Image-based digital post-discharge surveillance in England: measuring patient enrolment, engagement, clinician response times, surgical site infection, and carbon footprint.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) can have a significant impact on patients, their families and healthcare providers. With shortening inpatient periods, the post-discharge element of surveillance is becoming increasingly important. Proactive surveillance, including digital wound images using patient smartphones, may be an efficient alternative to traditional methods for collecting post-discharge surveillance (PDS). AIM: To determine success in patient enrolment and engagement including reasons for non-response, the time for clinicians to respond to patients, SSI rates, and carbon emissions when conducting PDS using patient smartphones. METHODS: An evaluation was undertaken for a one-month period (June 2022) in two adult cardiac surgery services which routinely used patient smartphones for PDS, using the secure Islacare (Isla) system. FINDINGS: The initial patient response rate for Isla was 87.3%, and the majority of patients (73%) remained engaged throughout the 30-day period. There was no significant difference in age, gender, operation type or distance to hospital between Isla responders or non-responders, or if the hospital provided a photo at discharge or not. Patients using Isla had a shorter post-discharge stay (P = 0.03), although this was not attributed to the platform. Patients not owning a smartphone and a technical issue were the main barriers to participation. Overall, nine SSIs were recorded, eight through the Isla surveillance and one through a hospital transfer readmission. The carbon emission associated with the SSI ranged from 5 to 2615 kg CO2e. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, using patient smartphones is an effective method to collect PDS, including wound images.

SARS-CoV-2 surface and air contamination in an acute healthcare setting during the first and second pandemic waves.

BACKGROUND: Surfaces and air in healthcare facilities can be contaminated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Previously, the authors identified SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces and air in their hospital during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (April 2020). AIM: To explore whether the profile of SARS-CoV-2 surface and air contamination had changed between April 2020 and January 2021. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study in a multi-site London hospital. In January 2021, surface and air samples were collected from comparable areas to those sampled in April 2020, comprising six clinical areas and a public area. SARS-CoV-2 was detected using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and viral culture. Sampling was also undertaken in two wards with natural ventilation alone. The ability of the prevalent variants at the time of the study to survive on dry surfaces was evaluated. FINDINGS: No viable virus was recovered from surfaces or air. Five percent (N=14) of 270 surface samples and 4% (N=1) of 27 air samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2, which was significantly lower than in April 2020 [52% (N=114) of 218 surface samples and 48% (N=13) of 27 air samples (P<0.001, Fisher's exact test)]. There was no clear difference in the proportion of surface and air samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA based on the type of ventilation in the ward. All variants tested survived on dry surfaces for >72 h, with a <3-log10 reduction in viable count. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that enhanced infection prevention measures have reduced the burden of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on surfaces and air in healthcare facilities.

The cost-effectiveness of temporary single-patient rooms to reduce risks of healthcare-associated infection.

BACKGROUND: The use of single rooms for patient isolation often forms part of a wider bundle to prevent certain healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in hospitals. Demand for single rooms often exceeds what is available and the use of temporary isolation rooms may help resolve this. Changes to infection prevention practice should be supported by evidence showing that cost-effectiveness is plausible and likely. AIM: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation of adopting temporary single rooms into UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of a decision to adopt a temporary, single-patient, isolation room to the current infection prevention efforts of an NHS hospital was modelled. Primary outcomes are the expected change to total costs and life-years from an NHS perspective. FINDINGS: The mean expected incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) is £5,829. The probability that adoption is cost-effective against a £20,000 threshold per additional LYG is 93%, and for a £13,000 threshold the probability is 87%. The conclusions are robust to scenarios for key model parameters. If a temporary single-patient isolation room reduces risks of HAI by 16.5% then an adoption decision is more likely to be cost-effective than not. Our estimate of the effectiveness reflects guidelines and reasonable assumptions and the theoretical rationale is strong. CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties about the effectiveness of temporary isolation rooms for reducing risks of HAI, there is some evidence that an adoption decision is likely to be cost-effective for the NHS setting. Prospective studies will be useful to reduce this source of uncertainty.

