ABSTRACT
The accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PSS) placement in the lateral decubitus position has seldom been reported. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the accuracy of PPS placement with 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy-based navigation in 2 cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus or prone positions at our single institute. A total of 265 consecutive patients underwent spinal surgery with PPS from T1 (thoracic 1) to S (sacrum) under the 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system at our institute. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their intraoperative patient positioning: lateral decubitus (Group L) or prone (Group P). A total of 1816 PPSs were placed from T1 to S, and 76 (4.18%) PPSs were assessed as deviated PPS. Twenty-one of 453 (4.64%) PPSs in Group L deviation and 55 of 1363 (4.04%) PPSs in Group P had deviated PPS, but with not significant difference (P = .580). In Group L, although the PPS deviation rate was not significantly different between the upside and downside PPS, the downside PPS significantly deviated toward the lateral side compared with the upside PPS. The safety and efficacy of PPS insertion in the lateral decubitus position were similar to those in the conventional prone position.
Subject(s)
Pedicle Screws , Spinal Fusion , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Prone Position , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Fluoroscopy/methods , Patient PositioningABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with ankylosing spinal disorders (ASDs), such as ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, often have rigid kyphosis of the spine. The fracture site is sometimes unintentionally displaced when surgery is conducted with the patient prone. To prevent this incident, the authors adopted the lateral decubitus position for patients intraoperatively for this pathology. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the impact of the lateral decubitus position in the perioperative period on posterior fixation for thoracolumbar fractures with ASD. METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent posterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar fracture with ASD at the authors' institute were divided into 15 lateral decubitus positions (group L) and 22 prone positions (group P). Surgical time, estimated blood loss (EBL), number of levels fused, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), ratio of fracture voids, and ratio of anterior wall height were investigated. The ratio of fracture void and the ratio of anterior wall height were the radiological assessments showing a degree of reduction in vertebral fracture on CT. RESULTS: Age, sex, BMI, fracture level, and LOS were similar between the groups. Levels fused and EBL were significantly shorter and less in group L (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04), but there was no significant difference in surgical time. The complication rate was similar, but 1 death within 90 days after surgery was found in group P. The ratio of fracture voids was 85.4% ± 12.8% for group L and 117.5% ± 37.3% for group P. A significantly larger number of patients with a fracture void ratio of 100% or less was found in group L (86.7% vs 36.4%, p = 0.002). The ratio of anterior wall height was 107.5% ± 12.3% for group L and 116.9% ± 18.8% for group P. A significantly larger number of patients with the anterior wall height ratio of 100% or less was also found in group L (60.0% vs 27.3%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the lateral decubitus position can be expected to have an effect on closing or maintaining the fracture void or a preventive effect of intraoperative unintentional extension displacement of the fractured site, which is often seen in the prone position during surgery for thoracolumbar fractures involving ASD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The combined anterior-posterior surgery in the lateral decubitus position generally needs the intraoperative repositioning. However, prolonged surgical time and increased medical costs due to intraoperative repositioning have been problematic. In recent years, there have been reports of combined anterior-posterior procedure with a single position performing anterior and posterior fixation consecutively where the patient remains in the lateral decubitus position (single surgeon method-SS method). We had further advanced this method, and have adopted the Simultaneous Parallel Anterior and Posterior combined lumbar spine Surgery using intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (SPAPS method), where anterior and posterior procedure are performed independently by two spine surgeons. METHODS: 66 cases that underwent SPAPS method (n=37) and SS method (n=29) from 2015 to 2019 at single institution were concluded in this study. The pre- and post-operative changes in the following were compared retrospectively between the two groups: surgical factors and clinical evaluations including JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ), visual analogue scale (VAS) on lower back pain, buttock/lower limb pain, and buttock/lower limb numbness, and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ). RESULTS: The SPAPS method was able to significantly reduce the surgical time (p=0.0025) compared to the SS method, and allowed a reduction of approximately 24.4 minutes per segment. The estimated blood loss were similar in both groups, and with regards to post-operative outcomes, both groups improved equally well. The rates of screw deviation and fusion were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of performing the combined anterior-posterior surgery under a single position, the anterior and posterior procedure can be performed independently and simultaneously by two spine surgeons by utilizing the 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation. The surgical time can be significantly reduced by approximately 24.4 minutes per segment comparing to the SS method.
