Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent Educ ; 79(4): 424-31, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25838014

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to validate a health professions ethics rubric by an interprofessional team. The rubric was used by two pharmacy and two dental faculty members to score ethics cases submitted by 16 teams comprised of 80 pharmacy and 50 dental students. A debriefing session for each case was moderated by a non-rater faculty member to arrive at a consensus score for the cases. Interrater reliability was calculated for the four raters and the debriefing scores as well as the four raters without the debriefing scores. The overall interrater correlations were in the range of 0.790 to 0.906 for the four raters. Issues ranged from 0.320 to 0.758. Principles ranged from 0.610 to 0.838. Options ranged from 0.655 to 0.843. Analysis ranged from 0.667 to 0.918. Solution ranged from 0.739 to 0.886. With the inclusion of the consensus scores, the interrater correlations were even higher. The best correlations were for the overall score and solution components of the rubric. With further edits in the rubric and enhanced training by faculty raters and changes in the ethics learning session, the revised rubric could be evaluated again for grading. Further training for faculty using the rubric for grading student cases should enhance its reliability. Demonstrating to students the ethical decision making process using the rubric should enhance the validation process.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental , Education, Pharmacy , Ethics, Dental/education , Ethics, Pharmacy/education , Teaching/methods , Beneficence , Confidentiality/ethics , Empathy/ethics , Faculty , Faculty, Dental , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Patient Care Team , Personal Autonomy , Students, Dental , Students, Pharmacy , Truth Disclosure/ethics
2.
Gen Dent ; 50(4): 340-3, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12640850

ABSTRACT

A number of studies involving xylitol chewing gum have demonstrated that xylitol is both noncariogenic and anticariogenic. The ability of xylitol to act as an anticariogenic agent most likely is due to its ability to be transported into caries-causing oral bacteria and inhibiting fermentation either by depleting the cell of high-energy phosphate or by poisoning the glycolytic system. In vitro tests were conducted to determine the concentration of xylitol required to inhibit the growth of three strains of oral streptococcus (S. mutans, S. salivarius, and S. sanguis). All three strains were inhibited significantly at xylitol concentrations of 12.5% and higher; however, only S. mutans was inhibited significantly at a xylitol concentration of 1.56%.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cariostatic Agents/pharmacology , Sweetening Agents/pharmacology , Xylitol/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Cariostatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Chewing Gum , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fermentation/drug effects , Glycolysis/drug effects , Humans , Statistics as Topic , Streptococcus/drug effects , Streptococcus/growth & development , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/growth & development , Streptococcus sanguis/drug effects , Streptococcus sanguis/growth & development , Sweetening Agents/administration & dosage , Sweetening Agents/pharmacokinetics , Xylitol/administration & dosage , Xylitol/pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...