Hospital-onset COVID-19 infection surveillance systems: a systematic review.

Hospital-onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs) are associated with excess morbidity and mortality in patients and healthcare workers. The aim of this review was to explore and describe the current literature in HOCI surveillance. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and MedRxiv were searched up to 30 November 2020 using broad search criteria. Articles of HOCI surveillance systems were included. Data describing HOCI definitions, HOCI incidence, types of HOCI identification surveillance systems, and level of system implementation were extracted. A total of 292 citations were identified. Nine studies on HOCI surveillance were included. Six studies reported on the proportion of HOCI among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, which ranged from 0 to 15.2%. Six studies provided HOCI case definitions. Standardized national definitions provided by the UK and US governments were identified. Four studies included healthcare workers in the surveillance. One study articulated a multimodal strategy of infection prevention and control practices including HOCI surveillance. All identified HOCI surveillance systems were implemented at institutional level, with eight studies focusing on all hospital inpatients and one study focusing on patients in the emergency department. Multiple types of surveillance were identified. Four studies reported automated surveillance, of which one included real-time analysis, and one included genomic data. Overall, the study quality was limited by the observational nature with short follow-up periods. In conclusion, HOCI case definitions and surveillance methods were developed pragmatically. Whilst standardized case definitions and surveillance systems are ideal for integration with existing routine surveillance activities and adoption in different settings, we acknowledged the difficulties in establishing such standards in the short-term.

How dirty is your QWERTY? The risk of healthcare pathogen transmission from computer keyboards.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare environmental surfaces may be contaminated with micro-organisms that cause healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). Special attention is paid to near-patient surfaces but sites outside the patient zone receive less attention. This paper presents data on keyboard contamination and the risk of pathogen transmission from keyboards. METHODS: Keyboards from nursing stations in three hospitals and a dental practice were analysed for bacterial contamination. Surfaces were pre-treated to remove planktonic bacteria so that any remaining bacteria were presumed to be associated with biofilm. Bacterial transfer from keyboard keys was studied following wiping with sterile water or sodium hypochlorite. The presence of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was sought using selective culture. RESULTS: Moist swabbing did not detect bacteria from any keyboard samples. Use of enrichment broth, however, demonstrated MDROs from most samples. Gram-negative bacteria were recovered from almost half (45%) of the samples, with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and MDR Acinetobacter spp. recovered from 72%, 31% and 17% of samples, respectively. Isolates were transferred from 69% of samples after wiping with sterile water, and from 54% of samples after wiping with 1000 ppm sodium hypochlorite. DISCUSSION: While moist swabbing failed to detect bacteria from keyboards, pathogens were recovered using enrichment culture. Use of water- or NaOCl-soaked wipes transferred bacteria from most samples tested. This study implies that hospital keyboards situated outside the patient zone commonly harbour dry surface biofilms (DSBs) that offer a potential reservoir for transferable pathogens. While the role of keyboards in transmission is uncertain, there is a need to pursue effective solutions for eliminating DSBs from keyboards.

Evaluation of a personal protective equipment support programme for staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in London.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented an enormous challenge to healthcare providers worldwide. The appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has been essential to ensure staff and patient safety. The 'PPE Helper Programme' was developed at a large London hospital group to counteract suboptimal PPE practice. Based on a behaviour change model of capability, opportunity and motivation (COM-B), the programme provided PPE support, advice and education to ward staff. AIM: Evaluation of the PPE Helper Programme. METHODS: Clinical and non-clinical ward staff completed a questionnaire informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. The questionnaire was available in paper and electronic versions. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics, and free-text responses were analysed thematically. FINDINGS: Over a 6-week period, PPE helpers made 268 ward visits. Overall, 261 questionnaires were available for analysis. Across the Trust, 68% of respondents reported having had contact with a PPE helper. Staff who had encountered a PPE helper responded significantly more positively to a range of statements about using PPE than staff who had not encountered a PPE helper. Black and minority ethnic staff were significantly more anxious regarding the adequacy of PPE. Non-clinical and redeployed staff (e.g. domestic staff) were most positive about the impact of PPE helpers. Free-text comments showed that staff found the PPE Helper Programme supportive and would have liked it earlier in the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The PPE Helper Programme is a feasible and beneficial intervention for providing support, advice and education to ward staff during infectious disease outbreaks.

