Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi ; 12(1): 16-7, 2004 Jan.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14761275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of different hepatitis E diagnosis reagent tests on the acute hepatitis E. METHODS: Three acute hepatitis E diagnosis tests, E2-IgM (Wantai, China), GL-IgM and GL-IgG (Genelabs, Singapore) were compared for their reliability in a sera panel composed by 273 healthy individuals and 525 hepatitis. RESULTS: The specificity of E2-IgM on the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E was 100.0%, it was significantly higher than GL-IgM (96.7%) and GL-IgG (85.4%). The sensitivity of E2-IgM and GL-IgG were 97.9% and 93.8% respectively, both significantly higher than GL-IgM (72.9%). Among 65 acute hepatitis cases being positive on GL-IgM test but negative on E2-IgM, 58 (89.2%) cases were found to be positive with anti-hepatitis A virus IgM, it indicated that the GL-IgM test might be interfered by other IgM antibodies on serum. CONCLUSION: E2-IgM is a good test for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Acute Disease , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL