Acceleration of type 1 diabetes by a coxsackievirus infection requires a preexisting critical mass of autoreactive T-cells in pancreatic islets.

Coxsackievirus infections have been proposed as an environmental trigger for the development of T-cell-mediated autoimmune (type 1) diabetes by either providing a molecular mimic of the candidate pancreatic beta-cell autoantigen GAD or inducing bystander inflammation in the pancreas. In this study in the NOD mouse model, we found that infection with a pancreatrophic coxsackievirus isolate can accelerate type 1 diabetes development through the induction of a bystander activation effect, but only after a critical threshold level of insulitic beta-cell-autoreactive T-cells has accumulated. Thus, coxsackievirus infections do not appear to initiate beta-cell autoreactive immunity but can accelerate the process once it is underway. These findings indicate that the timing of a coxsackievirus infection, rather than its simple presence or absence, may have important etiological implications for the development of T-cell-mediated autoimmune type 1 diabetes in humans.

The relationship between humoral and cellular immunity to IA-2 in IDDM.

Autoantibodies to the neuroendocrine protein insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA-2), a member of the tyrosine phosphatase family, have been observed in individuals with or at increased risk for IDDM. Because this disease is thought to result from a T-cell-mediated autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing pancreatic beta-cells, we analyzed humoral and cellular immune reactivity to this autoantigen to further define its role in the pathogenesis of IDDM. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from individuals with newly diagnosed IDDM or at varying levels of risk for the disease were stimulated in vitro with the entire 42-kDa internal domain of IA-2 (amino acids 603-979), a series of control antigens (glutathionine-S-transferase, tetanus toxoid, Candida albicans, mumps, bovine serum albumin), and a mitogen (phytohemagglutinin). The frequency and mean stimulation index of PBMC proliferation against IA-2 was significantly higher in newly diagnosed IDDM subjects (14 of 33 [42%]; 3.8+/-4.5 at 10 microg/ml) and autoantibody-positive relatives at increased risk for IDDM (6 of 9 [66%]; 3.9+/-3.2) compared with autoantibody-negative relatives (1 of 15 [7%]; 1.8+/-1.0) or healthy control subjects (1 of 12 [8%]; 1.5+/-1.0). The frequencies of cellular immune reactivities to all other antigens were remarkably similar between each subject group. Sera from 58% of the newly diagnosed IDDM patients tested were IA-2 autoantibody positive. Despite investigations suggesting an inverse association between humoral and cellular immune reactivities against islet-cell-associated autoantigens, no such relationship was observed (rs=0.18, P=0.39) with respect to IA-2. These studies support the autoantigenic nature of IA-2 in IDDM and suggest the inclusion of cellular immune responses as an adjunct marker for the disease.