How do surgeons feel about the 'Getting it Right First Time' national audit? Results from a qualitative assessment.

The implementation of the national 'Getting It Right First Time' was assessed by interviewing six surgeons involved at various levels in surgical site infection (SSI) audit. The positive impacts were to create new professional collaboration, improve stakeholder engagement, and increase the profile of SSIs. One particular knowledge gap highlighted was that some participants had been unaware until that point of the criteria for diagnosing an SSI. The quality of data collected was felt to be poor due to methodological flaws. The audit was described as highly time-consuming and unsustainable if leaning on junior surgeons, without protected time and designated responsibility.

Individual- and community-level risk factors for ESBL Enterobacteriaceae colonization identified by universal admission screening in London.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated risk factors for gastrointestinal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae which produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL-E), including individual-level variables such as antibiotic use and foreign travel, and community-level variables such as housing and deprivation. METHODS: In an observational study in 2015, all patients admitted to a London hospital group were approached to be screened for ESBL-E carriage using rectal swabs for 4 months. Patients completed a risk factor questionnaire. Those with a residential postcode in the local catchment area were linked to a database containing community-level risk factor data. Risk factors for ESBL-E carriage were determined by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 4006 patients, 360 (9.0%) carried ESBL-E. Escherichia coli was the most common organism (77.8%), and CTX-M-type ESBLs were the most common genes (57.9% CTX-M-15 and 20.7% CTX-M-9). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for phenotypic ESBL-E among the 1633 patients with a residential postcode within the local catchment area were: travel to Asia (OR 4.4, CI 2.5-7.6) or Africa (OR 2.4, CI 1.2-4.8) in the 12 months prior to admission, two or more courses of antibiotics in the 6 months prior to admission (OR 2.0, CI 1.3-3.0), and residence in a district with a higher-than-average prevalence of overcrowded households (OR 1.5, CI 1.05-2.2). . CONCLUSIONS: Both individual and community variables were associated with ESBL-E carriage at hospital admission. The novel observation that household overcrowding is associated with ESBL-E carriage requires confirmation, but raises the possibility that targeted interventions in the community could help prevent transmission of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Planning to halve Gram-negative bloodstream infection: getting to grips with healthcare-associated Escherichia coli bloodstream infection sources.

BACKGROUND: A thorough understanding of the local sources, risks, and antibiotic resistance for Escherichia coli bloodstream infection (BSI) is required to focus prevention initiatives and therapy. AIM: To review the sources and antibiotic resistance of healthcare-associated E. coli BSI. METHODS: Sources and antibiotic resistance profiles of all 250 healthcare-associated (post 48 h) E. coli BSIs that occurred within our secondary and tertiary care hospital group from April 2014 to March 2017 were reviewed. Epidemiological associations with urinary source, gastrointestinal source, and febrile neutropenia-related BSIs were analysed using univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models. FINDINGS: E. coli BSIs increased 9% from 4.0 to 4.4 per 10,000 admissions comparing the 2014/15 and 2016/17 financial years. Eighty-nine cases (36%) had a urinary source; 30 (34%) of these were classified as urinary catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). Forty-five (18%) were related to febrile neutropenia, and 38 (15%) had a gastrointestinal source. Cases were rarely associated with surgical procedures (11, 4%) or indwelling vascular devices (seven, 3%). Female gender (odds ratio: 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.6) and older age (1.02; 1.00-1.05) were significantly associated with a urinary source. No significant associations were identified for gastrointestinal source or febrile neutropenia-related BSIs. Forty-seven percent of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 37% to third-generation cephalosporins, and 22% to gentamicin. CONCLUSION: The gastrointestinal tract and febrile neutropenia together accounted for one-third of E. coli BSI locally but were rare associations nationally. These sources need to be targeted locally to reduce an increasing trend of E. coli BSIs.

