantly increased likelihood of each complication with increasing comorbidity score for both indices, with the greatest odds ratio in the ECI ≥4 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The CCI was superior in predicting mortality while the ECI was superior in predicting non-routine discharge, prolonged length of stay, and postoperative complications, but these indices may not be clinically relevant. While both represent good predictive models, a score specifically designed for patients with hand infections may have superior prognostic value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Clavicle fractures: Associated trauma and morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures are frequently associated with trauma to regions beyond the immediate zone of injury. In order to provide surgeons with information on injury prevalence to prevent delays in diagnosis and management, we describe the epidemiology of concomitant injuries in patients with clavicle fractures and identify differences between those with open and closed fractures. Methods:The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2001-2013 database was queried for adult patients discharged with a diagnosis of a clavicle fracture using ICD-9 codes. A "common" injury was defined as prevalence ≥4.0% in our study population. We analyzed data for injury locations associated with open vs. closed clavicle fractures with chi square and independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 41,1612 patients were included in our study population. The majority of patients had closed clavicle fractures (98.2%). The most common concomitant fracture was that of the rib, followed by the spine. The most common non-vascular, non-nervous injury was a hemo/pneumothorax followed by a lung, bronchus, or diaphragm injury. Fractures of the humerus, rib, scapula, pelvis, tibia or fibula, and facial bones as well as concussion, pneumo/hemothorax, other pulmonary, and splenic injuries were more common in patients with open clavicle fractures. Patients with open clavicle fractures were, on average, 11.8 years younger than those with closed fractures. CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between clavicle fractures and concussion, splenic, and thoracic injuries, as well as increased rate of complications with open fractures. Clinicians may use this information to perform risk assessments prevent delays in diagnosis.

A new role for orthopaedic surgeons: ongoing changes, lessons learned, and perspectives from a level I trauma center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has redefined global health care. With almost 13 million confirmed cases worldwide, medical professionals have been forced to modify their practice to take care of an expanded, critically ill population. Institutions have been challenged to implement innovative ways to maximize the utility and the safety of residents and personnel. Guided by lessons learned from prior mass causalities, wars, and previous pandemics, adjustments have been made in order to provide optimal care for all patients while still protecting limited resources and the lives of health care workers. Specialists who are trained in the management of lethal aspects of this disease continue to have a high demand and obvious role. Orthopedic surgeons, with ill-defined roles, have been redeployed to manage complex medical problems. Still, the need to manage trauma, fractures, infections, tumors, and dislocations remains a necessity. Various innovative measures have been taken to maximize the utility and safety of residents in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Commonalities to most measures and distinct changes in practice philosophy can be identified and applied to both current and future pandemic responses.