Comparison of national strategies to reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Japan and England.

BACKGROUND: National responses to healthcare-associated infections vary between high-income countries, but, when analysed for contextual comparability, interventions can be assessed for transferability. AIM: To identify learning from country-level approaches to addressing meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Japan and England. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis (2000-2017), comparing epidemiological trends and policy interventions. Data from 441 textual sources concerning infection prevention and control (IPC), surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions were systematically coded for: (a) type: mandatory requirements, recommendations, or national campaigns; (b) method: restrictive, persuasive, structural in nature; (c) level of implementation: macro (national), meso (organizational), micro (individual) levels. Healthcare organizational structures and role of media were also assessed. FINDINGS: In England significant reduction has been achieved in number of reported MRSA bloodstream infections. In Japan, in spite of reductions, MRSA remains a predominant infection. Both countries face new threats in the emergence of drug-resistant Escherichia coli. England has focused on national mandatory and structural interventions, supported by a combination of outcomes-based incentives and punitive mechanisms, and multi-disciplinary IPC hospital teams. Japan has focused on (non-mandatory) recommendations and primarily persuasive interventions, supported by process-based incentives, with voluntary surveillance. Areas for development in Japan include resourcing of dedicated data management support and implementation of national campaigns for healthcare professionals and the public. CONCLUSION: Policy interventions need to be relevant to local epidemiological trends, while acceptable within the health system, culture, and public expectations. Cross-national learning can help inform the right mix of interventions to create sustainable and resilient systems for future infection and economic challenges.

Beware biofilm! Dry biofilms containing bacterial pathogens on multiple healthcare surfaces; a multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Wet biofilms associated with medical devices have been widely studied and their link with healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) is well recognized. Little attention has been paid to the presence of dry biofilms on environmental surfaces in healthcare settings. AIM: To investigate the occurrence, prevalence, and diversity of dry biofilms on hospital surfaces. METHODS: Sixty-one terminally cleaned items were received from three different UK hospitals. The presence of dry biofilm was investigated using culture-based methods and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bacterial diversity within biofilms was investigated using ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer analysis (RISA)-polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing. FINDINGS: Multi-species dry biofilms were recovered from 95% of 61 samples. Abundance and complexity of dry biofilms were confirmed by SEM. All biofilms harboured Gram-positive bacteria including pathogens associated with HCAI; 58% of samples grew meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Dry biofilms had similar physical composition regardless of the type of items sampled or the ward from which the samples originated. There were differences observed in the dominance of particular species: dry biofilms from two hospitals contained mostly staphylococcal DNA, whereas more Bacillus spp. DNA was found on surfaces from the third hospital. CONCLUSION: The presence of dry biofilms harbouring bacterial pathogens is virtually universal on commonly used items in healthcare settings. The role of dry biofilms in spreading HCAIs may be underestimated. The risk may be further exacerbated by inefficient cleaning and disinfection practices for hospital surfaces.

Evaluating serial screening cultures to detect carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae following hospital admission.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are on the rise worldwide. National guidelines for the prevention and control of CPE recommend screening for the detection of asymptomatic carriers on admission. AIM: To evaluate the benefit of serial screens for detecting the carriage of CPE and other antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria following hospital admission. METHODS: All CPE screens, which were cultured on chromogenic media and the presence of a carbapenemase confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, were analysed for a six-month period. National guidelines in England recommend three serial screens for CPE separated by 48 h for admission screening for 'at-risk' patients, during which the patient is isolated. Two screening scenarios were tested. In scenario A, patients received three screens at the specified timepoints, in line with English national guidelines; in scenario B, patients received three consecutive screens, but not necessarily within the specified timepoints, during one admission. General linear models or conditional logistic regression were used to detect any significant change in the rate of carriage. FINDINGS: There was no significant increase in the detected carriage rate of CPE across any of the three timepoints in the scenarios tested. However, there was a significant increase in the detected rate of carriage of Gram-negative bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and resistant Enterobacteriaceae (excluding CPE) in scenario B. CONCLUSION: Three serial screens were not useful for the detection of CPE carriage on admission. The increase in the carriage rate of other Gram-negative bacteria may be explained by 'unmasking' of pre-existing carriage, or acquisition. This argues for regular screening of long-stay patients.

Efficacy and acceptability of rectal and perineal sampling for identifying gastrointestinal colonization with extended spectrum ß-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated 'pre-laboratory' factors associated with the detection of extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) colonization including anatomical site, and staff and patient factors. METHODS: All admissions to a large London hospital over 3 months were approached to provide rectal and perineal swabs, which were cultured for ESBL-E using chromogenic media. ESBL-E detection rates for patient- or staff-collected rectal or perineal swabs were compared using McNemar tests. Binary logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab. The impact of simplifying the verbal study description to patients to improve the participation rate was evaluated. RESULTS: Carriage of ESBL-E was significantly higher in rectal swabs than perineal swabs (7.8% of 4006 versus 3.8% of 4006, p <0.001), whether collected by staff or patients; 31.9% of 869 patients did not provide a rectal swab before the change in study description compared with 7.6% of 3690 patients afterwards (p <0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with patients declining to provide a rectal swab were younger age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00), female gender (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.52), transfers from other hospitals (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93) or an unknown admission route (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.37), being admitted before the change in study description (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31-0.48), and the staff member who consented the patient (p <0.001); ethnicity was not a significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal swabs are recommended for the detection of ESBL-E colonization. Staff and patient factors influence whether patients participate in prevalence studies, which may skew their findings.

Counting the cost of an outbreak of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an economic evaluation from a hospital perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To perform an economic evaluation on the cost associated with an outbreak of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). METHODS: We performed an observational economic evaluation of an outbreak of CPE (NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae) affecting 40 patients in a group of five hospitals across three sites in West London. Costs were split into actual expenditure (including anti-infective costs, enhanced CPE screening, contact precautions, temporary ward-based monitors of hand and environmental practice, and environmental decontamination), and 'opportunity cost' (staff time, bed closures and elective surgical missed revenue). Costs are estimated from the hospital perspective over the 10-month duration of the outbreak. RESULTS: The outbreak cost €1.1m over 10 months (range €0.9-1.4m), comprising €312 000 actual expenditure, and €822 000 (range €631 000-€1.1m) in opportunity cost. An additional €153 000 was spent on Estates renovations prompted by the outbreak. Actual expenditure comprised: €54 000 on anti-infectives for 18 patients treated, €94 000 on laboratory costs for screening, €73 000 on contact precautions for 1831 contact precautions patient-days, €42 000 for hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination of 24 single rooms, €43 000 on 2592 hours of ward-based monitors, and €6000 of expenditure related to ward and bay closures. Opportunity costs comprised: €244 000 related to 1206 lost bed-days (range 366-2562 bed-days, €77 000-€512 000), €349 000 in missed revenue from 72 elective surgical procedures, and €228 000 in staff time (range €205 000-€251 000). Reduced capacity to perform elective surgical procedures related to bed closures (€349 000) represented the greatest cost. CONCLUSIONS: The cost estimates that we present suggest that CPE outbreaks are highly costly.

Reduction in Clostridium difficile infection associated with the introduction of hydrogen peroxide vapour automated room disinfection.

The clinical impact of implementing hydrogen peroxide vapour (HPV) disinfection of rooms vacated by patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was evaluated. Breakpoint time series analysis indicated a significant reduction (P<0.001) in the CDI rate at the time when HPV disinfection was implemented, resulting in a reduction in the CDI rate from 1.0 to 0.4 cases per 1000 patient-days in the 24 months before HPV usage compared with the first 24 months of HPV usage. HPV should be considered to augment the terminal disinfection of rooms vacated by patients with CDI.